; mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com>> wrote:
My last round of performance tests, I think was ~3 weeks
ago. It was doing fine with 400 concurrent users. No
performance impact on OpenMeetings itself.
If this Bean Injection would do anything? I'm not sure.
tests (not sure when :( )
(GSoC is coming and require some time :((( )
injection mechanism can be fixed :)
On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 at 05:40, seba.wag...@gmail.com
<mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com> mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com>> wrote:
My last round of performanc
te:
>
> I'll try to write some synthetic tests (not sure when :( )
> (GSoC is coming and require some time :((( )
>
> injection mechanism can be fixed :)
>
>
> On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 at 05:40, seba.wag...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
>> My last round of performance
05:40, seba.wag...@gmail.com
<mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com> <mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com>> wrote:
My last round of performance tests, I think was ~3 weeks ago. It
was doing fine with 400 concurrent users. No performance impact on
OpenMeetings itself.
If this Bea
I'll try to write some synthetic tests (not sure when :( )
(GSoC is coming and require some time :((( )
injection mechanism can be fixed :)
On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 at 05:40, seba.wag...@gmail.com
wrote:
> My last round of performance tests, I think was ~3 weeks ago. It was doing
> fi
My last round of performance tests, I think was ~3 weeks ago. It was doing
fine with 400 concurrent users. No performance impact on OpenMeetings
itself.
If this Bean Injection would do anything? I'm not sure. I can't imagine
that.
There is some evidence that this has been a perform
can you reproduce it on your servers and take a look on performance ?
Ali
On 3/26/21 3:44 AM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
maybe because of this one:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-2588
@Seba maybe you can check with your performance scripts?
On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 at 00:07
maybe because of this one:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-2588
@Seba maybe you can check with your performance scripts?
On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 at 00:07, Ali Alhaidary wrote:
>
> May be two week ago ...
>
> Ali
>
> On 3/25/21 7:59 PM, Maxim Solodovnik w
May be two week ago ...
Ali
On 3/25/21 7:59 PM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
or maybe you can remember the date when this build was created?
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 18:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
well
as you can see https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/OpenMeetings/job/openmeetings/
there is no build
or maybe you can remember the date when this build was created?
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 18:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>
> well
>
> as you can see https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/OpenMeetings/job/openmeetings/
> there is no build #262 anymore :(
> so I can't check what was changed :(
>
> any chan
well
as you can see https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/OpenMeetings/job/openmeetings/
there is no build #262 anymore :(
so I can't check what was changed :(
any chance you have this build saved locally?
if so open webapps/openmeetings/WEB-INF/lib/openmeetings-util-6.1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
with archiver
c
Production server is at the latest snapshot (build#285), we have been
noticing this since around build#262 until now
Ali
On 3/25/21 2:32 PM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
build#262 ...
what date does it have?
or maybe you can share the hash from OM -> About ?
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 18:28, Ali Alhai
build#262 ...
what date does it have?
or maybe you can share the hash from OM -> About ?
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 18:28, Ali Alhaidary wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As of after build#262, 6.1.0 snapshot, we noticed an increase of around
> 30% in CPU and RAM usage.
>
> Our production server used to be running
Hi,
As of after build#262, 6.1.0 snapshot, we noticed an increase of around
30% in CPU and RAM usage.
Our production server used to be running 50% of ram and CPU, however,
now, sometimes CPU goes up to 90%. The environment did change, that is 5
rooms, 7-12 members in a room audio only.
On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 05:12, seba.wag...@gmail.com
wrote:
> We did complete some performance testing:
> ~ 100 concurrent users
> ~ 10 conference rooms, 4 users in each, everyone has audio/video turned on
> ~ 2 webinar rooms, 26 users each, 1 presenter has audio/video turned on
&
...@gmail.com ezt írta (időpont: 2021. jan.
