Re: [uml-user] unresolved errors while building UML kernel

2005-05-22 Thread Dinesh Ahuja
Ian, > Please supply to the list the version of the kernel > you are using what UML patches you are using (if any) > and your compiler version. The details are as follows: 1. Host Kernel : 2.4.20-6 [ default kernel with Red Hat 8.0]. My host kernel is not vanilla kernel and I have not applied S

Re: [uml-user] unresolved errors while building UML kernel

2005-05-22 Thread Ian McDonald
Please supply to the list the version of the kernel you are using, what UML patches you are using (if any) and your compiler version. On 23/05/05, Dinesh Ahuja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All. > > I am new to UML world and facing problem while > building UML kernel. Lots of unresolved errors

[uml-user] unresolved errors while building UML kernel

2005-05-22 Thread Dinesh Ahuja
Hi All. I am new to UML world and facing problem while building UML kernel. Lots of unresolved errors are coming and they are as follows : vmlinux.o(.text+0x1517c4): In function `fn_hash_delete': : undefined reference to `fn_key_eq' vmlinux.o(.text+0x1519e6): In function `fn_hash_flush': : undefin

[uml-user] Error while compiling UML Kernel

2005-05-22 Thread Dinesh Ahuja
Hi All, I am trying to compile the UML kernel by patching vanilla kernel 2.4.20 with uml patch uml-patch-2.4.20-4.bz2. My host kernel is 2.4.20-6 [ which is default with RH8.0] After cleaning and running xconfig, i am facing following problem while running make linux ARCH=um Please advise on b

Re: [uml-user] Unkillable "linux" process.

2005-05-22 Thread Cliff Pratt
On 5/22/05, Rus Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 22 May 2005, Cliff Pratt wrote: > > > OS: Debian > > Host kernel: 2.6.10, self-compiled, no SKAS patch, nothing else unusual. > > UML: 2.4.26-3um-1 > > > > Because of a misconfiguration I had to kill a UML instance, which > > didn't respo

Re: [uml-user] Unkillable "linux" process.

2005-05-22 Thread Cliff Pratt
On 5/22/05, Robin Lee Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 06:17:48PM +1200, Cliff Pratt wrote: > > kill 1224 and kill -9 1224 both return without affecting the task. > > If kill -9, *as root*, does not kill a process, you have hit a > kernel bug. Period. You should probab

Re: [uml-user] Unkillable "linux" process.

2005-05-22 Thread Robin Lee Powell
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 06:17:48PM +1200, Cliff Pratt wrote: > kill 1224 and kill -9 1224 both return without affecting the task. If kill -9, *as root*, does not kill a process, you have hit a kernel bug. Period. You should probably reboot. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *