-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Jay Shah wrote:
> Hey,
>
>> Thanks for the reply.
> No Problem. Please remember to reply to the list address, though.
>
>> Considering a few of my host kernels are 2.6.9, even going to 2.6.20
>> would be a big step up!
>> Good to know that I wasn't
Hey,
> Thanks for the reply.
No Problem. Please remember to reply to the list address, though.
> Considering a few of my host kernels are 2.6.9, even going to 2.6.20
> would be a big step up!
> Good to know that I wasn't going mad about being unable to find a .23
> skas patch!
You certainly weren
Hi Gordon,
While this answer may not be what you're looking for, here goes:
I had that issue a few days ago, so I simply went for the 2.6.20
kernel anyway, and patched that with the latest one. For me, it was a
safer bet. I did, however, use the 2.6.23 kernel for UML Guests.
Jay
---
I was about to update my host kernels from the somewhat dated versions
I am using.
However, blaisorblade's host patches only seem to go to
2.6.20-v9-pre9. From what I can tell, the current stable kernel is
2.6.23.
I did try to patch from the 2.6.20 version I found, but a few of the
hunks failed.
On 14/10/2007, Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 03:49:00PM +0200, Flavio wrote:
> > if I want to build my guest kernel, I usually patch it with (e.g.)
> > uml-2.6.18.1-bb2.patch.bz2.
>
> You could just get 2.6.23 and be done with it.
2.6.23 kernel sources, or uml patch
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 03:49:00PM +0200, Flavio wrote:
> if I want to build my guest kernel, I usually patch it with (e.g.)
> uml-2.6.18.1-bb2.patch.bz2.
You could just get 2.6.23 and be done with it.
> Is it not ncessary to patch it, in order to have a guest kernel,
> either on x86_64 and on i3
For example,
if I want to build my guest kernel, I usually patch it with (e.g.)
uml-2.6.18.1-bb2.patch.bz2.
Is it not ncessary to patch it, in order to have a guest kernel,
either on x86_64 and on i386 architectures?
Flavio
On 14/10/2007, Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 200
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 12:21:34PM +0200, Flavio wrote:
> 2) patch your UML kernel with the uml-patch
What patch? x86_64 needs no more patching than i386.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
Skas0 mode starts even though you don't apply any patch to the host kernel.
Practically:
1) power on your x86_64 linux box (the host system) (this kernel is
with or without skas3 patch - it doesn't matter)
2) patch your UML kernel with the uml-patch
3) run your UML kernel using whatever filesystem
The same problem here.
Unfortunately skas3 mode isn't yet supported for x86_64 arch.
You can patch the host kernel using skas3 patch but it won't work.
Skas0 mode will works instead. It is not properly the same, but is
better than the old tt-mode.
As regard guests, you can patch them all. I think
Hi,
I use UML on several systems (i386 arch) since years. Now, I want to use it on
x86_64 systems.
My questions :
- does skas patch work fine on x86_64 ?
- idem for guest path ?
Cheers.
Jean-Michel Caricand
mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Créez votre adresse électronique [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11 matches
Mail list logo
