Re: [uml-user] SKAS already in 2.6?

2005-09-28 Thread Nelson Castillo
> Is there a SKAS0 UML binary download > available anywhere? Checking for the skas3 patch in the host...not found UML running in SKAS0 mode Checking PROT_EXEC mmap in /tmp...OK http://pwp.etb.net.co/arhuaco/uml/ If you try the kernel, let me know if it works. Regards. -- Homepage : http://geoc

Re: [uml-user] SKAS already in 2.6?

2005-09-28 Thread Robin Lee Powell
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 06:48:49PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 02:37:54PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > I notice that in 2.6.9 and up, UML is built-in, and that said > > built-in UML has SKAS support options. > > > > Does this mean that these kernels also have the SKAS p

Re: [uml-user] SKAS already in 2.6?

2005-09-28 Thread Jeff Dike
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 02:37:54PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > I notice that in 2.6.9 and up, UML is built-in, and that said > built-in UML has SKAS support options. > > Does this mean that these kernels also have the SKAS patch built-in > if compiled without ARCH=um? No. However, starting

[uml-user] SKAS already in 2.6?

2005-09-28 Thread Robin Lee Powell
I notice that in 2.6.9 and up, UML is built-in, and that said built-in UML has SKAS support options. Does this mean that these kernels also have the SKAS patch built-in if compiled without ARCH=um? -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Lear

Re: [uml-user] segmantation fault

2005-09-28 Thread Vincent Guffens
Hi, It has nothing to do with UML by itself. The module hostap_uml has been modified in order to provide a realistic wireless interface to UML but it has not been widely tested and it has bugs anyway which are completely independent from uml. For instance, it *will* crash uml if you try to insert

Re: [uml-user] Which UML to use?

2005-09-28 Thread Nelson Castillo
On 9/28/05, Robin Lee Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 02:18:40PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > > On Tuesday 27 September 2005 22:08, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > > Where is the best place to get a 2.4.x UML? I just need the > > > "linux" command itself. > > > > Don't know

Re: [uml-user] Crash vs. hang vs. no network == no UML

2005-09-28 Thread Robin Lee Powell
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 12:40:03PM -0400, Allen Chan wrote: > On Wednesday 28 September 2005 01:48 am, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > It would, of course, be nice if tuntap worked for me, but in the > > meantime this is quite sufficient for my needs. > > Are you using tuntap or the switch daemon? If

Re: [uml-user] SIOCSIFFLAGS: No such file or directory

2005-09-28 Thread Robin Lee Powell
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 06:52:00PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > On Wednesday 28 September 2005 01:09, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 06:49:04PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 03:15:55PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell > > > wrote: > > > > ./um-linux-local-2.6.13.

Re: [uml-user] Crash with SKAS

2005-09-28 Thread Nelson Castillo
On 9/28/05, Robin Lee Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 10:04:01AM +0200, chikh omar wrote: > > > > use a root_fs provided by VNUML project and it will work (i > > tested) > > I can't find out from their information what OS the root FS is. I > have little interest in work

Re: [uml-user] UML guest hangs on sshd

2005-09-28 Thread Robin Lee Powell
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 02:06:19PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > On Tuesday 27 September 2005 20:52, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 09:30:53PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 09:13:15PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 05:2

Re: [uml-user] Which UML to use?

2005-09-28 Thread Robin Lee Powell
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 02:18:40PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote: > On Tuesday 27 September 2005 22:08, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > Where is the best place to get a 2.4.x UML? I just need the > > "linux" command itself. > > Don't know for binaries, but for sources... I was asking about binaries. > >

Re: [uml-user] Crash with SKAS

2005-09-28 Thread Robin Lee Powell
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 10:04:01AM +0200, chikh omar wrote: > > use a root_fs provided by VNUML project and it will work (i > tested) I can't find out from their information what OS the root FS is. I have little interest in working with a machine that doesn't have apt or something comparable. D

Re: [uml-user] segmantation fault

2005-09-28 Thread Blaisorblade
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 16:17, cheikhrouhou wrote: > i used a precompiled kernel and a root_fs from the > site:http://www.inma.ucl.ac.be/~guffens/uml-wifi/ > > this work well with FC2 but with FC4 it not work. > when i boot and then i modprobe hostap_uml it shows : > usermode:~# modprobe ho

Re: [uml-user] SIOCSIFFLAGS: No such file or directory

2005-09-28 Thread Blaisorblade
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 01:09, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 06:49:04PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 03:15:55PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > > ./um-linux-local-2.6.13.2 mem=128M ubd0=Debian-3.0r2.ext3 > > > con=null con0=fd:0,fd:1 con1=none et

