Hi and thank you for help!
2005/8/12, Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 02:12:20PM +0300, V?is?nen Teemu wrote:
> > After many messages it goes to login -screen, but after that or in that it
> > says:
> >
> > INIT: Id "4" respawning too fast: disabled for 5 minutes
>
> Wha
Ernie , your mail was helpful , with the help of your
mail and some help from Jeff Dike at IRC , i got past
this issue , till the point where now i come to the
login prompt but then after giving the correct user
name and password , it gives the error of "ile: unable
to allocate pty/tty pair" see de
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 05:04:46PM +0200, uml wrote:
> I'm trying to restrict the access for hostfs. When starting the
> uml-kernel with the option "hostfs=/some/directory" I can mount this
> directory with the command "mount none /mnt/host -t hostfs". But I am
> still able to mount the hosts "/" w
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 12:45:20PM +, Marco Garc?s wrote:
> No, the root_fs has enough space i know 4 sure! :( any more ideas?
A sparse root_fs with no space left on the host filesystem?
Jeff
---
SF.Net
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 02:12:20PM +0300, V?is?nen Teemu wrote:
> # ./linux26 mem=160M ubd0=cow,root_fs.2005060501 ubd1=swap
> root=/dev/ubd/0 con=pty con0=fd:0,fd:1
>
> It seems to start, altought there seems to be at least one problem:
> ...
> Starting udev: MAKEDEV: error making /dev/cpu/0/mi
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 06:17:03PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> - Opteron Support
> I shall setup several services on a Dual Opteron 250. I came across some
> issues with Opterons and I wonder if Opterons are ok for UML? Are they
> stable? Or ist this a problem with 64 Bit Mode only and UML
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 10:13:32AM +0300, V?is?nen Teemu wrote:
> And there are REALLY MANY problems/errors, like
> ...
> /boot/config-2.6.9-1.667:2243: trying to assign nonexisting symbol
> USB_SERIAL_KEYSPAN_USA19W
make mrproper
make mrproper ARCH=um
cp arch/um/defconfig .config
then do your c
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 01:25:12PM +0100, Ajitabh Pandey wrote:
> I am on Ubuntu 5.04 (kernel 2.6.10). I have downloaded the 2.6.10 kernel from
>
> kernel.org and did the following:
>
I would try something newer. 2.6.10 is fairly old at this poin
Hi,
I tried to compile the guest kernel using linux-2.6.12.3 (from
kernel.org) and the patch: uml-2.6.12-bb10-skas0.patch.bz2
but all I got were the following errors:
-- snip --
arch/um/kernel/built-in.o(.text+0x78da): In function `linux_main':
arch/um/kernel/um_arch.c:352: undefined reference
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, eric leitner wondered:
> - SKAS / TT
> Is SKAS really worth the trouble? I mean is the performance better? Or
> are there other issues why one should use SKAS Mode?
Drastically better performance, easier debuggability, lower load on the
host, better security. Use it unless you
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 05:52:39PM +, Marco Garces wrote:
> How exactly do i use static device nodes instead of udev? sorry.. but
> im a newbie on this
I'd suggest you do three things:
First, try another guest image to make sure that works - particularly if
it might fulfill your needs. T
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ruaidhri Power <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Aug 11, 2005 3:20 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: [uml-user] booting
To: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 03:02:44PM +, Marco Garcs wrote:
> Nope.. left the root_fs mounted on loop, a
Hi,
I'm taking a look at UML for the first time and I'm wondering about a few
things. Would be great to hear some experiences.
- SKAS / TT
Is SKAS really worth the trouble? I mean is the performance better? Or are
there other issues why one should use SKAS Mode?
- Opteron Support
I shall setu
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 03:02:44PM +, Marco Garcs wrote:
> Nope.. left the root_fs mounted on loop, and did a watch "df -i", and
> this is what i see:
>
> /uml/root_fs 0 0 0- /uml/loop
Are you sure you're mounting the filesystem correctly? This is how I do
it o
I'm trying to restrict the access for hostfs. When starting the
uml-kernel with the option "hostfs=/some/directory" I can mount this
directory with the command "mount none /mnt/host -t hostfs". But I am
still able to mount the hosts "/" with the command "mount none /mnt/host
-t hostfs -o /"
I thoug
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ruaidhri Power <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Aug 11, 2005 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: [uml-user] booting
To: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 12:45:20PM +, Marco Garcs wrote:
> No, the root_fs has enough space i know 4
I had a similar problem.
