May someone please make any comments about my message and situation?
Richard?
--
Balaco
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015, at 16:45, Balaco Baco wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015, at 19:15, Balaco Baco wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015, at 18:32, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > > Am 23.11.201
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015, at 19:15, Balaco Baco wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015, at 18:32, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Am 23.11.2015 um 22:31 schrieb Balaco Baco:
> > > I skimmed though it. To use ping to test if Internet connections are
> > > working or not is one the most
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015, at 19:15, Balaco Baco wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015, at 18:32, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Am 23.11.2015 um 22:31 schrieb Balaco Baco:
> > > I skimmed though it. To use ping to test if Internet connections are
> > > working or not is one the most
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015, at 19:15, Balaco Baco wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015, at 18:32, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Am 23.11.2015 um 22:31 schrieb Balaco Baco:
> > > I skimmed though it. To use ping to test if Internet connections are
> > > working or not is one the most
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015, at 18:32, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 23.11.2015 um 22:31 schrieb Balaco Baco:
> > I skimmed though it. To use ping to test if Internet connections are
> > working or not is one the most basic things everybody does and learn.
> > If, in some exotic set
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015, at 17:57, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 23.11.2015 um 21:55 schrieb Balaco Baco:
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015, at 17:50, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> Am 23.11.2015 um 21:48 schrieb Balaco Baco:
> >>> Please be clearer.
> >>>
> >
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015, at 17:50, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 23.11.2015 um 21:48 schrieb Balaco Baco:
> > Please be clearer.
> >
> > You said "you can also use the Internet". But after that you repeat "As
> > I wrote ICMP is not supported on SLIRP.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015, at 17:32, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 23.11.2015 um 21:31 schrieb Balaco Baco:
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015, at 17:07, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> Am 23.11.2015 um 21:04 schrieb Balaco Baco:
> >>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015, at 16:38, Richa
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015, at 17:07, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 23.11.2015 um 21:04 schrieb Balaco Baco:
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015, at 16:38, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> Am 23.11.2015 um 20:04 schrieb Balaco Baco:
> >>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015, at 13:35, Richa
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015, at 16:38, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 23.11.2015 um 20:04 schrieb Balaco Baco:
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015, at 13:35, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> Am 22.11.2015 um 16:39 schrieb Balaco Baco:
> >>>>>>>>> Since I have no ro
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015, at 13:35, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 22.11.2015 um 16:39 schrieb Balaco Baco:
> >>>>>>> Since I have no root access in the host machine, I must use 'slirp'.
> >>>>>>> Right? Now I'll install it (https://en
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015, at 18:15, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 12.11.2015 um 14:22 schrieb Balaco Baco:
> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015, at 10:00, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> Am 12.11.2015 um 02:57 schrieb Balaco Baco:
> >>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015, at 17:34, Richa
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015, at 10:00, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 12.11.2015 um 02:57 schrieb Balaco Baco:
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015, at 17:34, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> Am 11.11.2015 um 18:57 schrieb Balaco Baco:
> >>> Since I have no root access in the h
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015, at 17:34, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 11.11.2015 um 18:57 schrieb Balaco Baco:
> > Since I have no root access in the host machine, I must use 'slirp'.
> > Right? Now I'll install it (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slirp) from
> > source
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015, at 05:46, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 31.10.2015 um 02:12 schrieb Balaco Baco:
> > I do not have a final working step by step from zero until now. One is
> > giving compiling errors. The working UML (unknown origin, I don't know
> > how I ma
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015, at 17:34, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 11.11.2015 um 18:57 schrieb Balaco Baco:
> > Since I have no root access in the host machine, I must use 'slirp'.
> > Right? Now I'll install it (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slirp) from
> > source
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015, at 15:42, Balaco Baco wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015, at 14:57, Balaco Baco wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015, at 14:29, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > > Am 11.11.2015 um 18:21 schrieb Balaco Baco:
> > > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015, at 14:07, Richard Wei
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015, at 14:57, Balaco Baco wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015, at 14:29, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Am 11.11.2015 um 18:21 schrieb Balaco Baco:
> > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015, at 14:07, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Bala
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015, at 14:29, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 11.11.2015 um 18:21 schrieb Balaco Baco:
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015, at 14:07, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Balaco Baco wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015, at 13:39, Richa
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015, at 14:07, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Balaco Baco wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015, at 13:39, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Balaco Baco wrote:
> >> > There is one details that d
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015, at 13:39, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Balaco Baco wrote:
> > There is one details that did not work for me, but it was easy to "fix"
> > (quotes because I'm not sure it is the best fix). But someo
There is one detail that did not work for me, but it was easy to "fix"
(quotes because I'm not sure it is the best fix). But someone else may
find it useful.
