I guess you can not do this.
Because there should be ONLY ONE HTTP response for every HTTP request.
So you can only return a file downlod or a redirect to the client, but not both.
If you want to jump to another page after file download,
may be you can try JavaScript solution in the client side.
Maybe there is a better way than orchestrating directly a low level api.
What do you need exactly?
Why don't you simple use wildcard mapping [1]?
[1] http://struts.apache.org/2.1.8/docs/wildcard-mappings.html
Maurizio Cucchiara
On Dec 18, 2010 2:04 AM, "wusheng zhang" wrote:
> I have some actio
holod wrote:
As I understood, I have to use dojo plugin (additional jar).
Please, tell me, is it possible to avoid usage of dojo plugin?
Seems like my problem can be solved:
if would not send request automatically, when page is loaded, but
only on user mouse click, I would be happy using it w
tring
should get populated in the form.
Regards,
Randy Burgess
Sr. Web Applications Developer
Nuvox Communications
> From: ryan webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:35:34 +0800
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re
t; Randy Burgess
> Sr. Web Applications Developer
> Nuvox Communications
>
>
>
> > From: ryan webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:40:25 +0800
> > To: Struts Users Mailing List
> > Subject: R
; To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Is it possible to make a pop up window using Struts?
>
> Antonio,
>
>> 1) What Struts? Struts 1.2.9 (Netbeans bundle)
>> 2) You can still do it in Javascript. I see.. I just want to know if you do
> it with struts.
>
&
2008/4/16, ryan webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I am having trouble with it..I created a pop up window using javascript
> and
> i cant pass query string on new window.
> when i clicked a I pass a paramId and paramProperty and I cant
> make it appear to new window.
>
> I have an action class that has
Antonio,
>1) What Struts? Struts 1.2.9 (Netbeans bundle)
>2) You can still do it in Javascript. I see.. I just want to know if you do
it with struts.
I am having trouble with it..I created a pop up window using javascript and
i cant pass query string on new window.
when i clicked a I pass a para
2008/4/16, ryan webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is it possible to make a window pop up using struts?
> usually this can be done in Javascript..
1) What Struts?
2) You can still do it in Javascript
Antonio
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
THANK YOU nuwan !!! this is exactly what i was looking for
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/is-it-possible-to-pass-a-parameter--to-an-interceptor-from-the-xml-file--tp15074977p15090339.html
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
hi,
i think whats not possible is
...
< param name="...">${actionclass'sVariable}
...
i.e. getting the variable form action calss and accessing it or evaluating
an expression as the param value.
any ideas how this is possible
cheers,
ravi
nuwan chandrasoma-2 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> yes it is
Hi,
yes it is possible., just implement a setter and getter method for the
parameter you have in the struts.xml file. and it will be available to
you in the intercept method.
eg:-
// in the intercept class..
private String httpPort;
public String getHttpPort() {
return httpPort;
This might help
http://www.vitarara.org/cms/struts_2_cookbook/post_and_redirect
http://www.vitarara.org/cms/struts_2_cookbook/post_and_redirect
Piero Sartini-3 wrote:
>
> I have the following situation:
> a searchfield is on top of a table presenting results. if there is only
> one
> result
Piero Sartini wrote:
I have the following situation:
a searchfield is on top of a table presenting results. if there is only one
result, the user should be redirected without the need of clicking on the
list..
now my problem is how to redirect to an action and passing a parameter from
within
Piero Sartini wrote:
I have the following situation:
a searchfield is on top of a table presenting results. if there is only one
result, the user should be redirected without the need of clicking on the
list..
If you just want them to see the list for X seconds, then the link to be
followed,
Hi,
Thanks I can now unit test my xml validation files but with one problem. My
action class implements ModelDriven so I need to add "model." before all
ognl-expression and remove it again after the tests!
Is there any solutions to that?
Regards
Gunnar
Martin Gilday wrote:
>
> http://wiki.op
http://wiki.opensymphony.com/display/WW/Testing+Validation describes how
to do it for WebWork. The process should be very similar for Struts 2.
Thanks,
Martin.