Here's how I fixed it:
1) Boot your UML with this option added on the command line: init=/bin/sh
2) That should allow you to poke around in /dev. Check for terminals (eg.
tty0, tty1, tty/0, tty/1).
3) If there are none, and if you are using DevFS - which I suspect you are
Right, recompile the guest.
If and when you get to recompiling the host, note that the UML patch and the
SKAS patch cannot coincide on a kernel, so you need to patch another vanilla
kernel with the SKAS patch.
To keep it straight:
Guest
- Kernel with UML patch (preferably a "bs" version - for "Bl
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 12:45:20PM +, Marco Garcs wrote:
> No, the root_fs has enough space i know 4 sure! :( any more
> ideas?
Could the filesystem have run out of inodes? Use `df -i' to check.
--
Ruaidhri
---
SF.Net email is Spon
On 8/10/05, Nelson Castillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [ oops ]
> >
> > * The "tar" command failed with error:
> >
> > rd/c6d27p4: Cannot mknod: No space left on device
> > tar: rd/c6d27p5: Cannot mknod: No space left on device
> > tar: rd/c6d27p6: Cannot mknod: No space left on device
> > tar
Hi, here is my UML starting log:
# ./linux26 mem=160M ubd0=cow,root_fs.2005060501 ubd1=swap
root=/dev/ubd/0 con=pty con0=fd:0,fd:1
Checking for the skas3 patch in the host...not found
Checking for /proc/mm...not found
Checking PROT_EXEC mmap in /tmp...OK
Linux version 2.6.10-rc2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
I am on Ubuntu 5.04 (kernel 2.6.10). I have downloaded the 2.6.10 kernel from
kernel.org and did the following:
Hello,
i am also seeing similar problem.
my host kernel is 2.6.9-1.667
i downloaded the kernel version 2.6.12.3 from
kernel.org and built it for ARCH=um after enabling
virtual block devices.
Then i used the root_fs_toms1.7.205.bz2 filesystem
guest file from
http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.ne
Hi.
I am trying to start UML.
I have Fedora Core 3 and 2.6.9-1.667 -kernel installed.
I have followed
http://www.stearns.org/uml-root/root_fs.fc-3-base.pristine.20050605.note
instructions,
I downloaded root filesystem for FC3:
root_fs.fc-3-base.pristine.20050605.bz2
from
http://www.stearns.org
Thanks Mikael!
This is still a problem:
> >>Problem is, that if I save .config -file in menuconfig/xconfig etc.,
> >>lines which caused errors before, disappear. Without ARCH=um
> >>-parameter they work fine.
>
> I _think_ that's because en uml guest kernel doesn't use those symbols
> in the ker
Hello,
Now I'm a UML newbie too, so please correct me if I'm wrong...
Väisänen Teemu wrote:
I haven't put new root filesystem yet. I have downloaded necessary
files from http://www.stearns.org/uml-root/ but not yet installad
them. Is new root filesystem needed before compiling UML kernel?
No,
Hi.
More info about my problem.
I haven't put new root filesystem yet. I have downloaded necessary
files from http://www.stearns.org/uml-root/ but not yet installad
them. Is new root filesystem needed before compiling UML kernel?
-Teemu Väisänen
2005/8/11, Väisänen Teemu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi, I have couple of questions about compiling a new UML-kernel.
I loaded linux-2.6.9.tar.gz and uncompressed it to /uml/ -folder (so
there are /uml/linux-2.6.9/ -folder.
No patches are applied yet.
I loaded uml-2.6.9-bs7.patch.bz2 to /uml/linux-2.6.9/ -folder and
applied it in the same folder:
28 matches
Mail list logo
