--- Adam Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would hardly call that "hardly anything > substantive". A large amount > of boring grunt work would be a better description - > including the > difficulty of having all the code on the target > projects checked in for > refactoring, making sure no developers on the team > are in mid-iteration. Even java developers should know about sed and find :) If not, friendly system administrator could write small script in about 10 minutes ( do not forget to give him a beer ) As for "mid iteration" - it's just a question of project organisation. > Also I would expect there to be a large amount of > head scratching by the > struts committers every time they come across > something that will break > when going from struts 1 to 2 - assuming they are > thinking to some > degree about backwards compatibility. I affraid there is nothing bout backward compatibility. Struts 1.x is stuck in 2001, and webwork was actively developed over the time. And I hope that there will be no effort to achieve this compatibility. ( or I'll fork webwork myself off latest state ) Struts 1.x shall be allowed to die and rest in peace. regards, ----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]---------------- Still using XDoclet 1.x? XDoclet 2 is released and of production quality. check it out: http://xdoclet.codehaus.org __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
