Dave, I completely agree, I guess I'm just much more of an optomist about my peers :)
Matt Filion CSC - GTS --> Raytheon - ISF (818) 468-6271 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such purpose. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/07/2007 02:20 PM Please respond to "Struts Users Mailing List" <user@struts.apache.org> To Struts Users Mailing List <user@struts.apache.org> cc Subject Re: [OT] Re: Interceptor + putting information on the request --- Matt Filion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Though the different situation seems like "overkill". I don't make my local vars 'final' either, but I know enough people that do. > How about expecting a programmer to look at the code > becore they modify it? :) Works great in theory ;) But seriously, making local vars 'final' is to express *intent* whether or not the code was looked at--sort of a "If you *really* want to that, fine, but you must explicitly remove the protections I have set in place." d. ____________________________________________________________________________________ It's here! Your new message! Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
