We would do things your way, and things would be just great then,
Brian, but you forgot to tell us how we should do things. So we will
all have to muddle by in the ways we can manage, and, additionally,
have to suffer your approbation because you have abandoned us just
when you can see we most nee
If I understood correctly ... try this:
Some Heading(note)
Regards
On Apr 1, 2005 8:16 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, I would like a little more help please as I am not very good at CSS.
> But, I have a cell that I do not control the
> style. THe only issue is I need to
Evening all,
I just completed an article and sample webapp to go along with it about
using the Ajax concept (XMLHttpRequest) with Struts. I've posted a link
off the Wiki front page and started a new Wiki page that I hope others
will expand upon over time. The idea is to share interesting ways
Dakota Jack wrote:
I have no problem with the diversity. I think that Sun is making an
error following NET rather than leading the way with a truly new
web-MVC product. They should hire Rod Johnson and whomever he wants
to work with and let him go to town doing something that will stand
the test
On Apr 1, 2005 12:01 PM, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because you get yelled at when you say that and some people cannot
> take being yelled at. Expect Craig, Ted, or someone to say the
> standard thing soon on this tread. I know I am doing my part. LOL
> ///;-)
>
> Jack
You saw
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian McGovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I am switching from using struts-logic tags to jstl and have
> a really basic question.
>
> An object stored in Application Scope has a method called
> getKeyValues() that returns an array list of beans, each
>
On Apr 1, 2005 3:07 PM, Rick Reumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank W. Zammetti wrote the following on 4/1/2005 3:48 PM:
I think it's quite low to state that: '(Craig has) taken
> every opportunity to tell everyone that JSF is in fact "the future."'
> this is an untrue statement - I think he's
Rick Reumann wrote:
And Frank, you and plenty of others, constantly let us now how JSF is
horrible.
Actually, I defy you to find a reference where I have flat-out bashed
JSF. I have expressed concerns, and I have, I'm sure, said I'm not so
certain some of the basic concepts behind it are good
I am trying to get a message based on a key (label.owner), and an interger I
give (1, 2, 3 etc...)
So, I am trying to use this but it doesn't work:
label.owner.<%ownerNumber%>
Any ideas how to get a dynamic key value liek this?
--
Thanks...
Mick Knutson
Systems Developer
Business
OK, I would like a little more help please as I am not very good at CSS.
But, I have a cell that I do not control the style.
THe only issue is I need to add a bit of text that should look like this:
Some Heading (note)
Now the Heading gets set just fine with the td.style_external, but when I
c
Frank W. Zammetti wrote the following on 4/1/2005 3:48 PM:
I think there is little question that you have taken every opportunity
to tell everyone that JSF is in fact "the future". There is no doubt in
my mind that you actually believe that.
And Frank, you and plenty of others, constantly let
Anyone have some leads on code converting between documents, e.g. PDF
to DOC, GIF to JPEG, etc.? Thanks!
Jack
--
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
~Dakota Jack~
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Craig McClanahan wrote:
On Apr 1, 2005 2:11 PM, Duong BaTien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Craig:
Well, this is Friday so we can take it easy on the debate between Struts
and Jsf. This is about Struts-Shale, Jsf and Tiles.
First, thank you for your contributions in CoR commons-chain and Shale
On Apr 1, 2005 2:37 PM, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dakota Jack wrote:
> > That does not mean it is horrible, of course, but it is about as new
> > as "Lost in Space" is new on TV. Remember that robot that always went
> > "Crisis! Crisis!"? LOL
>
> It was "Danger! Danger!",
Craig McClanahan wrote:
There's been lots of comments about what "everyone is saying" (here,
about JSF, but in general about any technology). To make good
decisions, however, it is useful to divide "everyone" into several
categories:
I have no problem with the categories you enumerate. And if I'm
Dakota Jack wrote:
That does not mean it is horrible, of course, but it is about as new
as "Lost in Space" is new on TV. Remember that robot that always went
"Crisis! Crisis!"? LOL
It was "Danger! Danger!", which applies just about as well :)
Anyway, I think a lot of the hype and a lot of the r
Woodchuck wrote:
i think what is irking a lot of people in the community is the *way* in
which JSF is being marketed. oooh, i would even go so far as to say
that the evangelism is Microsoft-esque, but in a subtler way.
