this message.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Newton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 4:08 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: problem with checkbox
--- On Mon, 8/18/08, Muralidhar Y wrote:
> Hi , when I typed the c
--- On Mon, 8/18/08, Muralidhar Y wrote:
> Hi , when I typed the code in my jsp like the following
>
> value="one" />
>
> In the html file the following code is being shown. By
> default the attribute value is being true. Instead I want
> to give some other value. Kindly help.
>
Hi , when I typed the code in my jsp like the following
In the html file the following code is being shown. By default the attribute
value is being true. Instead I want to give some other value. Kindly help.
Warm regards,
Muralidhar Y
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
US Main: 877 KENSIUM (536
t;>
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/problem-with-checkbox-%28when-using-disabled-property%29-tp18367328p18438098.html
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would have thought would handle all of that for
you, but I guess it may not be working, or doesn't aim to.
2008/7/10 Paweł Wielgus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all,
> just yesterday i had the very same problem in rails with date field,
> so i searched for disabled definition and found this:
> http
Hi all,
just yesterday i had the very same problem in rails with date field,
so i searched for disabled definition and found this:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/interact/forms.html#successful-controls
and
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/interact/forms.html#h-17.12
It looks like disabled flag will simpl
--- On Wed, 7/9/08, Owen Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You need to have a hidden field value that will take the
> place of the disabled checkbox as some browsers do not
> send disabled field values.
The tag already includes the hidden field; I don't know what
it does for disabled checkboxe
You need to have a hidden field value that will take the place of the
disabled checkbox as some browsers do not send disabled field values.
Basically, it's just for display.
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Lukasz Lenart
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you try with some others browsers, like IE, F
Did you try with some others browsers, like IE, FF?
Regards
--
Lukasz
http://www.lenart.org.pl/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Using struts tag for a checkbox. I disable my checkbox using disabled property
so that user cannot change it. When the form is submitted, the value of the
checkbox passed to the action comes out as false, even if the checkbox was
selected (true).
The weird thing is if I remove the disabled
I'm trying to populate a list of checkboxes, some checked, some not from the
database. I followed the Husted Tip#7 but still have problem. My actionform
has 2 arrays 1 for selected (selectedFormPropertyArray), 1 for all
checkboxes (allFormPropertyArray) populated fine. But when I go to the jsp,
i
7;s unset".
kr,
guenther
--
Günther Wieser
creative-it
Guglgasse 6/1/11/1
A-1110 Wien
Austria
http://www.creative-it.com
-Original Message-
From: Cliff Lam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 4:20 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: problem with che
27;Struts Users Mailing List'"
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005 1:28 AM
Subject: problem with checkbox values and map backed properties
> hi,
>
> i have the following problem with map backed properties:
>
> i created a form bean with a map called inCampaignMap, and the gette
hi,
i have the following problem with map backed properties:
i created a form bean with a map called inCampaignMap, and the getter and
setters being "boolean getInCampaign(String key)" and "setInCampaign(String
key, boolean value)". internally, of course, the map value entries are of
type Boolean
having a checkbox with the same name as a hidden field prevented
the value from being evaluated. This was solved by putting the
script directly into the onclick method.
onclick=" if (this.checked == true) {
document.getElementById('${recordType.name}Box').style.display='block';
} else {
do
Dang it. This is not going to work for me. I have a check box.
If the check box is checked, I have some javascript looking for
the click event. If the check box has a .checked = true. I
change div's display value to block, else to none. So, you
check the check box and some radio buttons show
Now I see clearer what you were saying. I found this in the
java forums.
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=242031&messageID=2946045
It worked like a charm.
I wonder why the html:checkbox docs don't mention this.
Thanks for your help.
--- Cédric Levieux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Because when you uncheck a checkbox you don't send this field and the
form process let the previous value in place
One of tips of mine is to put a hidden field with the same name and to
see the field as an array : when it contains only one value the
checkbox is unchecked, checked otherwise
Hope i
I have a checkbox drawn by:
${recordType.description}
The form is defined as:
...
...
The check box displays correct and even defaults. If I uncheck
the box and submit, when it failes validation, it is still
checked.
=
Norris Shelton
Software Engineer
Sun Certif
Thank you, Bill, Jeff, and Wendy for all your help!
Tong
Jeff Beal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The relevant section is Section 8.8 of the specification:
"Thus when we extract a property or event name from the middle of an
existing Java name, we normally convert the first character to lower
case.
The relevant section is Section 8.8 of the specification:
"Thus when we extract a property or event name from the middle of an
existing Java name, we normally convert the first character to lower
case. However to support the occasional use of all upper-case names, we
check if the first two chara
From: "t t" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Salute you! Bill. It works! Thank you so much!
> But why? Why does the name of a property matter? Why
> does the upper case "A" matter?
Form beans need to conform to the JavaBeans specification. That's what
makes it possible for the framework to "know" what metho
Salute you! Bill. It works! Thank you so much!
But why? Why does the name of a property matter? Why
does the upper case "A" matter?
Thanks again.
Tong
--- Bill Siggelkow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe the problem is the property name in your
> ActionForm. Having a
> method named getSAll
I believe the problem is the property name in your ActionForm. Having a
method named getSAll() is going to cause problems. Make it getSall() and
then the property will be 'sall' and everything will be much happier. Or
you could try more meaningful names ;)
-Bill Siggelkow
t t wrote:
Thank you,
Thank you, Bill and Jeff,
Sorry I didn't include relevant code in my first post.
Here is the relevant code.
Code in J2:(with checkbox)
--
(with other tds)
(with other tds)
-
What's the code in J2 that you use to put the checkbox? Are you using
an tag? If so, does that tag refer to yet another action,
A3? If so, which form bean is associated with A3?
-- Jeff
t t wrote:
Hi, all,
I have JSP file J1 with form F1 inside. It is used to
accept user's input. And I wil
Tong,
While I appreciate that you are trying to present your information in a
generic manner -- it is rather difficult to know what's going on without
specifics. For checkboxes, the property needs to be a boolean. If you
cannot figure out the problem, I suggest you include the relevant
portions
Hi, all,
I have JSP file J1 with form F1 inside. It is used to
accept user's input. And I will display the result in
JSP file J2 with form F2. And there are a checkbox
and multibox in F2.
At first, I didn't associate F2 form bean with Action A1 which
is triggered in F1. I just associated F1 form
28 matches
Mail list logo