Detailed steps so everyone can compare doing it, if needed:
> 1. get one kernel source package from https://cdn.kernel.org/
> (I tried th
There is one details that did not work for me, but it was easy to "fix"
(quotes because I'm not sure it is the best fix). But someone else may
find it useful.
Detailed steps so everyone can compare doing it, if needed:
> 1. get one kernel source package from https://cdn.kernel.org/
> (I tried t
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Balaco Baco wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015, at 16:55, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Balaco Baco wrote:
> >> >> > > >> > Really!? I wish I had read tha
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Balaco Baco wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015, at 16:55, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Balaco Baco wrote:
> >> >> > > >> > Really!? I wish I had read tha
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015, at 16:30, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Balaco Baco wrote:
> > I restarted, now I've got another kernel source (2.6.32.68), knowing
> > that it may be old, but it's the "newer old" for 2.6, and I hoped that
I restarted, now I've got another kernel source (2.6.32.68), knowing
that it may be old, but it's the "newer old" for 2.6, and I hoped that
it would work.
Steps done:
1. downloaded https://cdn. kernel
.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/longterm/v2.6.32/linux-2.6.32.68.tar.xz
2. extract with tar cJf (what
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015, at 16:55, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Balaco Baco wrote:
> >> > > >> > Really!? I wish I had read that somewhere. Well, just retried with
> >> > > >> > another option that is there for m
> > > >> > Really!? I wish I had read that somewhere. Well, just retried with
> > > >> > another option that is there for me. It is one of the cases I
> > > >> > detailed
> > > >> > before that end with error.
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >> Linux 2.6.24?! SRSLY?
> > >
> > > If you want me to help,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015, at 11:12, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Balaco Baco wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015, at 10:18, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> Am 29.10.2015 um 14:14 schrieb Balaco Baco:
> >> > Really!? I wish I had rea
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015, at 10:21, Balaco Baco wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015, at 10:18, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Am 29.10.2015 um 14:14 schrieb Balaco Baco:
> > > Really!? I wish I had read that somewhere. Well, just retried with
> > > another option that is
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015, at 10:18, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 29.10.2015 um 14:14 schrieb Balaco Baco:
> > Really!? I wish I had read that somewhere. Well, just retried with
> > another option that is there for me. It is one of the cases I detailed
> > before that end wit
, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Balaco Baco wrote:
> > A few weeks ago, after more struggling than I expected, I was abble to
> > run UML. I recompiled the linux kernel from source; I did not use the
> > root fs files available in the website, and foun
A few weeks ago, after more struggling than I expected, I was abble to
run UML. I recompiled the linux kernel from source; I did not use the
root fs files available in the website, and found a Debian that seems to
suit my needs.
But yesterday I tried to execute it again, it did not work. The fact
Interesting idea! :)
But why not using "real" network connections? If you keep a connection
open, you will have no "big" overhead besides openning it the first time
(or reopenning, if eventually needed). You will be able to choose the
format of each message contents, as desired. And the communicat
> At first please show me both outputs of the 64bit and 32bit kernel.
>
I'll send them - just with a severe lack of time these last few weeks.
--
Balaco
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015, at 05:33, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Balaco Baco wrote:
>
n, Jun 21, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Balaco Baco wrote:
> > I'm remotely accessing an Ubuntu 14.04.2 machine. And now I'm trying to
> > run an UML in it, but it is always giving me some errors, and it
> > finishes with segfaults or c
I'm remotely accessing an Ubuntu 14.04.2 machine. And now I'm trying to
run an UML in it, but it is always giving me some errors, and it
finishes with segfaults or coredumps.
For example, the end of output is:
=
request_module: runaway loop modprobe binfmt-464c
Starting in
38 matches
Mail list logo
