RE: talking about paradigms

2004-11-17 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
es. > > > On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:59:48 -, Pilgrim, Peter > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: 16 November 2004 17:46

Re: talking about paradigms

2004-11-16 Thread Eddie Bush
Struts :-) Oh happy day! :-D - Original Message - From: "Dakota Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 10:59 PM Subject: Re: talking about paradigms No pain no big bucks. Where'

Re: talking about paradigms

2004-11-16 Thread Dakota Jack
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 9:55 AM > Subject: Re: talking about paradigms > > > Jack, > > > > What I found was that alot of Java code to generate XML (using DOM API) > > had to be added in the con

Re: talking about paradigms

2004-11-16 Thread Eddie Bush
;Bill Siggelkow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 9:55 AM Subject: Re: talking about paradigms Jack, What I found was that alot of Java code to generate XML (using DOM API) had to be added in the controller layer to facilitate the

Re: talking about paradigms

2004-11-16 Thread Don Brown
view of that data > > - and it should be > > > >>>flexible. > > > >>> > > > >>>The problem with a smarter (or better worded: more > > capable) view is that > > > >>>people start doing things in the

Re: talking about paradigms

2004-11-16 Thread Bill Siggelkow
: talking about paradigms Bill, Sounds like you don't need what XSLT provides. The important thing, I think, is to make sure that the framework leaves that option open for those that want it and does not require that option to those who do not want it. I am not privy to the details of your applic

RE: talking about paradigms

2004-11-16 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
> -Original Message- > From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 16 November 2004 17:46 > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: talking about paradigms > > > Bill, > > Sounds like you don't need what XSLT provides. The important thi

[OT] Re: talking about paradigms

2004-11-16 Thread Bill Siggelkow
it into the model as it was nicer than using java code in the jsps. There are various other methods - such as retrieving chunks of text with \n into , which can now mostly be handled with jstl. Daniel. -Original Message----- From: Rosenberg, Leon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 November

Re: talking about paradigms

2004-11-16 Thread Dakota Jack
u have getStartDate() which returns a date, and getFormattedStartDate() > >>>which returns a formatted string. This code should be in the view as it is > >>>purely for view purposes, but i made the decision to bodge it into the > >>>model > >>>as it was

Re: talking about paradigms

2004-11-16 Thread Dakota Jack
Very interesting stuff, Adam. Very interesting! I do not see the filter as determining what the view would be but merely as providing data that would become part of the workflow as kept in the View Stores. The view would decide on what it wanted to do about this information in terms of present

Re: talking about paradigms

2004-11-16 Thread Adam Hardy
Using filters and different modules for delivering different HTML for different browsers is known in the HTML/CSS world as browser sniffing, and is frowned on by the HTML designer purists, but in the real world such modules could definitely be a highly attractive. Alot would depend on what you

Re: talking about paradigms

2004-11-16 Thread Bill Siggelkow
---Original Message- From: Rosenberg, Leon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 November 2004 13:44 To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: AW: talking about paradigms No, but what about ? (not sure about the syntax). whats the problem? MVC usually allows 'read-only access to model' for

Re: AW: talking about paradigms

2004-11-16 Thread Dakota Jack
t; _pointers_ in java; if you don't believe me, try some books written by > java developers (i.e. Joshua Bloch, Effective Java Programming Language > Guide, > http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0201310058/qid=1100601935/ > sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/002-0821267-8

RE: AW: talking about paradigms

2004-11-16 Thread Daniel Perry
so damm nice to anyone who's used c! Daniel. > > Just my .2 cents > Lucas > > - Original Message - > From: "Struts User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Dakota Jack" > <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: AW: talking about paradigms

2004-11-16 Thread Dakota Jack
ing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Dakota Jack" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 11:50 AM > Subject: Re: AW: talking about paradigms > > > I agree with Jack. There are pointers everywhere in Java. Java learns > > from C++

Re: talking about paradigms, or why there are no pointer in java

2004-11-16 Thread Rosenberg, Leon
ferences. Whats next on the agenda? Explaining why there are no calls by reference in java? :-) Regards Leon > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. November 2004 15:43 > An: Struts Users Mailing List > Betreff

Re: AW: talking about paradigms

2004-11-16 Thread DGraham
PROTECTED]> To "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc Subject AW: talking about paradigms Hi Eddie, thanx for your reply, I will put it in my poetry album, and reread eat, each time I'm asking myself about the sense of the living... Sad, but my p

Re: talking about paradigms

2004-11-16 Thread Dakota Jack
Hello, Adam, You are definitely right that this is a crucial part of any web application, and not only for browsers but also for flash, javascript, etc. versions. This is so important in the overall picture for web programming that perhaps a whole separate set of interfaces amounting to a separat

Re: AW: talking about paradigms

2004-11-16 Thread Lucas Gonzalez Pearson
L PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 11:50 AM Subject: Re: AW: talking about paradigms > I agree with Jack. There are pointers everywhere in Java. Java learns > from C++ mistake by "hiding" error prone functionality such as > pointers. > > Joshua Block's

Re: AW: talking about paradigms

2004-11-16 Thread Struts User
I agree with Jack. There are pointers everywhere in Java. Java learns from C++ mistake by "hiding" error prone functionality such as pointers. Joshua Block's book is not a Java Book for beginner. It is target for experience developer. Probably you should look into Bruce Eckel's on-line book for mo

Re: AW: talking about paradigms

2004-11-16 Thread Dakota Jack
Hello, Leon, There are pointers in Java. Every object is referenced by a pointer. Indeed, how else could an object be referenced? I am not sure why you cited Joshua Bloch's book on this. There is not, as Eddie said, pointer arithmetic. Jack On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:46:05 +0100, Rosenberg, Leo