18., H, 22:12):
> We did complete some performance testing:
> ~ 100 concurrent users
> ~ 10 conference rooms, 4 users in each, everyone has audio/video turned on
> ~ 2 webinar rooms, 26 users each, 1 presenter has audio/video turned on
>
&
We did complete some performance testing:
~ 100 concurrent users
~ 10 conference rooms, 4 users in each, everyone has audio/video turned on
~ 2 webinar rooms, 26 users each, 1 presenter has audio/video turned on
Results can be seen here:
https://om-hosting.com/medium-server-performance-test
u say you switched ports and it got better?
> Or is this just an idea of what might cause problems?
>
>
> Best regards,
> Alex
>
>
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: kaffeesurrogat
> Gesendet: Freitag, 20. November 2020 16:13
> An: user@openmeetin
-
Von: kaffeesurrogat
Gesendet: Freitag, 20. November 2020 16:13
An: user@openmeetings.apache.org
Betreff: Re: optimize performance
Dear Alex,
which one is the port openmeetings is listing on ?
Still 5443 ?
I've posted a message with the subject
"Behind a companies firewall, cha
ings 5
> can’t.
>
> At least the way it is configured right now.
>
> So I’m trying to find a way to make OpenMeetings 5 handle bad
> connections in a better way.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Alex
>
>
>
>
>
&
nMeetings 5 handle bad connections
> in a better way.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Alex
>
>
>
>
>
> *Von:* Maxim Solodovnik
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 18. November 2020 10:04
> *An:* Openmeetings user-list
> *Betreff:* Re: optimize performance
>
&g
orked
> equally stable as OpenMeetings 4.
>
>
>
>
>
> What’s „demo-next“?
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Alex
>
>
>
>
>
> *Von:* Maxim Solodovnik
> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 17. November 2020 16:48
> *An:* Openmeetings user-list
> *Be
lly like it, if it worked
> equally stable as OpenMeetings 4.
>
>
>
>
>
> What’s „demo-next“?
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Alex
>
>
>
>
>
> *Von:*Maxim Solodovnik
> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 17. November 2020 16:48
> *An:* Openmeetings
Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. November 2020 16:48
An: Openmeetings user-list
Betreff: Re: optimize performance
Hello Alex,
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 21:29, Ninnig, Alexander
mailto:alexander.nin...@rechnungshof.rlp.de>>
wrote:
Hi Maxim,
we're still havin huge problems with people workin
oot hard nproc 65535
> root soft nofile 65535
> root hard nofile 65535
> # edit the following file
> user@ubuntu:~$ sudo vim /etc/pam.d/common-session
> # add this line to it
> session required pam_limits.so
> # logout and login and try the f
im /etc/pam.d/common-session
# add this line to it
session required pam_limits.so
# logout and login and try the following command
user@ubuntu:~$ ulimit -n
65535
reboot
Best regards,
Alex
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Maxim Solodovnik
Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. Novembe
I would expect: the stability will be improved :)
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 15:39, Ninnig, Alexander <
alexander.nin...@rechnungshof.rlp.de> wrote:
> Hi Maxim,
>
>
>
> alright, no „fs.file-max“, but all the rest. Did it. Let’s see, i fit
> positively affects the performan
Hi Maxim,
alright, no „fs.file-max“, but all the rest. Did it. Let’s see, i fit
positively affects the performance.
Best regards,
Alex
Von: Maxim Solodovnik
Gesendet: Montag, 16. November 2020 16:02
An: Openmeetings user-list
Betreff: Re: optimize performance
On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 at 21:00
17-285
>
> Fax: +49(0)6232/617-100
>
> Mail: alexander.nin...@rechnungshof.rlp.de
>
> Web: https://rechnungshof.rlp.de/
>
>
>
> *Von:* Maxim Solodovnik
> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 12. November 2020 16:35
> *An:* Openmeetings user-list
> *Betreff:* R
f.rlp.de>
Web: https://rechnungshof.rlp.de/
Von: Maxim Solodovnik
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. November 2020 16:35
An: Openmeetings user-list
Betreff: Re: optimize performance
It displays current value
from mobile (sorry for typos ;)
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020, 22:16 Ninnig, Alexander
mail
ue?