- Original message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: user@struts.apache.org
Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 12:52:40 +0200
Subject: Is it pos
...or request.isSecure()
Larry
On 3/27/07, Christopher Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam,
Adam Lipscombe wrote:
> From a Struts Action is it possible to tell if SSL is in use?
>
> I tried httpServletRequest.getPathInfo(), getRequestURL() an
>> You gave up just before you found it: you are looking for
ServletRequest.getScheme():
Silly me :-)
Many thanks all...
Adam
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam,
Adam Lipscombe wrote:
From a Struts Action is it possible to tell if SSL is in us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam,
Adam Lipscombe wrote:
> From a Struts Action is it possible to tell if SSL is in use?
>
> I tried httpServletRequest.getPathInfo(), getRequestURL() and
> getAuthType(), but none of these seem to return anything that indicates
> if the request s
Hi
You can use java SSL with your application
And Check by request if SSL in Use
But you should import in your files
If it is a wrong Idea , Please Drop it
Regards
Muralidharan.C
Senior Software Engineer
Catalytic Software, Ltd
Hyderabad. India
-Original Message-
From: Adam Lips
--- Adam Lipscombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I tried httpServletRequest.getPathInfo(),
> getRequestURL() and getAuthType(), but none of these
> seem to return anything that indicates if the
request
> started with "http:" or "https:".
>
> Any ideas if this is possible? How?
getScheme()
d.
Take the static content out of .jar, doesn't help the performance?
I know that taking the template directory out of jar helps a lot at
performance when rendering ui.
Doesn't it heppen the same with static content?
best,
Felipe
Musachy Barroso wrote:
>
> I don't think so, if you set it to fals
mraible raibledesigns.com> writes:
> I'm using *.html as my default extension, which causes a whole host of issues
> with Dojo. Regardless, I want to fight through it and see if I can come up
> with a solution.
Hi Matt,
I'm not sure about your specific FilterDispatcher question, but we also use
Is there a FAQ for S2 somewhere?
musachy
On 2/27/07, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoting the doc: "
Common static content that is needed by the framework (JavaScript and CSS
files, etc.) is served automatically by the FilterDispatcher filter. Any
request starting with "/struts/
Quoting the doc: "
Common static content that is needed by the framework (JavaScript and CSS
files, etc.) is served automatically by the FilterDispatcher filter. Any
request starting with "/struts/" denotes that static content is required,
and then mapping the value after "/struts/" to common pac
OK thanks.
This was my original approach, except now I am having trouble with the bean:write + formatKey
approach - please see my other post entitled "formatting money values with bean:write".
So summarise:
It seems that whenever the formatKey specification results in a lookup of a format Stri
Adam Lipscombe wrote:
Folks
I need to internationalize an app - returning Locale specific formats
for currency and date.
One way to do that is to add getLocalised() and
setLocalised() to the formbeans for each affected
property. These methods will then apply whatever formatting is needed.
I am interested too.
__
Senior Programmer Analyst, Tax Distributed Systems Development
Tax & Compliance Development, ADP IT
Phone: (909) 592-6411 Ext. 3863
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Struts2 Fan [mailto:[EMAIL P
On 1/30/07, Struts2 Fan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I just want to know if it is possible to join Struts2 Team.
If (possible) {
how();
}else if( !possible){
willItBePossible();
}
These should be helpful:
http://struts.apache.org/helping.html
http://apache.org/foundation/how-it-wo
I use the ServletContext when the Servlet loads to get files relatively like
this: context.getResourceAsStream("/WEB-INF/MyPersonalXMLFile.xml")
Shawn
-Original Message-
From: Shailesh Barde [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 10:21 PM
To: user@struts.apache.org
Su
ECTED]>
To: "Struts Users Mailing List"
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 11:54 PM
Subject: RE: Is it Possible!
try using (className.class).getResource("NameOfResourceInFolder");
it returns a URL
get path from String path = URLName.getPath();
and then,
add your relative path
OTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 11:49 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Is it Possible!
I believe if you try to access from main it is not possible to access the
file without giving the absolute path.
However, if you try to access it fro
I believe if you try to access from main it is not possible to access the
file without giving the absolute path.