I think that is exactly the crux of it.
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief
On Apr 1, 2005 2:11 PM, Duong BaTien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Craig:
>
> Well, this is Friday so we can take it easy on the debate between Struts
> and Jsf. This is about Struts-Shale, Jsf and Tiles.
>
> First, thank you for your contributions in CoR commons-chain and Shale.
> I had som
I think that Craig came up with Template Method pattern and that
necessitated CoR, if I am not mistaken.
Hopefully CorR, which is old as the hills, is merely a temporary
solution to the difficulties caused by the use of the Template Method
pattern and hopefully this is just so in the extensible re
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
It strikes me as nothing more than a bunch of marketing-speak
in place of substantive discussion.
I agree.
I also respect and admire Craig and know that he has indirectly put
money in my pocket.
But... he has an itch for JSF and he will go that way, and it's a loss
for
I have a strange problem with PropertyMessageResourcesFactory not being
found when I run JspC from Ant. This is against tomcat5 (5.0.30-6jpp)
from the JPackage project, on RedHat EL 3.0, with IBM's 1.4.2 JDK (x86).
Two projects, both with very similar build files - one works fine
against Tomcat5,
Hello Craig:
Well, this is Friday so we can take it easy on the debate between Struts
and Jsf. This is about Struts-Shale, Jsf and Tiles.
First, thank you for your contributions in CoR commons-chain and Shale.
I had some time to re-visit shale and have successfully implemented
shale as a servle
don't you just love Friday discussions!!?? :D
i think it's normal and healthy to be somewhat skeptical, and it is
natural for the knee-jerk response to something that is being force-fed
to them to be rejection. heck, even babies may not right away eat the
apple sauce you try to stuff in them!
i
I am having an issue with two form fields not validating properly.
Basically, I have a form that is being used to add documents to a
repository...
The form allows the user to enter information about the document and upload
the document to the repository.
Here is the form html:
<%@ taglib uri="/
I think that JSF has been around long enough from inception (2001) to
now (2005) to tell whether or not it is the Cats Meow. It isn't.
That does not mean it is horrible, of course, but it is about as new
as "Lost in Space" is new on TV. Remember that robot that always went
"Crisis! Crisis!"? L
On Apr 1, 2005 12:48 PM, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Craig McClanahan wrote:
> > Feel free to continue using Struts, however, if that floats *your* boat.
>
> It's not really as simple as that though, is it Craig?
>
Sure it is. People will continue to use Struts no matter what
Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
> Craig McClanahan wrote:
>
>> Feel free to continue using Struts, however, if that floats *your* boat.
>
>
> It's not really as simple as that though, is it Craig?
>
> You have a great deal of sway, your opinion carries a lot of weight.
> You have earned that without ques
The fact is that some people say JSF is great and some say it sucks.
Some of those without much love for it are people who know what they
are talking about. I don't know anyone without a stake and who has
huge standing in the community that talks up JSF. If there is, then
that would be good to k
I am switching from using struts-logic tags to jstl and have a really basic
question.
An object stored in Application Scope has a method called getKeyValues() that
returns an array list of beans, each having a getKey and getValue method.
logic tag works.
">
jstl doesn't
"
On Apr 1, 2005 12:23 PM, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 1, 2005 11:20 AM, Erik Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Struts 1.x has been in development for very close to five years (1.0
> was initially released just about four years ago). We've all learned
> a few things, in th
Craig McClanahan wrote:
Feel free to continue using Struts, however, if that floats *your* boat.
