e time with pretty good results; it
> felt much cleaner than Hector.
>
> Paolo
>
> --
> @bernarpa
> http://paolobernardi.**wordpress.com <http://paolobernardi.wordpress.com>
>
>
--
Filipe Gonçalves
?
Also, shouldn't this be done in parallel, to avoid contacting
nodesmore than once?
--
Filipe Gonçalves
he code to change
the current behaviour, possiby more than it's worth for the potencial
gains.
2011/11/4 Sylvain Lebresne :
> 2011/11/4 Filipe Gonçalves :
>> Multiget slice queries seem to fetch rows sequentially, at least
>> fromwhat I understood of the sources. This means the n
tract any data, just a list of matching keys.
>
> TIA,
>
> Maxim
>
>
--
Filipe Gonçalves
ere is
>>> already solution about this, thanks a lot!
>>
>> use supercolumns unless your lists are very large.
>
>
--
Filipe Gonçalves
> it. Data is replicated
> so the data is still available in the cluster. How do I completely remove
> the dead node without having
> to rebuild it, repair, drain and decommission?
>
> TIA
> Maxim
>
>
--
Filipe Gonçalves
Variable Value f
>
>
>
> self
>
>
>
> args
>
>({'user50': {'User':
> [Mutation(column_or_supercolumn=ColumnOrSuperColumn(column=Column(timestamp=1322382778794088,
> name='password', value='password50', ttl=None), counter_super_column=None,
> super_column=None, counter_column=None), deletion=None),
>
> Mutation(column_or_supercolumn=ColumnOrSuperColumn(column=Column(timestamp=1322382778794088,
> name='name', value='User 50', ttl=None), counter_super_column=None,
> super_column=None, counter_column=None), deletion=None)]}},
> 1)
>
> app_exc
>
>TApplicationException(None,)
>
> new_f
>
>
>
> kwargs
>
>{}
>
>
>
>
>
--
Filipe Gonçalves
ord, validation_class: UTF8Type}];
>
> Do we always need to define key_validation_class as in the above query ?
> Isn't it not enough to add validation classes for each column ?
>
> Regards,
> ~Dinusha~
>
--
Filipe Gonçalves
t; (and securely), then what type of partitioner would be the best? Since the
> key values are already random, would it make a difference to use
> RandomPartitioner or one can use ByteOrderedPartitioner or
> OrderPreservingPartitioning as well and get the same result?
>
> -- Drew
>
--
Filipe Gonçalves
p://kkovacs.eu/cassandra-vs-mongodb-vs-couchdb-vs-redis
>>
>> It felt like the description of Cassandra painted a limiting
>> picture of its capabilities. Is there any Cassandra expert that could
>> improve that summary? is there any important thing missing? or is there a
>> more fitting common use case for Cassandra than what Mr. Kovacs has given?
>> (I believe/think that a Cassandra expert can improve that generic
>> description)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Igor
>>
>>
>>
>
--
Filipe Gonçalves
ncy Control Method is used in Cassandra? I found out
> so far
> that it's not done with the MVCC Method and that no vector clocks are
> being used.
> Thanks Helen
>
>
--
Filipe Gonçalves
11 matches
Mail list logo
