Re: Sorry, but Nabble and ML suck

2015-10-31 Thread Martin Senne
Ted, thx. Should I repost? Am 31.10.2015 17:41 schrieb "Ted Yu" : > From the result of http://search-hadoop.com/?q=spark+Martin+Senne , > Martin's post Tuesday didn't go through. > > FYI > > On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Nicholas Chammas < > nicholas.cham...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Nabble is an

Re: Sorry, but Nabble and ML suck

2015-10-31 Thread Ted Yu
>From the result of http://search-hadoop.com/?q=spark+Martin+Senne , Martin's post Tuesday didn't go through. FYI On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Nicholas Chammas < nicholas.cham...@gmail.com> wrote: > Nabble is an unofficial archive of this mailing list. I don't know who > runs it, but it's no

Re: Sorry, but Nabble and ML suck

2015-10-31 Thread Martin Senne
Thanks Nicholas for clarifying. Having said, it's not about blaming but about improving. The fact that my post from Tuesday is not visible on nabble and that I received no answer let's me doubt it got posted correctl. On the other hand you can read my recent post. just irritated. Hope to se

Re: Sorry, but Nabble and ML suck

2015-10-31 Thread Nicholas Chammas
Nabble is an unofficial archive of this mailing list. I don't know who runs it, but it's not Apache. There are often delays between when things get posted to the list and updated on Nabble, and sometimes things never make it over for whatever reason. This mailing list is, I agree, very 1980s. Unfo