It's not really as simple as that though, is it Craig?
You have a great deal of sway, your opinion carries a lot of weight.
You have earned that without question. So by you making proclamations,
even
Benedict, Paul C wrote:
To Jack's point, doing a *new* application in both Struts and JSF seems like
a ludicrous design. So if you are going to develop a new application and
favor JSF UI tags in it, doesn't that imply a goal to developing in pure
JSF?
Well... yep, it seems to.
I guess all was r
Thank you,
I have been trying to work with the ActionForm for this and it is not easy to
configure.
I wasn't sure if I was sleeping today, or if falling back to
request.getParameter is sometimes the best way to go.
Sincerely
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:[EM
K, Dave, K
On Apr 1, 2005 12:11 PM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dakota Jack wrote:
>
> >No, Dave, the topic started out to be about Struts and JSF. The two
> >solutions, JSF and Struts, even if Craig got JSF into the Struts camp
> >with Shale, are competely antithetical.
> >
> The p
Hi,
If you really don't need to validate but just to store a list of objects in
the db, i'd suggest to forget about action forms and work with
request.getParameter. You can put the logic into the name of the parameter
and/or the value.
Example:
List of properties 1..10,
In the action which is
Hi,
If you really don't need to validate but just to store a list of objects in
the db, i'd suggest to forget about action forms and work with
request.getParameter. You can put the logic into the name of the parameter
and/or the value.
Example:
List of properties 1..10,
In the action which is
Now, I don't want to get off on a rant here,
but...
It is very disconcerting to me to see all this talk of JSF being "the
future". It strikes me as nothing more than a bunch of marketing-speak
in place of substantive discussion.
Note that ASP.Net, which is conceptually very similar to JSF in
Dave,
>>Ooo, hrm. All he really said was that the HTML tags are legacy;
obviously Struts development marches on.
To Jack's point, doing a *new* application in both Struts and JSF seems like
a ludicrous design. So if you are going to develop a new application and
favor JSF UI tags in it, doesn't
On Apr 1, 2005 11:20 AM, Erik Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree. I thought, Craig, that you until recently were interested in
> Struts and JSF coexisting, meaning that both would grow, even if you
> were no longer the active leader of Struts.
There is an integration library that lets you
Dakota Jack wrote:
No, Dave, the topic started out to be about Struts and JSF. The two
solutions, JSF and Struts, even if Craig got JSF into the Struts camp
with Shale, are competely antithetical.
The post I responded to was specifically about how the struts HTML tags
were legacy and hadn't gotte
Benedict, Paul C wrote:
Unless I am wrong (I may be!), I think the implicit point is not to use
Struts for future projects. Since JSF provides backing beans, validation,
heavy user interface controls (all Struts equivalents), I can see why
someone would promote JSF over Struts.
Ooo, hrm. Al
Because you get yelled at when you say that and some people cannot
take being yelled at. Expect Craig, Ted, or someone to say the
standard thing soon on this tread. I know I am doing my part. LOL
///;-)
Jack
On Apr 1, 2005 11:45 AM, Benedict, Paul C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave,
>
> Unl
On Apr 1, 2005 11:08 AM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Benedict, Paul C wrote:
>
> >Thank you for the response and advice. I will take this into consideration,
> >but I have a difficult time accepting that the future is JSF. Despite it's
> >acceptance as a standard, I don't feel any com
No, Dave, the topic started out to be about Struts and JSF. The two
solutions, JSF and Struts, even if Craig got JSF into the Struts camp
with Shale, are competely antithetical. Read the MASTER HISSELF, Rod
Johnson, in J2EE Development without EJB on Struts and JSF, Shale, or
whatever. I have no
Who he is, Dave, is someone paid by the people bringing you JSF. Doh!
I think I will just have to do my own evaluation all by myself, and
then I can say "The best thing about it is that I did it myself".
