Sorry about that.
From: Andrus Adamchik
To: user@cayenne.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2012 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: Add ActiveRecord support to Cayenne
While we all have our own approaches to programming, let's filter the language
and keep a respectfu
While we all have our own approaches to programming, let's filter the language
and keep a respectful technical conversation. Some things said in this thread
are simply not appropriate, besides being beyond the point. We are not going to
tolerate this.
We have a traditionally friendly community
@Malcolm Edgar
My friends from Luxoft and Exigen Services use Rich Domain Model, also it
is used by Fowler, Evans.
Just read
http://www.amazon.com/Domain-Driven-Design-Tackling-Complexity-Software/dp/0321125215
It's really works. In perspective of multiple domains - for each creates
separate domai
I my experience the rich domain model is an anti-pattern leading to highly
coupled code which is fragile and difficult to maintain. I have known large
commercial projects to grind to a halt following this design pattern, they
get to a point where the code base cannot be economically extended becaus
There is not much I can tell you about WO than pointing you to the following
link
http://www.wocommunity.org
Regards.
From: Juan José Gil
To: user@cayenne.apache.org; emeka okafor
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2012 3:48 AM
Subject: Re: Add ActiveRecord suppo
