Ok, good. Thanks for your response. /Dan
Den sön 5 jan. 2020 11:52Igal Shilman <i...@ververica.com> skrev: > Hi Dan, > > Having a class that defines only the function types indeed makes sense, > this would lower the coupling between the (maven) module that contains the > function implementation and the (maven) module that uses it. > You can peek here for example: > > > https://github.com/ververica/stateful-functions/blob/master/stateful-functions-examples/stateful-functions-shopping-cart-example/src/main/java/com/ververica/statefun/examples/shoppingcart/Identifiers.java#L28 > > Igal. > > On Saturday, January 4, 2020, Dan Pettersson <dan.pettersso...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> What is the preferred way to expose functions (FunctionTypes) between >> modules? >> >> For example lets say i have the following maven modules: >> >> -> common >> -> statistics >> -> persister >> -> tradematching >> >> and I have some FunctionTypes in common and persister module that should >> be reach >> from all modules. >> >> common module is included everywhere so I thought about creating >> a helper class, CallableFunctions, and there specify the FunctionTypes >> that can >> be called from all modules. Is this the right approach or is there a >> better way? >> >> Regards >> Dan >> >