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Alex
>
>
>
>
>
> *Von:* Maxim Solodovnik
> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 12. November 2020 13:50
> *An:* Openmeetings user-list
> *Betreff:* Re: optimize performance
>
>
>
> 1024 is the default
>
> and it s
Hi,
uhm, ok, so it seems like my command didn’t really change anything but just
displayed the default-value?
Best regards,
Alex
Von: Maxim Solodovnik
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. November 2020 13:50
An: Openmeetings user-list
Betreff: Re: optimize performance
1024 is the default
and it seems
Best regards, let’s see if „ulimit“ changes the behaviour.
>
>
>
> Alex
>
>
>
>
>
> *Von:* Maxim Solodovnik
> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 12. November 2020 10:08
> *An:* Openmeetings user-list
> *Betreff:* Re: optimize performance
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
&
let’s see if „ulimit“ changes the behaviour.
Alex
Von: Maxim Solodovnik
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. November 2020 10:08
An: Openmeetings user-list
Betreff: Re: optimize performance
On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 at 16:05, Ninnig, Alexander
mailto:alexander.nin...@rechnungshof.rlp.de>>
wrote:
Hel
be username/password from the applicationContext.xml, right?
>
this is the user/password for TURN, I doubt you can use it
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Alex
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Von:* Maxim Solodovnik
> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 12. November 2020 03:43
> *An:*
Best regards,
Alex
Von: Maxim Solodovnik
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. November 2020 03:43
An: Openmeetings user-list
Betreff: Re: optimize performance
Hello Alex,
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 at 19:57, Ninnig, Alexander
mailto:alexander.nin...@rechnungshof.rlp.de>>
wrote:
Hello,
again, I have t
your answer somehow "breaks the thread"
please see my answer to your initial email :))
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 at 20:18, Ninnig, Alexander <
alexander.nin...@rechnungshof.rlp.de> wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> this might have been some sort of a stupid question. I just looked under
> administration / conf
Hello Alex,
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 at 19:57, Ninnig, Alexander <
alexander.nin...@rechnungshof.rlp.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> again, I have to say, that I really like OpenMeetings 5. When using OM5
> inhouse, everything works really well. The webcam-picture is extremely
> sharp and fluent.
>
> Problem
Hello again,
this might have been some sort of a stupid question. I just looked under
administration / configuration and reduced the framerate (cam.fps) from 30 to
15. I can also reduce the other values. Furthermore I can edit the XML-file on
the server in order to provide a smaller default-web
Hello,
again, I have to say, that I really like OpenMeetings 5. When using OM5
inhouse, everything works really well. The webcam-picture is extremely sharp
and fluent.
Problem is: because of Covid19, a lot of our employees are working from their
home and they don't have the best internet-band
Hello,
You can use `top`, `ps`, and lots of other tools to monitor performance
It is impossible to provide "universal" solution for "conference room 50
odd users."
In case this will be the room of type "conference" i.e. all participants
will have camera and/or micr
Dear team,
Still we are waiting for your response
How do we monitor the server performance and what are the tools used. at
the same time please advice us on configuring required memory and number of
cores per CPU for configuring conference room 50 odd users.
Thanks in advance
Hello Rodolfo,
What version are you currently using?
What performance issues are you observing?
What are JAVA options?
Have you googled for "Tomcat performance optimization"?
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 02:38, Rodolfo Gonzalez
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> are there any guides or hints on
Hi,
are there any guides or hints on how to improve the performance of OM in a
scenario of high demand and high load? How to configure it to be more
efficient?
Thanks,
Rodolfo.
Hello Stefan,
Actually screen sharing doesn't send any audio, it only perform screen
capture
The bigger the area, the better quality and the higher FPS - more
CPU+bandwidth is required
On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 at 16:47, Stefan Kühl wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> are there any experiences concerning the s
Hi all,
are there any experiences concerning the screen sharing settings?