However, if you try to access it from a servlet you can use
getServletContext().getRealPath(
"/WEB-INF/classes/myMessegeResources.properties").
Regards,
Basudeb Acharya
Tata Consul
try using (className.class).getResource("NameOfResourceInFolder");
it returns a URL
get path from String path = URLName.getPath();
and then,
add your relative path to the path returned
-Original Message-
From: Shailesh Barde [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 9:5
hi,
sorry. forgot to mention that you would have to take path.lastIndexOf("/")
and then add your relative path
-Original Message-
From: Vishal Dalal
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 10:17 AM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Subject: RE: Is it Possible!
try us
Do you have a URL for this Dice reference? That is interesting.
Thanks.
Jack
On Apr 4, 2005 9:45 AM, NetSQL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Benedict, Paul C wrote:
>
> It is very difficult to divorce that little phrase from the general
> > implication that we should all move away from Struts in
Benedict, Paul C wrote:
It is very difficult to divorce that little phrase from the general
implication that we should all move away from Struts in new projects. I do
not think it is true.
+1.
One can look at Dice new jobs on new projects and see what % is for
Struts and what % is JSF. Go look
Rick Reumann wrote:
For the record, so others don't think I'm a die-hard Struts or JSF
person, the prediction Jack made was in reference to a question by Dave:
"Anyway, how come no one is saying that the future is Struts 1.3 or
1.4? Why all the hoopla about the future IS JSF?"
I didn't ask that,
lay this to rest now. :) I am putting down my pen. Finito.
-Original Message-
From: Rick Reumann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 11:04 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: [OT] Re: Is It Possible to Code Using Struts and JSF at the Same
Time?
Dakota Jack wrote
Dakota Jack wrote the following on 4/1/2005 8:03 PM:
On Apr 1, 2005 12:01 PM, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Because you get yelled at when you say that and some people cannot
take being yelled at. Expect Craig, Ted, or someone to say the
standard thing soon on this tread. I know I am do
The Struts tags still scratch my itch and I have applied a few changes in
the past year (including some re-factoring).
http://www.niallp.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/strutsversion126.html
Having said that, my open source time is limited so I'm not promising masses
of changes, but I don't yet see them
Craig McClanahan wrote:
On Apr 2, 2005 8:38 AM, Erik Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was playing a bit of devil's advocate when I wrote "I have no interest
in JSF". It probably sounded harsh.
The truth is, I want both Struts and JSF in my toolbox. I don't want one
to supplant the other.
I ha
That is probably, as Craig said, because the parallel behavior is with
Actions, not ActionForms. Struts is not a page-centric framework, and
it does not react well to being treated as such.
Jack
On Apr 3, 2005 3:49 PM, Mark Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Best practices for separating model
> Best practices for separating model tier objects from your view tier
> objects, and keeping them independent of view tier APIs, are pretty
> much the same with JSF as they are with Struts. In other words, you
> won't want your view tier managed beans (typically in request scope)
> to be exposed
On Apr 3, 2005 2:34 AM, Mark Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Craig
>
> This is a deviation from the topic slightly, but is related to struts and
> jsf.
>
> With struts there's the clear idea of having all you view tier beans
> (actionforms) that have nothing to do with the model, and so on.
>
Craig
This is a deviation from the topic slightly, but is related to struts and jsf.
With struts there's the clear idea of having all you view tier beans
(actionforms) that have nothing to do with the model, and so on.
With JSF the conversions are taken care of, would persisting backing
beans b
On Apr 2, 2005 8:38 AM, Erik Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was playing a bit of devil's advocate when I wrote "I have no interest
> in JSF". It probably sounded harsh.
>
> The truth is, I want both Struts and JSF in my toolbox. I don't want one
> to supplant the other.
>
> I have a couple
I was playing a bit of devil's advocate when I wrote "I have no interest
in JSF". It probably sounded harsh.
The truth is, I want both Struts and JSF in my toolbox. I don't want one
to supplant the other.
I have a couple of JSF questions.
1) I do a lot of Swing work with some HTTP-based service
On Apr 2, 2005 6:33 AM, Mark Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
.
> If you see how the form validation and type conversion happens in JSF
> I cant really see how anyone can argue that this isn't progress.
