Our production server is less than 25% concurrent users of your test :-)

Ali

On 3/27/21 4:15 AM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
I'll try to write some synthetic tests (not sure when :( )
(GSoC is coming and require some time :((( )

injection mechanism can be fixed :)


On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 at 05:40, seba.wag...@gmail.com <mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com> <seba.wag...@gmail.com <mailto:seba.wag...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    My last round of performance tests, I think was ~3 weeks ago. It
    was doing fine with 400 concurrent users. No performance impact on
    OpenMeetings itself.

    If this Bean Injection would do anything? I'm not sure. I can't
    imagine that.

    There is some evidence that this has been a performance issue
    before: https://github.com/bironran/spring_issues_generic_provider
    <https://github.com/bironran/spring_issues_generic_provider>
    But I'm not sure if we are using the same mechanism as described
    in the above issue. We are usingĀ @Inject. The example is around
    usage of Provider pattern. Not sure if it is the same mechanism at
    the core.

    I can run another test with a smaller number of users and compare
    the metrics over the next few days.

    Thanks
    Seb

    Sebastian Wagner
    Director Arrakeen Solutions, OM-Hosting.com
    http://arrakeen-solutions.co.nz/ <http://arrakeen-solutions.co.nz/>
    https://om-hosting.com <https://om-hosting.com> - Cloud & Server
    Hosting for HTML5 Video-Conferencing OpenMeetings
    
<https://www.youracclaim.com/badges/da4e8828-743d-4968-af6f-49033f10d60a/public_url><https://www.youracclaim.com/badges/b7e709c6-aa87-4b02-9faf-099038475e36/public_url>


    On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 at 20:35, Ali Alhaidary
    <ali.alhaid...@the5stars.org <mailto:ali.alhaid...@the5stars.org>>
    wrote:

        can you reproduce it on your servers and take a look on
        performance ?

        Ali

        On 3/26/21 3:44 AM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
        > maybe because of this one:
        > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-2588
        <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-2588> ....
        >
        > @Seba maybe you can check with your performance scripts?
        >
        > On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 at 00:07, Ali Alhaidary
        <ali.alhaid...@the5stars.org
        <mailto:ali.alhaid...@the5stars.org>> wrote:
        >> May be two week ago ...
        >>
        >> Ali
        >>
        >> On 3/25/21 7:59 PM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
        >>> or maybe you can remember the date when this build was
        created?
        >>>
        >>> On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 18:47, Maxim Solodovnik
        <solomax...@gmail.com <mailto:solomax...@gmail.com>> wrote:
        >>>> well
        >>>>
        >>>> as you can see
        https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/OpenMeetings/job/openmeetings/
        <https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/OpenMeetings/job/openmeetings/>
        >>>> there is no build #262 anymore :(
        >>>> so I can't check what was changed :(
        >>>>
        >>>> any chance you have this build saved locally?
        >>>> if so open
        webapps/openmeetings/WEB-INF/lib/openmeetings-util-6.1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
        >>>> with archiver
        >>>> check /org/apache/openmeetings/util/version.properties
        >>>> send me `revision=8c63465` :)))
        >>>>
        >>>> On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 18:42, Ali Alhaidary
        <ali.alhaid...@the5stars.org
        <mailto:ali.alhaid...@the5stars.org>> wrote:
        >>>>> Production server is at the latest snapshot (build#285),
        we have been
        >>>>> noticing this since around build#262 until now
        >>>>>
        >>>>> Ali
        >>>>>
        >>>>> On 3/25/21 2:32 PM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
        >>>>>> build#262 ...
        >>>>>> what date does it have?
        >>>>>> or maybe you can share the hash from OM -> About ?
        >>>>>>
        >>>>>> On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 18:28, Ali Alhaidary
        <ali.alhaid...@the5stars.org
        <mailto:ali.alhaid...@the5stars.org>> wrote:
        >>>>>>> Hi,
        >>>>>>>
        >>>>>>> As of after build#262, 6.1.0 snapshot, we noticed an
        increase of around
        >>>>>>> 30% in CPU and RAM usage.
        >>>>>>>
        >>>>>>> Our production server used to be running 50% of ram
        and CPU, however,
        >>>>>>> now, sometimes CPU goes up to 90%. The environment did
        change, that is 5
        >>>>>>> rooms, 7-12 members in a room audio only.
        >>>>>>>
        >>>>
        >>>> --
        >>>> Best regards,
        >>>> Maxim
        >>>
        >
        >



--
Best regards,
Maxim

Reply via email to