Hi Community,
Currently we are using version 1.12.7 and it is running without any issue.
And we see that version 1.17 is set to release early next year.
That means we would be 5 versions behind.
1) So how far can we lag behind the current flink version ?
2) If we face any issues like log4j that
Such sql should be finished quickly.
Could you please look at which part cost much time? Starting the job or running
the job or other stuff.
And how about the network?
Btw, what's the logic plan and physical plan? You can use `explain select *
from scrm_admin_role limit 10` to show the plan.
Hi, sorry about the late response.
Currently the sql client queries connect to a Kafka topic to read events,
so I don't think it'll be reproducible. I'm using Flink 1.15, and running
it in a Docker image on Mac OS with M1 chip.
I also noticed that multiple queries in a sql client session continue
I created a table using Flink SQL on yarn session.
CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE `scrm_admin_role` (
> `id` bigint,
> `role_name` string,
> `sort` int,
> `type` tinyint,
> `status` tinyint,
> `tenant_id` bigint,
> `deleted` BOOLEAN,
> `create_time` TIMESTAMP,
> `update_time` TIMESTAMP,
Hi all,
Looking at the blog with details
https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2022/11/01/email-address-overflows it's
shown that vulnerability has been downgraded to High. I don't think that
warrants an emergency re-release of the images.
Best regards,
Martijn
Op di 1 nov. 2022 om 15:06 schreef Ch
We just push new images with the same tags.
On 01/11/2022 14:35, Matthias Pohl wrote:
The Docker image for Flink 1.12.7 uses an older base image which comes
with openssl 1.1.1k. There was a previous post in the OpenSSL mailing
list reporting a low vulnerability being fixed with 3.0.6 and 1.1.1r
The Docker image for Flink 1.12.7 uses an older base image which comes with
openssl 1.1.1k. There was a previous post in the OpenSSL mailing list
reporting a low vulnerability being fixed with 3.0.6 and 1.1.1r (both
versions being explicitly mentioned) [1]. Therefore, I understand the post
in a way
the dependency flink-connector-files is needed.
Best regards,
Yuxia
发件人: "Pavel Penkov"
收件人: "User"
发送时间: 星期二, 2022年 11 月 01日 下午 6:06:43
主题: Could not find any factory for identifier 'filesystem'
I'm trying to run a Flink job as a standalone program and getting the following
error.
C
I'm trying to run a Flink job as a standalone program and getting the
following error.
Caused by: org.apache.flink.table.api.ValidationException: Could not find
any factory for identifier 'filesystem' that implements
'org.apache.flink.table.factories.DynamicTableFactory' in the classpath.
Availab
Hi devs and users,
I'd like to share some highlights about the 1.17 release sync on 11/1/2022.
- The release sync is scheduled for biweekly Tuesdays at 9am (Central
European Standard Time) / 4pm (China Standard Time).
- Retrospective for 1.16: a discussion [1] is opened by Matthias for
collectin
10 matches
Mail list logo