RE: talking about paradigms

2004-11-16 Thread Pilgrim, Peter
All mixed up below > -Original Message- > From: Rosenberg, Leon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 16 November 2004 10:58 > To: Struts Users Mailing List; Dakota Jack > Subject: AW: talking about paradigms > > > Hi Jack, > > I like you kind of "cas

AW: talking about paradigms

2004-11-16 Thread Rosenberg, Leon
gards Leon > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Montag, 15. November 2004 20:46 > An: Struts Users Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: talking about paradigms > > The whole discussion about MVC and web frameworks i

RE: talking about paradigms

2004-11-16 Thread Daniel Perry
CTED] > Sent: 16 November 2004 04:22 > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: talking about paradigms > > > IMHO, you have to be very careful with the XML/XSLT solution. > > I worked on a project about two years ago (probably closer to three now > actually) where we ha

AW: talking about paradigms

2004-11-16 Thread Rosenberg, Leon
on: Eddie Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. November 2004 03:26 > An: Struts Users Mailing List > Betreff: Re: talking about paradigms > > Leon, > > Being a developer is like ... being a Jedi Knight. You seek the good and > thrive on it, but are fore

Re: talking about paradigms

2004-11-16 Thread Adam Hardy
Jack, one thing you missed off the diagram is the HTML reader. A public website often has to cater for: - old browsers like Netscape 4 - text only browsers like lynx - PDA browsers with no javascript etc - spiders which ignore sessions - screen readers for the blind all of which make strong deman

Re: talking about paradigms

2004-11-16 Thread Dakota Jack
a lot of code in the model beans > >>>that was put there pre jstl for formatting things like dates, or text. So > >>>you have getStartDate() which returns a date, and getFormattedStartDate() > >>>which returns a formatted string. This code should be in the view as

Re: talking about paradigms

2004-11-15 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
de the decision to bodge it into the model as it was nicer than using java code in the jsps. There are various other methods - such as retrieving chunks of text with \n into , which can now mostly be handled with jstl. Daniel. -Original Message- From: Rosenberg, Leon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

Re: talking about paradigms

2004-11-15 Thread Dakota Jack
poses, but i made the decision to bodge it into the model > > as it was nicer than using java code in the jsps. There are various other > > methods - such as retrieving chunks of text with \n into , which can now > > mostly be handled with jstl. > > > > Daniel. > > > &g

Re: talking about paradigms

2004-11-15 Thread Eddie Bush
AMEN TO THAT. What a PITA ... UGH I don't like that! PAIN! Try to debug that mess! - Original Message - From: "Bill Siggelkow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 8:43 AM Subject: Re: talking about paradigms Sorry, I

Re: talking about paradigms

2004-11-15 Thread Eddie Bush
l, Eddie - Original Message - From: "Rosenberg, Leon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 7:44 AM Subject: AW: talking about paradigms > No, but what about > > ? > (not sure abou

Re: talking about paradigms

2004-11-15 Thread Dakota Jack
"You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep." ~Native Proverb~ "Each man is good in His sight. It is not necessary for eagles to be crows." ~Hunkesni (Sitting Bull), Hunkpapa Sioux~ > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > &g

Re: talking about paradigms

2004-11-15 Thread Bill Siggelkow
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 November 2004 13:44 To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: AW: talking about paradigms No, but what about ? (not sure about the syntax). whats the problem? MVC usually allows 'read-only access to model' for the view Also the question is, what you expose to the v

RE: talking about paradigms

2004-11-15 Thread Robert Taylor
To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: RE: talking about paradigms > > > I think the idea that MVC architecture should have a 'dumb view' is totally > wrong. The view should be as smart as possible. > > MVC should separate the M, V and C. With a really smart view yo

RE: talking about paradigms

2004-11-15 Thread Daniel Perry
13:44 > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: AW: talking about paradigms > > > > > > > No, but what about > > > > > > ? > > > (not sure about the syntax). > > whats the problem? > > MVC usually allows 'read-only access to model&

AW: talking about paradigms

2004-11-15 Thread Rosenberg, Leon
> > No, but what about > > > > ? > > (not sure about the syntax). > whats the problem? > MVC usually allows 'read-only access to model' for the view > Also the question is, what you expose to the view. > If you are afraid that somebody will misuse the library entries - don't > expose them. > I

Re: talking about paradigms

2004-11-15 Thread Axel Groß
On 2004-11-11 at 11:24:14 +0100, Rosenberg, Leon wrote: > > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > > Von: Mark Lowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. November 2004 11:04 > > An: Struts Users Mailing List > > Betreff: Re: talking about

Re: talking about paradigms

2004-11-11 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:42:27 +0100, Rosenberg, Leon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > since we started talking about paradigms... how does JSTL and especially > EL fit into MVC paradigm? > Much of JSTL is clearly about view tier stuff -- things like conditionals and l

AW: talking about paradigms

2004-11-11 Thread Rosenberg, Leon
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Mark Lowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. November 2004 11:04 > An: Struts Users Mailing List > Betreff: Re: talking about paradigms > > I don't think EL breaks the MVC pattern. Although it leaves you

Re: talking about paradigms

2004-11-11 Thread Mark Lowe
ssing view issues in your actions or even action forms. Mark On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:42:27 +0100, Rosenberg, Leon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > since we started talking about paradigms... how does JSTL and especially > EL fit into MVC paradigm? > > Or, the better qu

talking about paradigms

2004-11-11 Thread Rosenberg, Leon
Hi, since we started talking about paradigms... how does JSTL and especially EL fit into MVC paradigm? Or, the better question, why does struts support EL nowadays, when it breaks the paradigm? Regards Leon