hi,
Some basic questions,
some of these has been answered several times on this list but asking again
as i have roasted my system twice already and not successful in getting
the UML up and running.
* Does latest linux kernel sources
from kernel.org (2.6.11 or above) has the UML host patches
hi, i met i stranger network problem
umls use tuntap network ,
and it works ok.
but after some times from the out side ,can't ping or ssh or ftp it,
then from the host ping the uml,and it replys after that ,from the outside
can ping it and ftp and so on.
what 's the problem .
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi ,all .
i have a problem. i want to start uml read-only ,but can't it
reports :
Checking root filesystem
Disk write-protected; use the -n option to do a read-only
check of the device.
[/sbin/fsck.ext3 (1) -- /] fsck.ext3 -a /dev/ubd/0
fsck.ext3
Rick,
This is a security question in addition to a management question. For example,
assume that one of your guest instances is eventually compromised. Will it
matter if the attacker can freely access the file system of the other
instances? If so, then you should look at creating separate accou
I'm currently working on getting multiple UMLs up and
going on a single host.
What I am currently wrestling with now is the following:
Should each UML instance be run from a separate user account
on the host or should you use a single user to launch all the UML instances?
I am t
Given how often this has come up recently, should we add something about the
most "stable" or "suggested" kernel combinations to the wiki? Of course, this
would require someone to keep it updated as new releases come out... :)
Tony
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 04/26/05 01:56AM >>>
> Hello, i have to
Suresh wrote:
hi,
So in case of uml, if all the interrupts are being handled in the
processor 0, hence
softirq and tasklets are going to be handled in processor 0. If this is
the case,
then don't you think that smp functionality is lost here. Kindly tell
me, is that the case
even in 2.4.20 kerne
Hi.
I'm having trouble compiling Linux (2.4.27) on my machine.
I'm using the source: linux-2.4.27.tar.bz2 that I got from kernel.org
and uml-patch-2.4.27-1.bz2
After I applied the patch I compiled it using the following commands and
stuck with the defaults with the configuration:
#make xconfig
At 06:52 PM 4/26/2005, Vincent Guffens wrote:
Suresh wrote:
hi,
So in case of uml, if all the interrupts are being handled in the
processor 0, hence
softirq and tasklets are going to be handled in processor 0. If this is
the case,
then don't you think that smp functionality is lost here. Kindly t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi all .
i am confused with the switches of the kernel .
could someone tell me the ubd0s the "s" append means what ?
jack
-BEGIN PGP SIGN
Shavian Shakes wrote:
> I am trying to get multiple UML instances talk to each other using a
> bridge.
> Any help, pointers or doc/sites references will be a great help.
Please try and see if http://edeca.net/articles/bridging/ helps you at
all. You can do this with public or private interfaces
Hi, I'm also fight with the "load-avg" issue. I found some mails
regarding this on the mailing list - here something from my side
about this...
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 Blaisorblade wrote:
> The patch I suggested to Chris was named, in the patch,
> "update-process-times", however the name in my t
Hi Paolo
On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 21:15 +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Monday 25 April 2005 10:31, Andree Leidenfrost wrote:
> > Hi Paolo
> >
> > Thanks a lot for your response and suggestions! I think the handling of
> > the fpx registers' absence is the key - see attached patch. But please
> > rea
hi,
So in case of uml, if all the interrupts are being handled in the processor
0, hence
softirq and tasklets are going to be handled in processor 0. If this is the
case,
then don't you think that smp functionality is lost here. Kindly tell me,
is that the case
even in 2.4.20 kernel. In the dair
hi,
with uml smp support, only processor 0 is processing interrupts. This is
described there:
http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/diary.html (25 Jul 2002)
It is quite old but I tried not so long ago and I could see in
/proc/interrupt that is was indeed the case.
cheers,
Suresh wrote:
Hi
I
Hi
I brought up uml with smp support. I used the vanilla kernel 2.4.20 and
the patch uml-patch-2.4.20-1.bz2.
I wrote a small kernel module.
This module registers to netfilter hooks. and the netfilter callback
function has the following callback functionality.
if(smp_processor_id() == 0)
spin_lock
Hello, i have to set-up a multi guest UML
server.
Is better skas-2.6.11-v8.patch or
skas-2.6.11-v9-pre1.patch
for the HOST Kernel ?
For Guests, can i use both 2.4.x and 2.6.x Uml
kernels ? Or only 2.6.x ?
Thanks
Enrico
17 matches
Mail list logo