Re: [uml-user] Crash vs. hang vs. no network == no UML

2005-09-28 Thread Allen Chan
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 01:48 am, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > It would, of course, be nice if tuntap worked for me, but in the > meantime this is quite sufficient for my needs. > > -Robin Are you using tuntap or the switch daemon? If you are using the switch daemon from the default debian u

[uml-user] segmantation fault

2005-09-28 Thread cheikhrouhou
i used a precompiled kernel and a root_fs from the site:http://www.inma.ucl.ac.be/~guffens/uml-wifi/ this work well with FC2 but with FC4 it not work. when i boot and then i modprobe hostap_uml it shows : usermode:~# modprobe hostap_uml Kernel panic: Kernel mode fault at addr 0x0, ip 0xa019a0d3

[uml-user] segmantation fault

2005-09-28 Thread cheikhrouhou
i compiled a uml kernel 2.4.24 on FC with gcc-4.0.0 and the compilation hang. i searched in the web and i understand that the problem is the gcc-4. thus i installed gcc-3.3.3 wich come with FC2. the compilation succeed. But when i boot it shows. [EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.4.24]# ./linux ubd0=cow1,.

Re: [uml-user] UML/SKAS3 broken in 2.6.13-bs1, fixed up, sorry

2005-09-28 Thread Joel Palmius
Host was same, ie uname: Linux ligur.student.mh.se 2.6.13.1-skas3-v9-pre7 #1 SMP Sat Sep 10 14:19:29 CEST 2005 x86_64 AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 244 AuthenticAMD This time it even said in the boot log it ran in SKAS3. :-) So, yes. I am pretty sure I've booted a slackware image in skas3 mode on

Re: [uml-user] Which UML to use?

2005-09-28 Thread Blaisorblade
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 22:08, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > Where is the best place to get a 2.4.x UML? I just need the "linux" > command itself. Don't know for binaries, but for sources... > Were is it most up-to-date? Use my 2.4.28-bs2 patch, on top of latest 2.4 (currently 2.4.31, soon 2.4.3

Re: [uml-user] More gentoo

2005-09-28 Thread Blaisorblade
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 21:09, Joel Palmius wrote: > I always start the uml/skas0 test case via a script, which contains: > > nice linux32 ./linux-2613-2 ubd0=root_fs ubd1=swap_fs > eth0=tuntap,,,192.168.10.254 mode=skas0 mem=256m rw > (Isn't this the right way to ask for skas0 mode?) No, it

Re: [uml-user] UML guest hangs on sshd

2005-09-28 Thread Blaisorblade
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 20:52, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 09:30:53PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 09:13:15PM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 05:24:30PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell > > > wrote: > > > > However, as soon as I

Re: [uml-user] UML/SKAS3 broken in 2.6.13-bs1, fixed up, sorry

2005-09-28 Thread Blaisorblade
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 22:21, Joel Palmius wrote: > Whups, wrong script. Well, it works with 2.6.13.2-bs2 too: > > Linux version 2.6.13.2-bs2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version > 3.3.5-20050130 (Gentoo 3.3.5.20050130-r1, ssp-3.3.5.20050130-1, > pie-8.7.7.1)) #1 Tue Sep 27 13:36:10 Local time z

Re: [uml-user] UML/SKAS3 broken in 2.6.13-bs1, fixed up, sorry

2005-09-28 Thread Blaisorblade
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 19:39, Blaisorblade wrote: > On Monday 26 September 2005 15:08, Joel Palmius wrote: > > Update: I've now tested -bs2, and the same thing happens with skas0 and > > skas3 on my root_fs, ie I get a busy hang at mounting root. > > Again - forgot skas3 on a 64-bit host. Doe

Re: [uml-user] UML Fedora Core3 Boot Failed

2005-09-28 Thread Blaisorblade
On Monday 26 September 2005 20:10, Louai Al-Awami wrote: > Hi all, > > I ran my UML with Kernel 2.6.8 on RH8 and root_fs for FC2 and it worked all > fine. You didn't experience any bug maybe, but upgrading is still recommended. Be aware that you'll likely need to update /etc/inittab if you disable

Re: [uml-user] More gentoo

2005-09-28 Thread Blaisorblade
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 19:45, Blaisorblade wrote: > On Tuesday 27 September 2005 16:02, Joel Palmius wrote: > > Lengthy.. Summary is that on an amd64 host, uml hangs on skas0 mode if > > the host kernel has been patched with -v9-pre7. > > Using an unpatched vanilla > > host kernel, skas0 boo

Re: [uml-user] More gentoo

2005-09-28 Thread Joel Palmius
Sorry for spamming about gentoo.. :-) I'm now stuck at getting a functional system up and running. The problem I have is a catch 22: I cannot run an athlon-xp tarball in skas0 because it complains with the dreaded "cannot set up LDT for thread-local storage", and I don't want to run a tarball