This is like arguing that a semi-truck is an improvement over the
automobile because it ha
I usually develop with struts, and have been constantly evaluating JSF
to see when the time in right to do everything with JSF. As someone
who's pretty cynical about new this and that, the ever changing "world
according to sun" and so on, I like JSF. As a means of creating
complex forms its obvious
We would do things your way, and things would be just great then,
Brian, but you forgot to tell us how we should do things. So we will
all have to muddle by in the ways we can manage, and, additionally,
have to suffer your approbation because you have abandoned us just
when you can see we most nee
Dakota Jack wrote:
I have no problem with the diversity. I think that Sun is making an
error following NET rather than leading the way with a truly new
web-MVC product. They should hire Rod Johnson and whomever he wants
to work with and let him go to town doing something that will stand
the test
On Apr 1, 2005 12:01 PM, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because you get yelled at when you say that and some people cannot
> take being yelled at. Expect Craig, Ted, or someone to say the
> standard thing soon on this tread. I know I am doing my part. LOL
> ///;-)
>
> Jack
You saw
On Apr 1, 2005 3:07 PM, Rick Reumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank W. Zammetti wrote the following on 4/1/2005 3:48 PM:
I think it's quite low to state that: '(Craig has) taken
> every opportunity to tell everyone that JSF is in fact "the future."'
> this is an untrue statement - I think he's
Rick Reumann wrote:
And Frank, you and plenty of others, constantly let us now how JSF is
horrible.
Actually, I defy you to find a reference where I have flat-out bashed
JSF. I have expressed concerns, and I have, I'm sure, said I'm not so
certain some of the basic concepts behind it are good
Frank W. Zammetti wrote the following on 4/1/2005 3:48 PM:
I think there is little question that you have taken every opportunity
to tell everyone that JSF is in fact "the future". There is no doubt in
my mind that you actually believe that.
And Frank, you and plenty of others, constantly let
On Apr 1, 2005 2:37 PM, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dakota Jack wrote:
> > That does not mean it is horrible, of course, but it is about as new
> > as "Lost in Space" is new on TV. Remember that robot that always went
> > "Crisis! Crisis!"? LOL
>
> It was "Danger! Danger!",
Craig McClanahan wrote:
There's been lots of comments about what "everyone is saying" (here,
about JSF, but in general about any technology). To make good
decisions, however, it is useful to divide "everyone" into several
categories:
I have no problem with the categories you enumerate. And if I'm
Dakota Jack wrote:
That does not mean it is horrible, of course, but it is about as new
as "Lost in Space" is new on TV. Remember that robot that always went
"Crisis! Crisis!"? LOL
It was "Danger! Danger!", which applies just about as well :)
Anyway, I think a lot of the hype and a lot of the r
Woodchuck wrote:
i think what is irking a lot of people in the community is the *way* in
which JSF is being marketed. oooh, i would even go so far as to say
that the evangelism is Microsoft-esque, but in a subtler way.
I think that is exactly the crux of it.
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief
I think that Craig came up with Template Method pattern and that
necessitated CoR, if I am not mistaken.
Hopefully CorR, which is old as the hills, is merely a temporary
solution to the difficulties caused by the use of the Template Method
pattern and hopefully this is just so in the extensible re
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
It strikes me as nothing more than a bunch of marketing-speak
in place of substantive discussion.
I agree.
I also respect and admire Craig and know that he has indirectly put
money in my pocket.
But... he has an itch for JSF and he will go that way, and it's a loss
for
don't you just love Friday discussions!!?? :D
i think it's normal and healthy to be somewhat skeptical, and it is
natural for the knee-jerk response to something that is being force-fed
to them to be rejection. heck, even babies may not right away eat the
apple sauce you try to stuff in them!
i
I think that JSF has been around long enough from inception (2001) to
now (2005) to tell whether or not it is the Cats Meow. It isn't.
That does not mean it is horrible, of course, but it is about as new
as "Lost in Space" is new on TV. Remember that robot that always went
"Crisis! Crisis!"? L
On Apr 1, 2005 12:48 PM, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Craig McClanahan wrote:
> > Feel free to continue using Struts, however, if that floats *your* boat.
