Re: Annotation support for interceptor-ref

2007-03-29 Thread Dave Newton
--- Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right now I'm not even picking up any properties > files :/ Just a quick followup on this, because it's confusing me... it's picking up the properties now, but I don't know what was wrong before, if I deployed funkily, or what. Hopefully it'll break aga

Re: Annotation support for interceptor-ref

2007-03-29 Thread Dave Newton
--- Chris Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've also gone on to discover that you can't > mix-n-match either. If you use the @Result > annotation and an (with no 's) it > blows up big time. Wait, what? You mean mix configuring a single Action with both annotations *and* an XML config? That

Re: Annotation support for interceptor-ref

2007-03-29 Thread Chris Pratt
Sorry, I didn't find that discussion when I did my search, any chance you know where it is. I've also gone on to discover that you can't mix-n-match either. If you use the @Result annotation and an (with no 's) it blows up big time. Which was a bit surprising to me, seems like this will be nec

Re: Annotation support for interceptor-ref

2007-03-29 Thread Dave Newton
--- Chris Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to learn the Zero Configuration > Annotations by converting the > mailreader2 to be Annotation based. Unfortunately > the first page I attempted uses an > tag in the action mapping. Is there an > equivalent Annotation? Not yet, as discuss

Annotation support for interceptor-ref

2007-03-29 Thread Chris Pratt
I'm trying to learn the Zero Configuration Annotations by converting the mailreader2 to be Annotation based. Unfortunately the first page I attempted uses an tag in the action mapping. Is there an equivalent Annotation? (*Chris*)