Thanks Nicholas for clarifying. Having said, it's not about blaming but about improving.
The fact that my post from Tuesday is not visible on nabble and that I received no answer let's me doubt it got posted correctl. On the other hand you can read my recent post. .... just irritated. Hope to see get things improved ... Cheers, Martin Am 31.10.2015 17:34 schrieb "Nicholas Chammas" <nicholas.cham...@gmail.com>: > Nabble is an unofficial archive of this mailing list. I don't know who > runs it, but it's not Apache. There are often delays between when things > get posted to the list and updated on Nabble, and sometimes things never > make it over for whatever reason. > > This mailing list is, I agree, very 1980s. Unfortunately, it's required by > the Apache Software Foundation (ASF). > > There was a discussion earlier this year > <https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spark-user/201412.mbox/%3CCAOhmDzfL2COdysV8r5hZN8f=NqXM=f=oy5no2dhwj_kveop...@mail.gmail.com%3E> > about > migrating to Discourse that explained why we're stuck with what we have for > now. Ironically, that discussion is hard to follow on the Apache archives > (which is precisely one of the motivations for proposing to migrate to > Discourse), but there is a more readable archive on another unofficial > site > <http://search-hadoop.com/m/q3RTtzu5vu1tD3w52&subj=Discourse+A+proposed+alternative+to+the+Spark+User+list> > . > > Nick > > On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 12:20 PM Martin Senne <martin.se...@googlemail.com> > wrote: > >> Having written a post on last Tuesday, I'm still not able to see my post >> under nabble. And yeah, subscription to u...@apache.spark.org was >> successful (rechecked a minute ago) >> >> Even more, I have no way (and no confirmation) that my post was accepted, >> rejected, whatever. >> >> This is very L4M3 and so 80ies. >> >> Any help appreciated. Thx! >> >
