On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Ashley Aitken wrote:
>> Having used to actively develop Cayenne applications, but more
>> recently having to develop using JPA, which uses an AR approach, I can
>> say that it doesn't actually work or help to mix AR and Unit-of-work
>> Cayenne DataContext concepts.
On 30/12/2012, at 1:50 AM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Ashley Aitken wrote:
>> Finally, I am also not sure how something like ActiveRecord approach would
>> actually work, or be compatible with, Cayenne. To my mind it defeats the
>> whole purpose of having a c
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Ashley Aitken wrote:
> Finally, I am also not sure how something like ActiveRecord approach would
> actually work, or be compatible with, Cayenne. To my mind it defeats
> the whole purpose of having a container managing the persistence of a
> collection of objec
Hello All,
I hope you don't mind me jumping into this conversation but I find it very
interesting (particularly the discussion of rich vs. anemic domain models but
also of the ActiveRecord approach, especially today as alternative approaches
to persistence, under the banner of NOSQL, are gain
I think Andrus comment was directed at me. I didn't want to offend anyone.
However I am worried that this idea will lead to bad practices, with
people hanging query code on the entities, and business rules etc. which
leads to highly coupled code.
regards
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 3:47 AM, emeka o
