This is a cluster of 2 nodes, each having 8G of operating memory,
replicationfactor=2
Write/read pressure is quite low and almost never exceeds 10/second
>From time to time (2-3 times in a month) I see GC activity in logs and for
>this time cassandra stops responding to requests which results i
ave a lot of CF's and/or secondary indexes ?
> Can you see log lines about the "liveRatio" for your cf's ?
> I would upgrade to 1.0.10 before getting too carried away though.
> Cheers
>
> -
> Aaron Morton
> Freelance Developer
> @aaronmorton
>
I have a testing cluster cassandra 1.1.2 with default memory and cache
settings, 1 CF, 1 KS, RF = 2
This is an empty cluster
10.111.1.141datacenter1 rack1 Up Normal 43.04 KB100.00%
0
10.111.1.142datacenter1 rack1
pping. Also which jvm do you use?
>
> kind regards
>
> Joost
>
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Nikolay Kоvshov wrote:
>
>> 21th I have mirgated to cassandra 1.1.2 but see no improvement
>>
>> cat /var/log/cassandra/Earth1.log | grep "GC for"
>&
I ran sar only recently after your advice and did not meet any huge GC-s on
that server
At 08:14 there was a GC lasting 4.5 seconds, that's not five minutes of course,
but also quite an unpleasant value;
Still I'm waiting for big GC values and will provide according sar logs.
07:25:01 PM pgp
13:07, "Joost van de Wijgerd" :
> You are better off using Sun Java 6 to run Cassandra. In the past
> there were issues reported on 7. Can you try running it on Sun Java 6?
>
> kind regards
>
> Joost
>
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Nikolay Kоvshov wrote:
&g
13:07, "Joost van de Wijgerd" :
> You are better off using Sun Java 6 to run Cassandra. In the past
> there were issues reported on 7. Can you try running it on Sun Java 6?
>
> kind regards
>
> Joost
>
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Nikolay Kоvshov wrote:
>
&g
java version : same
- RAM and CPU : 'bad' cluster has more
- Ubuntu version
- Networking
- What else???
26.07.2012, 10:25, "Nikolay Kоvshov" :
> Sun Java 6 didn't help it at all
>
> Sar shows no special activity on the long GC times
>
> And I have r
- JNA is not installed on both machines
30.07.2012, 14:44, "Mateusz Korniak" :
> On Monday 30 of July 2012, Nikolay Kоvshov wrote:
>
>> What I plan to compare between 'bad' cluster and 'good' cluster:
>>
>> - Configs, schemas, data etc: s
of July 2012, Nikolay Kоvshov wrote:
>
>> - JNA is not installed on both machines
>
> So your GC times may be strongly [1] affected by swapping.
> IIRC, also snapshotting is more expensive and may trigger more swapping.
> I would start with turning JNA mlockall on [2].
>
&
And the final solution
http://unbxd.com/blog/2012/07/java-and-ksoftirqd-100-cpu-due-to-leap-second/
Doing $ date -s "`date`" solved the problem.
30.07.2012, 16:09, "Nikolay Kоvshov" :
> You mean using swap memory? I have total of 48G of RAM and Cassandra never
>
Hello everybody
I have a very simple cluster containing 2 servers. Replication_factor = 2,
Consistency_level of reads and writes = 1
10.111.1.141datacenter1 rack1 Up Normal 1.5 TB 100.00%
vjpigMzv4KkX3x7z
10.111.1.142datacenter1 rack1 Up Normal 1.41 TB
ame token? The output indicates
> that 100% of your key range is assigned to 10.111.1.141 (and
> therefore 10.111.1.142 holds replicas only)
> 3/ maybe repair is being affected by above, but in my experience it can be
> sensitive
>
> On 13 February 2012 13:06, Nikolay Kоvshov w
I am using Cassandra 0.7.0 with following settings
binary_memtable_throughput_in_mb: 64
in_memory_compaction_limit_in_mb: 64
keys_cached 1 million
rows_cached 0
RAM for Cassandra 2 GB
I run very simple test
1 Node with 4 HDDs (1 HDD - commitlog and caches, 3 HDDs - data)
1 KS => 1 CF => 1 Colum
//www.datastax.com/docs/0.7/troubleshooting/index#nodes-are-dying-with-oom-errors
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Nikolay Kоvshov ;;
> wrote:
>> I am using Cassandra 0.7.0 with following settings
>>
>> binary_memtable_throughput_in_mb: 64
>> in_memory
assandra to guard against OOM, you must configure
> nodes such that the max memory usage on each node, that is max size all your
> caches and memtables can potentially grow to, is less than your heap size.
>
> From: Nikolay Kоvshov [nkovs...@
16 matches
Mail list logo