On Thu, Oct 29, 2015, at 11:12, Richard Weinberger wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Balaco Baco <balacob...@imap.cc> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015, at 10:18, Richard Weinberger wrote: > >> Am 29.10.2015 um 14:14 schrieb Balaco Baco: > >> > Really!? I wish I had read that somewhere. Well, just retried with > >> > another option that is there for me. It is one of the cases I detailed > >> > before that end with error. > >> > > >> > The full execution, right now, is: > >> > > >> > ========================== > >> > $./linux-2.6.24-x86_64 ubda=Debian-Wheezy-AMD64-root_fs mem=128M > >> > >> Linux 2.6.24?! SRSLY? > > If you want me to help, please use a recent/supported kernel. > Ready-to-use root filesystems can be found everywhere. > For example: http://fs.devloop.org.uk/ >
I'm not sure now, but the two Debian root fs I'm using were downloaded from the site you point here. Later I'll check their sums, and PS this in a next message. Kernels 2.6.* were recent and assumed to be supported in most places I could need - or so I assumed. What is your definition of recent and your definition of supported? This may be useful for many other users of UML I guess. The fact that the kernels offered in the UML website didn't work, and then I tried to compile from source should be pointed here. I don't think I have done something so weird or uncommon here - mainly because I don't need much as long as I have flexibility to execute it. -- http://www.fastmail.com - Or how I learned to stop worrying and love email again ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-user mailing list User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user
