Hi Izual,
thanks for contributing and improving the documentation. The PR will be
picked up as part of our regular maintenance work. The communication will
happen through PR conversations as soon as someone picks it up.
Best,
Matthias
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 8:44 AM izual wrote:
> I tried to fix
I tried to fix the small mistake of sample code in State-Processor-API doc[1],
could someone do a doc review[2] for me, thank you.
1:
https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/dev/libs/state_processor_api.html#keyed-state
2: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13266
At 2020-0
Sry for wrong post.
> This can probably be confirmed by looking at the exception stack trace.
> Can you post a full copy of that?
I missed the history jobs, but I think u r right.
When I debug the program to find reason, came into these code snippet.
```
TypeSerializerSchemaCompatibility result
Hi Izual,
Thanks for reporting this! I'm also forwarding this to the user mailing
list, as that is the more suitable place for this question.
I think the usability of the State Processor API in Scala is indeed
something that hasn’t been looked at closely yet.
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 8:12 AM izua
