purpose.
Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
03/07/2007 02:20 PM
Please respond to
"Struts Users Mailing List"
To
Struts Users Mailing List
cc
Subject
Re: [OT] Re: Interceptor + putting information on the request
--- Matt Filion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Matt Filion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Though the different situation seems like
"overkill".
I don't make my local vars 'final' either, but I know
enough people that do.
> How about expecting a programmer to look at the code
> becore they modify it? :)
Works great in theory ;)
But seriou
such purpose.
Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
03/07/2007 02:01 PM
Please respond to
"Struts Users Mailing List"
To
Struts Users Mailing List
cc
Subject
Re: [OT] Re: Interceptor
--- Matt Filion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So for me it should be neither final or even a
member
> variable. Just a referance within the scope of the
> executed method.
>
> It creates an unatural relationship that could
> potential complicate the frameworks control of the
> ActionContext.
IIR
Dave,
This is all symantics I guess, but I dont mind a good "discussion" :)
To me with the way the relationship is between the 2 objects,
ActionContext is not a PART of the Interceptor, it is something the
Interceptor uses. So for me it should be neither final or even a member
variable. Just a
5 matches
Mail list logo