Like they said about me in the 3rd grade: he always does a little more
than asked. ///;-)
I agree with this. The html tags are boss.
On Apr 1, 2005 6:45 AM, NetSQL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Craig McClanahan wrote:
>
> >
> > I would caution new projects, however, to *not* use the Struts HTML
> > tags. That part of Struts has received fairly little developer
> > attention, and shou
Sure you can. It is just the same as coding both .NET and Sruts.
Nuts, but you can do it.
Jack
On Mar 30, 2005 7:30 AM, Caroline Jen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am working on a big J2EE project. The project is at
> its initial stage. The leaders of the project have not
> quite made up their
Dave,
Unless I am wrong (I may be!), I think the implicit point is not to use
Struts for future projects. Since JSF provides backing beans, validation,
heavy user interface controls (all Struts equivalents), I can see why
someone would promote JSF over Struts.
But why? If the only reason is
Erik Weber wrote:
I agree. I thought, Craig, that you until recently were interested in
Struts and JSF coexisting, meaning that both would grow, even if you
were no longer the active leader of Struts.
I don't think anybody said anything about not using Struts; we were
discussing the Struts tags,
I agree. I thought, Craig, that you until recently were interested in
Struts and JSF coexisting, meaning that both would grow, even if you
were no longer the active leader of Struts.
As a developer, I have no interest in JSF, but am interested in Struts 1.3.
Erik
Benedict, Paul C wrote:
Craig,
T
Benedict, Paul C wrote:
Thank you for the response and advice. I will take this into consideration,
but I have a difficult time accepting that the future is JSF. Despite it's
acceptance as a standard, I don't feel any compelling reason to ever use JSF
over Struts unless JSF becomes a huge marketing
Craig,
Thank you for the response and advice. I will take this into consideration,
but I have a difficult time accepting that the future is JSF. Despite it's
acceptance as a standard, I don't feel any compelling reason to ever use JSF
over Struts unless JSF becomes a huge marketing success.
What
On Apr 1, 2005 8:23 AM, Benedict, Paul C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So is Craig's advice to abandon Struts tags even in a Struts app? Write out
> HTML elements yourself and get the values with expressions?
No. My advice is to plan on using JSF components for the UI part.
That can be an orthog
> So what is the difference between and ?
Both mark off arbitrary blocks of text. is like in that it implies
a line break before and after the division. does not cause a line
break, so it can be used in the middle of a line.
--
Tim Slattery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll be damned. You let everyone in the World know, including Jakarta Apache.
Jack
[Trying to be a bit comical about this guy who put his email on auto
to Jakarta. No biggie?]
On Apr 1, 2005 9:32 AM, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vat iskee sayging?
>
> --
> James Mitchell
> Soft
is a block element.
is an inline element.
(Yes, those are technical terms)
-Justin
-Original Message-
From: Dave Newton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 1:09 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: CSS class name in bean:message ???
[EMAIL PROTECTED] w
On Apr 1, 2005 11:31 AM, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You have a point, Frank, but more importantly, people have to
> remember that the original MVC pattern applied to an event driven
> unified runtime environment, not a request/response environment.
Back when we were writing Struts I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what is the difference between and ?
I think s are more "in-line" whereas a "div" is like a layer. Or
something. But if you're just wrapping something inside another html
chunk a span is probably more appropriate.
Bah, presentation-side.
Dave
Hello,
I have been building an appliction using the Struts framework for a couple of
weeks and am starting to get a good feel for using it. So far I have been using
ActionForms and am pleased with them.
As I was going over the job specification yesterday, I noticed I am coming up
on a large
The primary difference between the and tags is that
doesn't do any formatting of it's own. The tag acts as a paragraph
break, because it is defining a logical division in the document. The
tag simply tells the browser to apply the style and align rules
to whatever is within the .
--
Frank
James Mitchell wrote:
I already unsubscribed that guy. So we're having a bit of fun with it
now.