>
> It's not really as simple as that though, is it Craig?
>
Sure it is. People will continue to use Struts no matter what
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
> Craig McClanahan wrote:
>
>> Feel free to continue using Struts, however, if that floats *your* boat.
>
>
> It's not really as simple as that though, is it Craig?
>
> You have a great deal of sway, your opinion carries a lot of weight.
> You have earned that without ques
The fact is that some people say JSF is great and some say it sucks.
Some of those without much love for it are people who know what they
are talking about. I don't know anyone without a stake and who has
huge standing in the community that talks up JSF. If there is, then
that would be good to k
On Apr 1, 2005 12:23 PM, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 1, 2005 11:20 AM, Erik Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Struts 1.x has been in development for very close to five years (1.0
> was initially released just about four years ago). We've all learned
> a few things, in th
Craig McClanahan wrote:
Feel free to continue using Struts, however, if that floats *your* boat.
It's not really as simple as that though, is it Craig?
You have a great deal of sway, your opinion carries a lot of weight.
You have earned that without question. So by you making proclamations,
even
Benedict, Paul C wrote:
To Jack's point, doing a *new* application in both Struts and JSF seems like
a ludicrous design. So if you are going to develop a new application and
favor JSF UI tags in it, doesn't that imply a goal to developing in pure
JSF?
Well... yep, it seems to.
I guess all was r
K, Dave, K
On Apr 1, 2005 12:11 PM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dakota Jack wrote:
>
> >No, Dave, the topic started out to be about Struts and JSF. The two
> >solutions, JSF and Struts, even if Craig got JSF into the Struts camp
> >with Shale, are competely antithetical.
> >
> The p
ult time accepting that the future is JSF. Despite
it's
acceptance as a standard, I don't feel any compelling reason to ever
use JSF
over Struts unless JSF becomes a huge marketing success.
What should a Struts developer make out of JSF?
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Craig McC
10 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Is It Possible to Code Using Struts and JSF at the Same Time?
Benedict, Paul C wrote:
>Unless I am wrong (I may be!), I think the implicit point is not to use
>Struts for future projects. Since JSF provides backing beans, validation,
>heav
On Apr 1, 2005 11:20 AM, Erik Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree. I thought, Craig, that you until recently were interested in
> Struts and JSF coexisting, meaning that both would grow, even if you
> were no longer the active leader of Struts.
There is an integration library that lets you
Dakota Jack wrote:
No, Dave, the topic started out to be about Struts and JSF. The two
solutions, JSF and Struts, even if Craig got JSF into the Struts camp
with Shale, are competely antithetical.
The post I responded to was specifically about how the struts HTML tags
were legacy and hadn't gotte
Benedict, Paul C wrote:
Unless I am wrong (I may be!), I think the implicit point is not to use
Struts for future projects. Since JSF provides backing beans, validation,
heavy user interface controls (all Struts equivalents), I can see why
someone would promote JSF over Struts.
Ooo, hrm. Al
future is Struts 1.3 or 1.4? Why
> all the hoopla about the future IS JSF?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Newton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 2:31 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Is It Possible to Code Using Struts and JSF at the S
On Apr 1, 2005 11:08 AM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Benedict, Paul C wrote:
>
> >Thank you for the response and advice. I will take this into consideration,
> >but I have a difficult time accepting that the future is JSF. Despite it's
> >acceptance as a standard, I don't feel any com
No, Dave, the topic started out to be about Struts and JSF. The two
solutions, JSF and Struts, even if Craig got JSF into the Struts camp
with Shale, are competely antithetical. Read the MASTER HISSELF, Rod
Johnson, in J2EE Development without EJB on Struts and JSF, Shale, or
whatever. I have no
Who he is, Dave, is someone paid by the people bringing you JSF. Doh!
I think I will just have to do my own evaluation all by myself, and
then I can say "The best thing about it is that I did it myself".
Like they said about me in the 3rd grade: he always does a little more
than asked. ///;-)
I agree with this. The html tags are boss.
