stwiki with
>>>> the latest Haddock template ?
>>>>
>>>> It would be really helpful to help testing the template on more
>>>> browsers platforms.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> dirk
>>>>
>>>> -- For
ible to refresh digital spider.com.au/testwiki with
>>> the latest Haddock template ?
>>>
>>> It would be really helpful to help testing the template on more browsers
>>> platforms.
>>>
>>>
>>> dirk
>>>
>>> -
sers
>> platforms.
>>
>>
>> dirk
>>
>> ------ Forwarded message --
>> From: Dirk Frederickx
>> Date: Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:42 PM
>> Subject: Re: Haddock template and bugs
>> To: user@jspwiki.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> It would be really helpful to help testing the template on more browsers
> platforms.
>
>
> dirk
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Dirk Frederickx
> Date: Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:42 PM
> Subject: Re: Haddock template and bugs
> To: user@js
Hi Dirk,
On 27/06/15 21:32, Dirk Frederickx wrote:
> Harry, Dave,
>
> I may have found the issue: Findpages.js was wrongly spelled FindPages.js
> in the wro-haddock.xml !
> Not clear why on my machine this builds without errors...
>
> I just made a commit -- can you please try again.
Great, than
Harry, Dave,
I may have found the issue: Findpages.js was wrongly spelled FindPages.js
in the wro-haddock.xml !
Not clear why on my machine this builds without errors...
I just made a commit -- can you please try again.
@Harry,
The "OS/2: bad linegap" on the font.woff file is new to me.
I did
Starting with an empty browser cache and no cookies for localhost, I get
this on the jspwiki home page :
TypeError: wiki.Findpages is not a constructor haddock.js:12284:0
downloadable font: OS/2: bad linegap: -32 (font-family: "FontJspwiki"
style:normal weight:normal stretch:normal src index:1) s
Dave,
All seems fine to me w.r.t your setup.
>From the logs you shared, it is clear the HADDOCK.JS fails during
startup. ("e.Findpages" fails)
The result is that all js driven functionality does not get active; you
can view the pages; but not use any of the dynamic styles, ajax searches
etc.
Hi Dirk/All
On 27/06/15 00:07, Dave Koelmeyer wrote:
> Awesome, thanks. I've switched to Haddock full time to test, and I've
> started opening bug reports with issues I've found:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-885
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-886
> https://iss
Dave,
Txs! I'll have a look into those.
dirk
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Dave Koelmeyer <
dave.koelme...@davekoelmeyer.co.nz> wrote:
>
> On 23/06/15 08:42, Dirk Frederickx wrote:
> > Dave, all,
> >
> > I just posted a large update of the HADDOCK template. (2.10.2-svn-17)
> > It stabilise
On 23/06/15 08:42, Dirk Frederickx wrote:
> Dave, all,
>
> I just posted a large update of the HADDOCK template. (2.10.2-svn-17)
> It stabilises the plain editor, and has many UI improvements. (more detail
> in change notes)
>
> The HADDOCK template is now close to completion, but needs further
>
Dave, all,
I just posted a large update of the HADDOCK template. (2.10.2-svn-17)
It stabilises the plain editor, and has many UI improvements. (more detail
in change notes)
The HADDOCK template is now close to completion, but needs further
hardening.
(group related JSPs still need to be done ;
On 27/05/15 09:13, Dirk Frederickx wrote:
Dave,
Yes, whenever HADDOCK gets more stabilised it's a candidate to become the
new default.
Feedback is much appreciated ! -- plse file your bugs in Jira
Thanks, and will do :)
--
Dave Koelmeyer
http://blog.davekoelmeyer.co.nz
Dave,
Yes, whenever HADDOCK gets more stabilised it's a candidate to become the
new default.
Feedback is much appreciated ! -- plse file your bugs in Jira.
Obviously, as the Plain Vanilla skin is today's default, please report
any issues as well.
The plain editor in HADDOCK is not yet avail.
14 matches
Mail list logo