If we tried this, we 've had a lot of problems with audio and delay.
Any suggestions?
Greetz Stefan
ted websocket for
> users(red5.log)
> >> On Mar 6, 2018, at 12:50, Peter Dähn wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> do you have "Rejected message" entries in red5.log?
> >>
> >> We had a problem with performance 2 years ag
ted websocket for users(red5.log)
>> On Mar 6, 2018, at 12:50, Peter Dähn wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> do you have "Rejected message" entries in red5.log?
>>
>> We had a problem with performance 2 years ago...
>>
>> Here is the thread
>&
We have websocket problems and disconnected websocket for users(red5.log)
> On Mar 6, 2018, at 12:50, Peter Dähn wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> do you have "Rejected message" entries in red5.log?
>
> We had a problem with performance 2 years ago...
>
&
Hi,
do you have "Rejected message" entries in red5.log?
We had a problem with performance 2 years ago...
Here is the thread
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openmeetings-dev/201601.mbox/%3C568CE937.9040208%40vcrp.de%3E
Maybe you should have a look at you java vm and its me
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 3:06 PM, محمد تشکری wrote:
>>>> in my test one video with 15+ audience (without audio/video) has the same
>>>> problem
>>>> 1) HP DL580: 80 Core CPU , With 128 GB RAM
>>>> 2) 300 Mbps+
>>>> 3) between 20-5
PU , With 128 GB RAM
>>> 2) 300 Mbps+
>>> 3) between 20-50 Mbps
>>>
>>>> On Mar 6, 2018, at 11:31, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Are you observing performance decrease in case only one user
>>>> presenting the vid
deo with 15+ audience (without audio/video) has the same
>> problem
>> 1) HP DL580: 80 Core CPU , With 128 GB RAM
>> 2) 300 Mbps+
>> 3) between 20-50 Mbps
>>
>>> On Mar 6, 2018, at 11:31, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>
>>> Are you observing perf
s
>
>> On Mar 6, 2018, at 11:31, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>
>> Are you observing performance decrease in case only one user
>> presenting the video?
>>
>> What are the characteristics of your server:
>> 1) amount of RAM
>> 2) available bandwidth
&g
in my test one video with 15+ audience (without audio/video) has the same
problem
1) HP DL580: 80 Core CPU , With 128 GB RAM
2) 300 Mbps+
3) between 20-50 Mbps
> On Mar 6, 2018, at 11:31, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>
> Are you observing performance decrease in case only one user
> pr
Are you observing performance decrease in case only one user
presenting the video?
What are the characteristics of your server:
1) amount of RAM
2) available bandwidth
3) bandwidth utilization
How are you running OM? using red5.sh? any customizations?
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2:55 PM, محمد
4.0.1 and 4.0.2
>>
>>
>> Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> در تاریخ سهشنبه ۶ مارس ۲۰۱۸
>> ساعت ۱۰:۳۰ نوشت:
>>>
>>> Hello All,
>>>
>>> recently we got several report regarding performance degradation in
>>>
m with 15+ users with Audio/Video
> in 4.0 and 4.0.1 and 4.0.2
>
>
> Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> در تاریخ سهشنبه ۶ مارس ۲۰۱۸
> ساعت ۱۰:۳۰ نوشت:
>>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> recently we got several report regarding performance degradation in
Hi Maxim,
As I mailed to you before this,
I have problem with 15+ users with Audio/Video
in 4.0 and 4.0.1 and 4.0.2
Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> در تاریخ سهشنبه ۶ مارس ۲۰۱۸
ساعت ۱۰:۳۰ نوشت:
> Hello All,
>
> recently we got several report regarding performance
Hello All,
recently we got several report regarding performance degradation in
rooms with lots of users 30+
Unfortunately this scenario is hard to test :(
Are you observing such degradation?
Can you help with testing/localizing the issue?
