--- Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, the key was getting a good, modern 32-bit UML?
Yep, it does look like that was the essential step. I had previously tried to
use the prebuilt (Debian packaged) 32-bit binary UML from within the 32-bit
chroot but that attempt was also hit by segfaults.
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 11:29:30PM +0100, John Parsons wrote:
> Many thanks to all on the list for the advice received.
So, the key was getting a good, modern 32-bit UML?
Jeff
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 10:20:56PM +0200, Peter Buzanits wrote:
> As I have seen, the filesystems available for download at
> www.user-mode-linux.org are incredibly old (3 years and older). I have
> now found http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/ as a resource for more accurate
> filesystems for UML.
>
> If y
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 11:55:35PM +0500, Nadeem Shahbaz wrote:
> [LOG]
> Starting auditd: Kernel panic - not syncing: Kernel mode fault at addr
> 0x2aac02bc, ip 0x4000fd30
>
> EIP: 0073:[<4000fd30>] CPU: 0 Not tainted ESP: 007b:bf9fd59c EFLAGS:
> 0202
> Not tainted
> EAX: ffda EBX: 2a
Hi,
Just wanted to confirm that I've successfully built a working (32-bit) UML. Had
to build it inside my 32-bit chroot which I guess makes sense. The important
thing is that I now have UML running on my AMD64 box with no segfaults. Inside
the UML: I can use apt via my proxy, I can run Xnest sessi
Hello, all.
As I have seen, the filesystems available for download at
www.user-mode-linux.org are incredibly old (3 years and older). I have
now found http://uml.nagafix.co.uk/ as a resource for more accurate
filesystems for UML.
If you know some other sites providing filesystems, please reply to
Hi list,
Here is scenario that making trouble:
host is running 2.6.11-5 kernel and Fedora Core 2
UML is using 2.6.15.2 kernel with TLS patched.
I upgraded UML from Fedora Core 3 to Fedora Core 4. Before upgrade:
UML was using 2.6.11.7-bb2 kernel.
I upgrade this UML by doing:
1. put 2.6.
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 18:05, D. Bahi wrote:
> Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Wednesday 05 April 2006 05:59, D. Bahi wrote:
> >> Jeff Dike wrote:
> it doesn't eat the umid= arg (no uml_utilities on the host?)
> not_dead_yet : couldn't open pid file
> '/home/rtrsvcs/dbahi/.uml/happy/pid', err = 1
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 18:05, D. Bahi wrote:
> Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Wednesday 05 April 2006 05:59, D. Bahi wrote:
> >> Jeff Dike wrote:
> argh. sorry about that misdirection. is the right include to
> fix the problem.
Happy that it's enough...
> it doesn't eat the umid= arg (no uml_ut
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 03:47, David Lang wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 07:51:33PM +0100, John Parsons wrote:
> >> Does skas3 work with AMD64?
> > On x86_64, add noprocmm to the command line if it tries to run in
> > skas3 mode. In your case, it's no
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 11:59:12PM -0400, D. Bahi wrote:
> i found that i had to add the attached patch - to handle errno usage in
> tls.c
> it seems that includes and if this is
> getting
> resolved to the system header area (which it seems to be) it doesn't get the
> EVALUE macros or the extern
Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 April 2006 05:59, D. Bahi wrote:
>
>> Jeff Dike wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 04:48:20PM -0400, D. Bahi wrote:
>>>
arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.c: In function 'get_thread_regs':
<...snip...>
arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 14:46, maheswar reddy wrote:
> hi
>
> i am able 2 run (ping & telnet) as many instance as poosible.
> aslo running OSPF router software in each of VIRTUAL MACHINE.
>
> i am not able 2 connect those routers ?
>
> menas not exchanging routing protocol packets ?
>
>
> please
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 22:31, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 07:51:33PM +0100, John Parsons wrote:
> > Does skas3 work with AMD64?
>
> On x86_64, add noprocmm to the command line if it tries to run in
> skas3 mode. In your case, it's not seeing any skas3, so that's not an
> issue.
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 05:59, D. Bahi wrote:
> Jeff Dike wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 04:48:20PM -0400, D. Bahi wrote:
> >> arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.c: In function 'get_thread_regs':
> >> <...snip...>
> >> arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/registers.c:139: error: 'JB_BP' undeclared
> >
hi
i am able 2 run (ping & telnet) as many instance as poosible.
aslo running OSPF router software in each of VIRTUAL MACHINE.
i am not able 2 connect those routers ?
menas not exchanging routing protocol packets ?
please help
> Did you do this on a brand new kernel source tree?
Yep, brand new directory, unzipped from source bz2 then patched with 2.6.16-bb1
> Can you post the commands you used and gcc/glibc/kernel-headers
> versions?
Sorry to be dumb, you want package versions right? :
gcc 3.3
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 09:59 +0100, John Parsons wrote:
> I can't even get UML to build using "make ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386". It dies early
> on with the following errors:
(...)
> Does this mean I need to be in the 32-bit chroot after all? Or am I missing
> some dev libraries?
Did you do this on a bra
I can't even get UML to build using "make ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386". It dies early
on with the following errors:
arch/um/sys-i386/user-offsets.c: In function `foo':
arch/um/sys-i386/user-offsets.c:51: error: invalid application of `sizeof' to
incomplete type `user_fxsr_struct'
arch/um/sys-i386/user-o
19 matches
Mail list logo