On Apr 1, 2005 6:45 AM, NetSQL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Craig McClanahan wrote:
>
> >
> > I would caution new projects, however, to *not* use the Struts HTML
> > tags. That part of Struts has received fairly little developer
> > attention, and shou
Sure you can. It is just the same as coding both .NET and Sruts.
Nuts, but you can do it.
Jack
On Mar 30, 2005 7:30 AM, Caroline Jen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am working on a big J2EE project. The project is at
> its initial stage. The leaders of the project have not
> quite made up their
Original Message-
From: Dave Newton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 2:31 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Is It Possible to Code Using Struts and JSF at the Same Time?
Erik Weber wrote:
> I agree. I thought, Craig, that you until recently were interest
Erik Weber wrote:
I agree. I thought, Craig, that you until recently were interested in
Struts and JSF coexisting, meaning that both would grow, even if you
were no longer the active leader of Struts.
I don't think anybody said anything about not using Struts; we were
discussing the Struts tags,
t should a Struts developer make out of JSF?
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 1:50 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Is It Possible to Code Using Struts and JSF at the Same Time?
On Apr 1, 2005 8:23 AM, Bene
Benedict, Paul C wrote:
Thank you for the response and advice. I will take this into consideration,
but I have a difficult time accepting that the future is JSF. Despite it's
acceptance as a standard, I don't feel any compelling reason to ever use JSF
over Struts unless JSF becomes a huge marketing
ess.
What should a Struts developer make out of JSF?
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 1:50 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Is It Possible to Code Using Struts and JSF at the Same Time?
On Apr 1, 20
On Apr 1, 2005 8:23 AM, Benedict, Paul C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So is Craig's advice to abandon Struts tags even in a Struts app? Write out
> HTML elements yourself and get the values with expressions?
No. My advice is to plan on using JSF components for the UI part.
That can be an orthog
Ich bin bis 01.05.2005 nicht zu erreichen. In dringenden Fällen kontaktieren
Sie bitte:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Benedict, Paul C wrote:
So is Craig's advice to abandon Struts tags even in a Struts app? Write out
HTML elements yourself and get the values with expressions?
Dunno. Craig?
I still use the html tags because they know about the app resources, but
I sometimes struggle a bit when I need to extend
Ich bin bis 01.05.2005 nicht zu erreichen. In dringenden Fällen kontaktieren
Sie bitte:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So is Craig's advice to abandon Struts tags even in a Struts app? Write out
HTML elements yourself and get the values with expressions?
-Original Message-
From: Dave Newton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 11:20 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re:
NetSQL wrote:
Craig McClanahan wrote:
I would caution new projects, however, to *not* use the Struts HTML
tags. That part of Struts has received fairly little developer
attention, and should be considered legacy at this point.
I would disagree. JSTL replaced some tag, but HTML tag is IMO best
pr
Craig McClanahan wrote:
I would caution new projects, however, to *not* use the Struts HTML
tags. That part of Struts has received fairly little developer
attention, and should be considered legacy at this point.
I would disagree. JSTL replaced some tag, but HTML tag is IMO best
practice and pro
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 07:30:41 -0800 (PST), Caroline Jen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am working on a big J2EE project. The project is at
> its initial stage. The leaders of the project have not
> quite made up their mind on whether we are going to
> use the Struts framework or JSF. But, all member
Hi,
Its all depend on your project's domain.
But I can tell you boldly that you can use Struts and JSP together without
worried your project size.
So, at present if you want to start coding you can start design your JSP
pages, and later on add struts tags.
Regards,
Himanshu Shah
-Original
Hi,
Its all depend on your project's domain.
But I can tell you boldly that you can use Struts and JSP together without
worried your project size.
So, at present if you want to start coding you can start design your JSP
pages, and later on add struts tags.
Regards,
Himanshu Shah
-Original
Subject: Re: Is it possible to harvest the form values and populate an
I think some scripting would be in order...
If I understand correctly... when the button on your parent form is clicked,
a modal dialog is opened and the URL you tell that dialog to display is
actually an Action that does some
Could the button on your parent submit the form to the backend with a new
popup windows defined as the "target" attribute (of the html form)? That way
your main form values are sent to the backend, but the results (i.e. your
wizard) is shown in the popup window.
Paul
> -Original Message-
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
