I have followed the yum instructions found on a Xen discussion in Redhat
Magazine to get an FC3 root_fs:
http://www.redhat.com/magazine/004feb05/features/virtualization/
The difference being that I didn't run the MAKEDEV script but just
copied my hosts' /dev directory over.
(If this was a bad ide
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 19:01, Jan Rychter wrote:
> > Blaisorblade wrote:
> > > On Sunday 03 April 2005 13:48, Jan Rychter wrote:
> > > > I used UML successfully in the past and recently I've tried to revive
> > > > my UML installation. Unfortunately, I've run into a range of problems
> > > > (upd
> Can you say which tree you used?
The host machine is
2.6.11.6-skas3-v9-pre1 which is 2.6.11.6 + skas-2.6.11-v9-pre1.patch
Guest is 2.4.29 + your latest patches
Rus
--
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : t: 01635 281120
http://www.vaserv.com - Servers from $69/mo
http://www.storemypic.com - Free Image H
> Blaisorblade wrote:
> > On Sunday 03 April 2005 13:48, Jan Rychter wrote:
> > > I used UML successfully in the past and recently I've tried to revive my
> > > UML installation. Unfortunately, I've run into a range of problems
> > > (updates required for newer host kernels, non-working hostfs, etc
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 08:44, Rus Foster wrote:
> I've just compiled up a 2.4.29 guest kernel and having a problem that is
> typing "reboot" the guest does more of a power off than a reboot. Anyone
> got a fix for this?
Does it hangs or crashes? If it hangs, then you must avoid using a
2.6.9/2.6
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 14:23, Peter wrote:
> The 2.6.11 guest kernels I tried all had 100% CPU in hardware interupts.
> I saw someone else report this as well.
Yes, I saw them too, but I haven't yet started trying to track it down - also
it seemed from the reports that this does not create pra
On Monday 04 April 2005 20:39, Blaisorblade wrote:
> Ok, I'm writing the patch. Use the attached one on 2.6.11 (and/or -bs1),
> nor on 2.6.9!
> I'm writing a better one for merge, which works well also for AMD64 users
> (which can't use aes-i586).
Just a note - the patch I sent yesterday in a hurry
The 2.6.11 guest kernels I tried all had 100% CPU in hardware interupts.
I saw someone else report this as well. Is this resolved in
2.6.11-bs1? (I don't recall seeing any emails in this list addressing
the hi problem, but I may have missed some).
Regards, Peter
Blaisorblade wrote:
However,
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 07:46:33PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > CONFIG_PT_PROXY=y
> Maybe you could try disabling this, and saying if it makes a difference. It's
> the only piece of code which could hide such a bug, but still this code
> shouldn't be running since it's for TT mode only.
bingo.
