Hi Could you please share why you need `MapState<String, ListState>` instead of `MapState<String, List<...>>`
Best, Congxian Oytun Tez <oy...@motaword.com> 于2020年6月14日周日 上午3:39写道： > Correct me @everyone if I'm wrong, but you cannot keep State inside State > in that way. So change your signature to: MapState<String, List<...>> > > The underlying mechanism wouldn't make sense in this state-inside-state > shape. > > > > -- > > [image: MotaWord] > Oytun Tez > M O T A W O R D | CTO & Co-Founder > oy...@motaword.com > > <https://www.motaword.com/blog> > > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 3:32 PM Jaswin Shah <jaswin.s...@outlook.com> > wrote: > >> I need some representation like this: >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Jaswin Shah <jaswin.s...@outlook.com> >> *Sent:* 14 June 2020 01:01 >> *To:* user@flink.apache.org <user@flink.apache.org> >> *Subject:* MapState in flink >> >> Hi, >> Can anyone please help me on how can I create a MapState of ListState in >> flink, does flink support the same and if supports, how to declare the >> descriptor for same state data structure? >> If it is not supported, how may I create similar datastructure for state >> in flink? >> >> Thanks, >> Jaswin >> >
