David, Txs -- this is really helpful !
dirk On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:32 PM, David Vittor <dvit...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > If anyone is interested in doing some more testing on the haddock > template, I've updated my wiki to use JSPWiki v2.10.2-svn-28 > http://www.digitalspider.com.au/testwiki/ > > Note: Dirk I've fixed my deployment process, where I was using an old > version of haddock.js. This should now be functioning correctly. > > Cheers, > David V > > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:08 PM, David Vittor <dvit...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Link is here: >> http://www.digitalspider.com.au/testwiki/ >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 1:07 PM, David Vittor <dvit...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Dirk, >>> >>> I've managed to update the wiki now so you can test it here. Sorry for >>> the delay. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 4:30 AM, Dirk Frederickx < >>> dirk.frederi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Hi David, >>>> >>>> >>>> Would it be possible to refresh digital spider.com.au/testwiki with >>>> the latest Haddock template ? >>>> >>>> It would be really helpful to help testing the template on more >>>> browsers platforms. >>>> >>>> >>>> dirk >>>> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>> From: Dirk Frederickx <dirk.frederi...@gmail.com> >>>> Date: Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:42 PM >>>> Subject: Re: Haddock template and bugs >>>> To: user@jspwiki.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>>> Dave, all, >>>> >>>> I just posted a large update of the HADDOCK template. (2.10.2-svn-17) >>>> It stabilises the plain editor, and has many UI improvements. (more >>>> detail in change notes) >>>> >>>> The HADDOCK template is now close to completion, but needs further >>>> hardening. >>>> (group related JSPs still need to be done ; and login/preferences >>>> needs some more tweaking) >>>> >>>> I expect to post more documentation during the coming weeks. >>>> >>>> >>>> br, >>>> dirk >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Dave Koelmeyer < >>>> dave.koelme...@davekoelmeyer.co.nz> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 27/05/15 09:13, Dirk Frederickx wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Dave, >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, whenever HADDOCK gets more stabilised it's a candidate to become >>>>>> the >>>>>> new default. >>>>>> Feedback is much appreciated ! -- plse file your bugs in Jira >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, and will do :) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Dave Koelmeyer >>>>> http://blog.davekoelmeyer.co.nz >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
