Hi Prasanna,
IIUC, your screenshot shows the scaling feature of an EMR cluster, not
Flink.
Let me try to better understand your question. Which kind of rescaling do
you need?
- If you deploy a long running streaming job, and want it to dynamically
rescale based on the real-time incoming data stre
Thanks Xintong and Yu Yang for the replies,
I see AWS provides deploying Flink on EMR out of the box. There they have
an option of EMR cluster scaling based on the load.
Is this not equal to dynamic rescaling ?
[image: Screen Shot 2020-06-15 at 9.23.24 AM.png]
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/emr/l
Hi Thomas
The answer is yes. Without high availability, once the job manager is down and
even the job manager is relaunched via YARN, the job graph and last checkpoint
would not be recovered.
Best
Yun Tang
From: Thomas Huang
Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2020 22:58
To
Hello Flink community. I need help. Thus far, Flink has proven very useful
to me.
I am using it for stream processing of time-series data.
For the scope of this mailing list, let's say the time-series has the
fields: name: String, value: double, and timestamp: Instant.
I named the time series: t
Hi Jaswin,
Currently the state belongs to single operators, thus it should be not
possible to share states between different operators. Could you also share the
original problem want to solve by sharing states ?
Best,
Yun
--Original Mail --
Sender:Jaswin S
Hi Flink Community,
Currently, I'm using yarn-cluster mode to submit flink job on yarn, and I
haven't set high availability configuration (zookeeper), but set restart
strategy:
env.getConfig.setRestartStrategy(RestartStrategies.fixedDelayRestart(10, 3000))
the attempt time is 10 and the wait
Hi,
Is it possible to create the shared state(MapState) between two different
keyedProcessFunction? If it's possible, how can we do that in flink?
Thanks,
Jaswin
Hi
Can process function[1] can meet your needs here?, you can do the TTL logic
using timers in process functions.
[1]
https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-release-1.10/dev/stream/operators/process_function.html
Best,
Congxian
Timo Walther 于2020年6月10日周三 下午9:36写道:
> Hi Annemarie,
>
>
Hi
Could you please share why you need `MapState` instead
of `MapState>`
Best,
Congxian
Oytun Tez 于2020年6月14日周日 上午3:39写道:
> Correct me @everyone if I'm wrong, but you cannot keep State inside State
> in that way. So change your signature to: MapState>
>
> The underlying mechanism wouldn't mak