Re: [uml-user] Cannot bringup DHCP (2.6.39 kernel + Debian 5.0 rootfs)

2011-11-30 Thread Antoine Martin
(snip) >>> Having been struggling this for 1 week, any help appreciated ! >> Have you tried following these instructions: >> http://uml.devloop.org.uk/howto.html > Question here, if uml is running in my desktop, i need to install and run > dhcpd in my desktop ? If you are following the howto yes.

Re: [uml-user] Cannot bringup DHCP (2.6.39 kernel + Debian 5.0 rootfs)

2011-11-30 Thread Jeff Dike
The thing about DHCP is that the protocol is confined to an ethernet broadcast domain, and a TUN/TAP connection to the host is a separate broadcast domain from the LAN. It's a private ethernet with two hosts on it. DHCP will work if one of the following is true: The DHCP server is the UML

Re: [uml-user] Cannot bringup DHCP (2.6.39 kernel + Debian 5.0 rootfs)

2011-11-30 Thread ning ji
> Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 01:50:08 +0700 > From: anto...@nagafix.co.uk > To: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [uml-user] Cannot bringup DHCP (2.6.39 kernel + Debian 5.0 > rootfs) > > On 11/30/2011 02:54 AM, ning ji wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > I'm new to UML, h

Re: [uml-user] Cannot bringup DHCP (2.6.39 kernel + Debian 5.0 rootfs)

2011-11-30 Thread Antoine Martin
On 11/30/2011 02:54 AM, ning ji wrote: > > Hi everyone, > I'm new to UML, having issues bring up DHCP for my uml. > step 1:./kernel2.6.39 ubda=./debian50.rfs mem=128M > eth0=tuntap,,,10.50.183.254 Have you tried using a specific tap device here? Like: (...) eth0=tuntap,tap1,fe:f0:00:00:00:01,1

Re: [uml-user] build a own image

2011-11-30 Thread Antoine Martin
On 11/30/2011 08:25 PM, mattias wrote: > how to do it? > without bebootstrap I assume you mean debootstrap? And why would you want to avoid it? You aren't saying which distro or version you are trying to create which makes it difficult to give you any advice. For Fedora and Debian/Ubuntu distros y

Re: [uml-user] swapoff killed by OOM despite there is enough RAM available

2011-11-30 Thread richard -rw- weinberger
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Dmitry Panov wrote: > On 30/11/2011 14:00, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: >> >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Dmitry Panov >>  wrote: >>> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> I'm having an issue with swapoff which gets killed by OOM. I was able to >>> reproduce it with UML gues

Re: [uml-user] swapoff killed by OOM despite there is enough RAM available

2011-11-30 Thread Dmitry Panov
On 30/11/2011 14:00, richard -rw- weinberger wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Dmitry Panov > wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> I'm having an issue with swapoff which gets killed by OOM. I was able to >> reproduce it with UML guests running different kernel versions, starting >> from 2.6.26 to 3.

Re: [uml-user] swapoff killed by OOM despite there is enough RAM available

2011-11-30 Thread richard -rw- weinberger
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Dmitry Panov wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'm having an issue with swapoff which gets killed by OOM. I was able to > reproduce it with UML guests running different kernel versions, starting > from 2.6.26 to  3.1.3. The only difference is with latest kernels sometimes > it

[uml-user] build a own image

2011-11-30 Thread mattias
how to do it? without bebootstrap-- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk