At 06:52 PM 4/26/2005, Vincent Guffens wrote:

Suresh wrote:

hi,
So in case of uml, if all the interrupts are being handled in the processor 0, hence
softirq and tasklets are going to be handled in processor 0. If this is the case,
then don't you think that smp functionality is lost here. Kindly tell me, is that the case
even in 2.4.20 kernel. In the dairy it was given that it is for 2.5 kernel.
Performance may not be an issue to me, so that I can simulate SMP functionality that
host linux offers.

With UML-SMP, you may have multiple processes running simultaneously. For instance, here is a top from an SMP-UML machine:


3:36pm  up 4 min,  4 users,  load average: 0.04, 0.02, 0.00
 37 processes: 33 sleeping, 4 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped

    PID USER     PRI  NI  SIZE  RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM   TIME COMMAND
    156 root      14   0   376  376   316 R    14.4  1.2   0:01 md5sum
    155 root      11   0   376  376   316 R    12.6  1.2   0:01 md5sum
    154 root      13   0   376  376   316 R    12.2  1.2   0:01 md5sum
    153 root      10   0   920  920   728 R     0.1  3.1   0:00 top


But from what I understand, the interrupt paths may run only on processor 0 so there is no SMP capability from that point of view. Maybe thinks have changed since I tried. This was with 2.4.24-um1 in tt mode.


However, I don't know if softirq and tasklet may run only on processor 0 as interrupts do. Can't these be schedulled on another processor ?

Suppose if interrupts handled only in cpu0. When ever a packet comes to the nic, then
isr runs on cpu0. This isr will queue the packet to the cpu0 backlog queue, and a softirq is
raised and isr returns. This softirq which is raised on cpu0 will only run on cpu0.


In case of tasklets also, if the tasklets are scheduled from interrupts, then the will be
will on the processor on which they are scheduled.


How ever if the tasklets are scheduled from the threads, and the threads are attached to
another processor, then the scheduled tasklets can run on any other processor on which
it is scheduled.
With this most of the kernel functionality seems to run only in cpu0 context.


thanks for the information.

regards
Suresh



Cheers,


-- Vincent Guffens PhD Student UCL/CESAME tel: +32 10 47 80 30 Value your freedom, or you will lose it, teaches history. "Don't bother us with politics," respond those who don't want to learn. -- Richard M. Stallman





------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-user mailing list User-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-user

Reply via email to