Ok, good. Thanks for your response.
/Dan
Den sön 5 jan. 2020 11:52Igal Shilman skrev:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Having a class that defines only the function types indeed makes sense,
> this would lower the coupling between the (maven) module that contains the
> function implementation and the (maven) modu
Hi Dan,
Having a class that defines only the function types indeed makes sense,
this would lower the coupling between the (maven) module that contains the
function implementation and the (maven) module that uses it.
You can peek here for example:
https://github.com/ververica/stateful-functions/bl
Hi,
What is the preferred way to expose functions (FunctionTypes) between
modules?
For example lets say i have the following maven modules:
-> common
-> statistics
-> persister
-> tradematching
and I have some FunctionTypes in common and persister module that should be
reach
from all modules.