Ah, I wondered why I hadn't filtered anymore since I started it. Whew :)
Dave
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addit
So what is the difference between and ?
--
Thanks...
Mick Knutson
Systems Developer
Business Direct Services, Wells Fargo Bank
333 Market Street, SF, CA 94103
(415) 371-2553
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MAC A0103-223
"This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
ar
I already unsubscribed that guy. So we're having a bit of fun with it now.
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance
EdgeTech, Inc.
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
Yahoo: jmitchtx
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Dav
Tankx. Bi za vay, eye vas jes kidn ;)
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance
EdgeTech, Inc.
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
Yahoo: jmitchtx
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Smith, Thad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "St
Smith, Thad wrote:
My German is rough, but something about being condemned and thanks for explaining the whole world...Strange.
No no, TOO the whole world, with a hint of implied needless repitition.
I've gotten about a dozen of the out-of-office msgs this morning; it IS
pretty irritating, so
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I add a css class id to a message?
You can wrap it in a :)
bean:message just retrieves values; it doesn't (and shouldn't) know
anything about presentation, I'd think.
Dave
-
To unsubscribe, e-mai
James Mitchell wrote:
Vat iskee sayging?
We're condemned to being bombarded with wads of out-of-office messages.
The whole world knows, including us.
d
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
My German is rough, but something about being condemned and thanks for
explaining the whole world...Strange.
Thad Smith
Senior Software Engineer
ERCOT
-Original Message-
From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 11:33 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List; D
Roughly, in my school German:
"I was damned. Thanks for the Demonstrator, from the whole World, including
Jakarta Apache."
Not sure it makes sense.
Der Erklärer = the demonstrator or exponent
Ganzen Welt = the whole world
Vat iskee sayging?
.
Ich werde verdammt. Dank für das Erk
What do you mean? the return value of bean:message is simple text, not
html. You can always wrap the bean:message with a div tag I suppose.
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance
EdgeTech, Inc.
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
Yahoo: jmitcht
Vat iskee sayging?
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance
EdgeTech, Inc.
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
Yahoo: jmitchtx
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Dakota Jack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Ich werde verdammt. Dank für das Erklären der ganzen Welt,
einschließlich Jakarta Apache.
Jack
On Apr 1, 2005 8:45 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ich bin bis 01.05.2005 nicht zu erreichen. In dringenden Fällen kontaktieren
> Sie bitte:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
"Yo
Frank,
I like your M+V+C channeling examples!
Thanks.
ATTA
On Apr 1, 2005 5:53 AM, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "...we might as well be discussing how many angels can dance on the head
> of a pin"
>
> 639. 704 if they all go to LA Weight Loss for 3 months. But either way
>
Can I add a css class id to a message?
--
Thanks...
Mick Knutson
Systems Developer
Business Direct Services, Wells Fargo Bank
333 Market Street, SF, CA 94103
(415) 371-2553
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MAC A0103-223
"This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are
About the ActionForms... I don't personally consider them part of
either layer. Tangentially, the same goes for Value Objects. They
straddle the line between two layers in my mind. They are the
channel through which the view communicates with the control layer,
and Value Objects are the chan
Anyone with document conversion (Word --> PDF, etc) Struts programs
out there? What is recommended? Cocoon, ? Thanks.
Jack
--
"You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back."
~Dakota Jack~
-
To u
Ich bin bis 01.05.2005 nicht zu erreichen. In dringenden Fällen kontaktieren
Sie bitte:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ich bin bis 01.05.2005 nicht zu erreichen. In dringenden Fällen kontaktieren
Sie bitte:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ich bin bis 01.05.2005 nicht zu erreichen. In dringenden Fällen kontaktieren
Sie bitte:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ich bin bis 01.05.2005 nicht zu erreichen. In dringenden Fällen kontaktieren
Sie bitte:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Benedict, Paul C wrote:
So is Craig's advice to abandon Struts tags even in a Struts app? Write out
HTML elements yourself and get the values with expressions?
