Re: [uml-user] x86_64 and UML

2008-01-31 Thread Jeff Dike
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 09:04:26PM -0500, lanas wrote: > So, since UML is a user process, shoudn't it be that it can run on a > 64-bit AMD machine as is, along with a 32-bit filesystem ? Yes, modulo a couple of host bugs which have been fixed. Jeff -- Work emai

[uml-user] x86_64 and UML

2008-01-31 Thread lanas
Hi, There's a thing (at least one...) that I don't get. An AMD x86_64 is able to run 32-bits user processes. In fact, I got from the Fedora yum a 32-bit version of Firefox alongside the 64-bit version. So, since UML is a user process, shoudn't it be that it can run on a 64-bit AMD machine a

Re: [uml-user] Easy to use uml-based network

2008-01-31 Thread lanas
Le Samedi, 22 Décembre 2007 18:14:45 +0100, clowncoder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > If you want to use uml to simulate a network, you can try the very > easy to use > network at http://clownix.net, download uml_clownix_net_03.tar.gz, > (it is a bit > big) it contains an LFS-based file-system fu

Re: [uml-user] uml and firefox

2008-01-31 Thread Markus Schönhaber
clowncoder wrote: > I get a strange behaviour as far as isolation is concerned between an > uml machine > and the host, my uml machine is isolated from any network, > if firefox is already running in the host, running firefox in the uml > machine creates > an instance of firefox that is not isol