On Tue, 17 May 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] suggested tentatively:
> On Tue, 17 May 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] yowled:
>>So, we could conditionalize that (maybe -D_SEARCH_PATH=). I'm
>> not going to merge it in this form, so send me the cleaned up version.
>
> If I could work out what to
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 03:01, Jeff Dike wrote:
> ... commenting on bits and pieces of this thread...
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 12:17:38AM +0100, Nix wrote:
> > eee-ick. That'll really collide nastily with glibc's assumption that
> > errno is located in thread-local storage, I fear.
>
> It's sort
... commenting on bits and pieces of this thread...
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 12:17:38AM +0100, Nix wrote:
> eee-ick. That'll really collide nastily with glibc's assumption that
> errno is located in thread-local storage, I fear.
It's sort of necessary (or some nasty trick is) because UML (re)maps
On Monday 16 May 2005 20:27, Marcio Scheibler wrote:
> Comments below...
Read the typo message?
> In future maybe I'll try later kernels and other ways to get more volumes,
> UBD partitions, nested LVM, etc...
> For while thanks for all assistence.
>
> > > VFS: Mounted root (cramfs filesystem) rea
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 01:46, Blaisorblade wrote:
> Also, about TLS and such: do you know where I can download the userspace
> example code?
Here I refer to futexes, sorry.
> I'd like to use some kind of semaphores in UML for
> cooperation between host threads. Currently it suspends by read/writi
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 01:17, Nix wrote:
> On Tue, 17 May 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] yowled:
> > On Saturday 14 May 2005 14:00, Nix wrote:
> >> At any rate, specifying the paths explicitly won't do any harm
> >> anywhere. :)
> >
> > On 2.6 we just removed -L/usr/lib from the linker command line becau
On Saturday 14 May 2005 14:00, Nix wrote:
> On Sat, 14 May 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] prattled cheerily:
> > On Saturday 14 May 2005 13:00, Nix wrote:
> >> On Sat, 14 May 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] whispered secretively:
> >> > On Saturday 14 May 2005 02:00, Nix wrote:
> >> >> On Sat, 14 May 2005, [EMAIL
On Tue, 17 May 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] yowled:
> On Saturday 14 May 2005 14:00, Nix wrote:
>> At any rate, specifying the paths explicitly won't do any harm
>> anywhere. :)
> On 2.6 we just removed -L/usr/lib from the linker command line because of
> some warnings.
EXPN? (Are they serious? What
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Data: May 12, 2005 5:16:38 PM
A: user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Ogg: [uml-user] easiest distro to get UML running on
Sorry for sounding like a total newbie, but I'm doing a presentation on
UML tonight for my LUG group, and while I have it r
FC3 works fine as guest ?
Itamar Reis Peixoto
+55 (34) 3238 3845
e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://vps.ispbrasil.com.br --->>> servidores linux
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer
Aaargh
"The same old thing happens every new day..."
How many time has this list seen this mistake before ?
Sorry... sorry... sorry... sorry
... and many, many, many Thanks.
2005/5/16, Wim Bonis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Kernel command line: uml_dir=/var/run/uml mem=128m devfs=nomount
>
Comments below...
2005/5/16, Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > Kernel command line: uml_dir=/var/run/uml mem=128m devfs=nomount
> > con0=null,fd:1 con=pts root=/dev/ubda
> > initrd=/var/local/initrd/uml-jfs-2.6.10.initrd ramdisk_size=16384
> > ubd0s=/dev/vg01/uml01_fs_root ubd1s=/dev/vg01/
On Monday 16 May 2005 20:11, Wim Bonis wrote:
> > Kernel command line: uml_dir=/var/run/uml mem=128m devfs=nomount
> > con0=null,fd:1 con=pts root=/dev/ubda
> > initrd=/var/local/initrd/uml-jfs-2.6.10.initrd
> > ramdisk_size=16384 ubd0s=/dev/vg01/uml01_fs_root
> > ubd1s=/dev/vg01/uml01_fs_var ubd2s
> Kernel command line: uml_dir=/var/run/uml mem=128m devfs=nomount
> con0=null,fd:1 con=pts root=/dev/ubda
> initrd=/var/local/initrd/uml-jfs-2.6.10.initrd
> ramdisk_size=16384 ubd0s=/dev/vg01/uml01_fs_root
> ubd1s=/dev/vg01/uml01_fs_var ubd2s=/dev/vg01/uml01_fs_usr
> ubd3s=/dev/vg01/uml01_fs_ho
On Monday 16 May 2005 15:14, Marcio Scheibler wrote:
> Sorry,
> Forget to reply also to list...
> Hi,
>
> I use host logical volumes (LVM) as UBD devices in UML.
> UML's user at host owns volumes nodes at host's /dev.
> I'd like to stress that once running and after I add ubd6 with
> uml_mconsole
On Monday 16 May 2005 19:04, Ashwin Kumar Tanugula wrote:
> hi!
> I have a question regarding applying a uml patch. Can i apply a uml
> 2.6.0-test9 patch to a linux 2.6.8.1-4 kernel?
No, I can bet it won't compile without testing. Why don't you use the 2.6.8.1
patch, or even a later kernel?
Also,
hi!
I have a question regarding applying a uml patch. Can i apply a uml
2.6.0-test9 patch to a linux 2.6.8.1-4 kernel? should the uml patch
version and kernel version be the same always??
Thanks,
Ashwin
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Or
On 5/15/05, Gianni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, I can't setup quota in UML.
> I get the following error :
>
> -bash-2.05b# /sbin/quotaon -a
> quotaon: using //aquota.group on /dev/ubd/0 [/]: No such process
> quotaon: Quota format not supported in kernel.
When I set up quotas in a UML, I h
Sorry,
Forget to reply also to list...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Marcio Scheibler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 16/05/2005 09:49
Subject: Re: [uml-user] six UBD devices barrier at startup ??
To: Blaisorblade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
I use host logical volumes (LVM) as UBD device
19 matches
Mail list logo
