08, 2005 10:17 AM
To: Justin Morgan
Cc: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: MVC Frameworks
For my part, I still prefer Struts because I think it has a great
potential if it endorses some move to IoC and does not fall off the
strict web MVC pattern. I have no time for the event-based framewo
ot mine at inception, or
> > > construction, I ended up with it in my lap at transition time.
> > > Unfortunately for me I had to do the apologizing/explaining :)
> > >
> > > Al
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> >
A novel way of resolving differences with management, I'd say.
I think that's generally frowned upon by most Human Resource departments.
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 07:17:54 -0800 (PST), Woodchuck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> no no no, you guys are playing the game wrong.
>
> i bring my 32oz Easton (t
]> wrote:
> > > > Yeap that is the game. I have been a first option kind of guy for
> > a long
> > > > time. This particular project was not mine at inception, or
> > > > construction, I ended up with it in my lap at transition time.
> > > > Unfort
>
> > > Al
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Simon Chappell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 8:18 AM
> > > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > > Subject: Re: MVC Framework
at inception, or
> > construction, I ended up with it in my lap at transition time.
> > Unfortunately for me I had to do the apologizing/explaining :)
> >
> > Al
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Simon Chappell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
2005 8:18 AM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: MVC Frameworks
>
> Ahh yes, the ol' architecture approval game. I have played this game
> so often that it's not even funny anymore. And it's always at big
> companies. Sigh.
>
> The only options are 1)
: Simon Chappell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 8:18 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: MVC Frameworks
Ahh yes, the ol' architecture approval game. I have played this game
so often that it's not even funny anymore. And it's always at big
compan
--Original Message-
> From: Andrew Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 9:18 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: MVC Frameworks
>
> Why would the users have trouble accepting Spring if y
Mailing List
Subject: Re: MVC Frameworks
Why would the users have trouble accepting Spring if you werent using
the MVC part - how does that impact on the UI to an extent that a user
could notice?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [
ng it, vs something else.
Al
-Original Message-
From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 10:17 AM
To: Justin Morgan
Cc: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: MVC Frameworks
For my part, I still prefer Struts because I think it has a great
potential if it
something else.
Al
-Original Message-
From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 10:17 AM
To: Justin Morgan
Cc: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: MVC Frameworks
For my part, I still prefer Struts because I think it has a great
potential if it endorses
to make anyone defensive; I'm just
> trying to get past
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Justin
>
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 3:30 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re:
SF
> > and Tapestry as well, especially regarding why one might choose one
> over
> > the other.
> >
> > It all boils down to two questions:
> > 1. Why do you prefer Struts over any other web application
> framework?
> > (Tapestry, JSF, Maverick, WebWork, et
Las Vegas, NV 89115
Phone:(702)643-7425
Fax:(702)974-0341
*Note new email changed from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 8:17 AM
To: Justin Morgan
Cc: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: MVC Frameworks
For
sive; I'm just
> trying to get past
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Justin
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 3:30 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: MVC Frameworks
>
> Rod John
ast
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Justin
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 3:30 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: MVC Frameworks
>
> Rod Johnson (author of Spring and one of the
Maverick, WebWork, etc)
2. Why should _I_ prefer ?
The second question is not meant to make anyone defensive; I'm just
trying to get past
Thanks,
-Justin
-Original Message-
From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 3:30 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing Lis
ake anyone defensive; I'm just
trying to get past
Thanks,
-Justin
-Original Message-
From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 3:30 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: MVC Frameworks
Rod Johnson (author of Spring and one of the clearest
Rod Johnson (author of Spring and one of the clearest thinkers I have
ever read IMHO) has a good discussion of the options in J2EE
Development without EJB in Chapter 13: Web Tier Design.
Jack
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 14:19:47 -0600, Justin Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am curren
20 matches
Mail list logo