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
fidentiality Notice Regarding E-mail Messages
from Coscend Communications Solutions' posted at:
http://www.Coscend.com/Terms_and_Conditions.html
From: Usman Kazi [mailto:usman.k...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2016 3:25 AM
To: user@openmeetings.apache.org
Subject: Re: Op
an extra 3 Gb of RAM .
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/16/2016 10:29 AM, Daniel Baker wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am using Open Meetings in Virtual Box. It is running on Ubuntu.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Is there any special configuration of Open Meetings that I can do to
>>>> improve performance.
>>>>
>>>> I can see I can tweak some Java stuff, is there anything else ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Dan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
d install it on the host.
>>
>>
>> Should be able to grab an extra 3 Gb of RAM .
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/16/2016 10:29 AM, Daniel Baker wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>&g
e host.
>
>
> Should be able to grab an extra 3 Gb of RAM .
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> On 10/16/2016 10:29 AM, Daniel Baker wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I am using Open Meetings in Virtual Box. It is running on Ubuntu.
>&g
Ubuntu.
>
>
> Is there any special configuration of Open Meetings that I can do to
> improve performance.
>
> I can see I can tweak some Java stuff, is there anything else ?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dan
>
>
>
Meetings that I can do to
improve performance.
I can see I can tweak some Java stuff, is there anything else ?
Thanks,
Dan
Hi,
I am using Open Meetings in Virtual Box. It is running on Ubuntu.
Is there any special configuration of Open Meetings that I can do to
improve performance.
I can see I can tweak some Java stuff, is there anything else ?
Thanks,
Dan
Hello Andres,
It seems our "Performance Tuning Section" is outdated :(
Could you please file JIRA issue [1] so we can fix it?
Thanks in advance!
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Andrés Lorek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I
Hi!
I'm looking for the most convenient configuration for Red5 Highperf. I
noticed that the Java Options described in Performance Tuning section
<http://openmeetings.apache.org/JVMPerformanceTuning.html> are different
from the options used in Red5 releases (you can see them
sure
every OM release contains red5-highperf.sh script
On 15 September 2014 04:19, Mark Lin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> can i use the "Performance Tuning - red5auto start script " -
> http://openmeetings.apache.org/JVMPerformanceTuning.html
> for Openmeetings 2.2?
>
> T
Hello,
can i use the "Performance Tuning - red5auto start script " -
http://openmeetings.apache.org/JVMPerformanceTuning.html
for Openmeetings 2.2?
Thank you
You can find it here:
http://www.dataved.ru/2011/07/top-5-web-conferences.html
or here a larger one:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_conferencing_software
*Rodrigo Brandão*
21-4063.9033
21-9492.9686
Skype: rodrigotvq
*Plataforma colaborativa para Gestão e EAD*
*Ferramenta
Hello,
I saw a compairison on a rushian page. But I can't find it again.
Can anyone help me with a link to this page, or an other good site.
I neet it for a presentation tomorrow.
Best regards
Ed
_HOME" ]; then export RED5_HOME=.; fi
# Previous option set
export JAVA_OPTS="-Xrs -Xms512M -Xmx1024M -Xss128K -XX:NewSize=256m
-XX:SurvivorRatio=16 -XX:MinHeapFreeRatio=20
-XX:+ExplicitGCInvokesConcurrent -Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true
-Xverify:none"
# start Red5
echo "Setti
xei,
>did u check the logs which i have attached with my last
> email. did you find any in that logs?
>
> kamran asif
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Alexei Fedotov
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Kamran,
>> the bottleneck is usually in the network performan
HI Alexei,
did u check the logs which i have attached with my last
email. did you find any in that logs?
kamran asif
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Alexei Fedotov wrote:
> Hello Kamran,
> the bottleneck is usually in the network performance. You can check it
> using
Hello Kamran,
the bottleneck is usually in the network performance. You can check it
using the tools at the openmeetings login screen.
--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Kamran
77 matches
Mail list logo
