Re: implementing javax.servlet.Filter w/Struts

2006-06-01 Thread Konstantin Priblouda
--- CrackheadMillionaire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also, can anyone explain why my filter is bypassed > if the mapping is for *.jsp, but gets hit for *.do? > > Any advice is greatly appreciated. I think that nobody would say you why this happens, unless you post relevant code from yo

Re: Action 2.0 xdoclet?

2006-05-24 Thread Konstantin Priblouda
--- Emmanouil Batsis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Holla, > > Is an xdoclet plugin or hack available for Struts > Action 2? I finished one for webwork / xwork ( which is SAF 2 ;) ) for xdoclet 2 http://xdoclet.codehaus.org/Xwork+plugin Though it is available as snapshot for now. Feedback

Re: OT: Re: friday ha ha

2006-04-19 Thread Konstantin Priblouda
--- Vinny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Like how xdoclet should die? Heh, I'm still using > xdoclet 1.x > (will never go to xdoclet2 ) until an @Annotations > based replacement > shows itself It's nice to hear that you value my work at XD1 and are happy with it. There is nothing wrong with exis

Re: friday ha ha

2006-04-18 Thread Konstantin Priblouda
> Clearly you have no idea what you are talking about. > (Struts now has a marketing capability? ha ha) You are sureley permanently employed, aren't you? There is no "struts marketing organisation" but nevertheless struts has a good visibility and is asked as a skill / tool to start new project

Re: friday ha ha

2006-04-18 Thread Konstantin Priblouda
--- Adam Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would hardly call that "hardly anything > substantive". A large amount > of boring grunt work would be a better description - > including the > difficulty of having all the code on the target > projects checked in for > refactoring, making sure n

Re: The Mytical stagnation

2006-03-30 Thread Konstantin Priblouda
--- Jonathan Revusky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since I don't see that, I have to conclude that most > people don't grok > what is going on, or at least the full implications. > If one does > understand the full implications, one ought to be > quite wary about > continuing to invest in buil