Dunno. Craig?
I still use the html tags because they know about the app resources, but
I sometimes struggle a bit when I need to extend
Ich bin bis 01.05.2005 nicht zu erreichen. In dringenden Fällen kontaktieren
Sie bitte:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ich bin bis 01.05.2005 nicht zu erreichen. In dringenden Fällen kontaktieren
Sie bitte:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ich bin bis 01.05.2005 nicht zu erreichen. In dringenden Fällen kontaktieren
Sie bitte:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ich bin bis 01.05.2005 nicht zu erreichen. In dringenden Fällen kontaktieren
Sie bitte:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So is Craig's advice to abandon Struts tags even in a Struts app? Write out
HTML elements yourself and get the values with expressions?
-Original Message-
From: Dave Newton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 11:20 AM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: Is It Pos
Ich bin bis 01.05.2005 nicht zu erreichen. In dringenden Fällen kontaktieren
Sie bitte:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ich bin bis 01.05.2005 nicht zu erreichen. In dringenden Fällen kontaktieren
Sie bitte:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ich bin bis 01.05.2005 nicht zu erreichen. In dringenden Fällen kontaktieren
Sie bitte:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NetSQL wrote:
Craig McClanahan wrote:
I would caution new projects, however, to *not* use the Struts HTML
tags. That part of Struts has received fairly little developer
attention, and should be considered legacy at this point.
I would disagree. JSTL replaced some tag, but HTML tag is IMO best
pr
Hello,
Ok I had link..that is fine, I just wanted to see
Struts 1.3 in action with that app.
Thanx and regards
marco
-Original Message-
From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 April 2005 17:13
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: MailREader app / Str
Ich bin bis 01.05.2005 nicht zu erreichen. In dringenden Fällen kontaktieren
Sie bitte:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ich bin bis 01.05.2005 nicht zu erreichen. In dringenden Fällen kontaktieren
Sie bitte:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll see if I can fix that part of the (maven) nightly build. Look for it
in the next couple of days.
In the meantime, you can get the sources directly from subversion. Or (if
you have no desire to setup a svn client) you can ask/beg someone who
already has it to grab the latest and zip it up
Be careful using over .
The DefineTag creates both a scripting variable and a page scoped attribute,
so you can use bean:define and then use that in any struts tag, jstl tag, or
<% scriptlet %>, but not the same in reverse.
If you do c:set, only the scoped var is created, so doing and trying t
On Mar 31, 2005 10:40 PM, atta-ur rehman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dea all,
>
> I'm sure I've seen this topic before! Just can't remember where and
> google won't help either! Can anybody please explain which MVC layer
> form belongs?
>
> TIA.
>
> ATTA
>
So, Atta, so you don't have to googl
On Apr 1, 2005 8:53 AM, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps that's a politician's answer, avoid giving a real answer to a
> sticky question :) but I actually feel like that fits the evidence, so
> to speak. Depends on what the definition of "is" is I guess :)
OK, since we've ha
Craig McClanahan wrote:
I would caution new projects, however, to *not* use the Struts HTML
tags. That part of Struts has received fairly little developer
attention, and should be considered legacy at this point.
I would disagree. JSTL replaced some tag, but HTML tag is IMO best
practice and pro
On Mar 31, 2005 1:54 PM, Fumo, Vince <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok follow-up and I'm sure this one will take 2 seconds to answer..
>
> part 1) is there a JSTL way to do the ?
--
Jeff Beal
Webmedx, Inc.
Pittsburgh, PA USA
-
You can turn off the framework's validation, and specifically call
validate in the methods where you want it.
/** Java code off the top of my head; may not compile
public ActionForward create(mapping,form,request,response) {
ActionErrors validations = form.validate();
if (validations != null &
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
