Unit testing means testing in isolation the smallest part.
Unit tests should not take more than a few milliseconds to set up and
verify their assertions.
As such, if your code is not factored well for testing, you would typically
use mocking (either by hand, or with mocking libraries) to mock out
My Cassandra ps info:
root 26791 1 0 07:14 ?00:00:00 /usr/bin/jsvc -user
cassandra -home /opt/java/64/jre1.6.0_32/bin/../ -pidfile
/var/run/cassandra.pid -errfile &1 -outfile /var/log/cassandra/output.log
-cp
/usr/share/cassandra/lib/antlr-3.2.jar:/usr/share/cassandra/lib/avro-1.4
Hi,
We are trying to roll upgrade from 1.0.12 to 1.2.5, but we found that the
1.2.5 node cannot see other old nodes.
Therefore, we tried to upgrade to 1.1.12 first, and it works.
However, we still saw the same issue when rolling upgrade from 1.1.12 to
1.2.5.
This seems to be the fixed issue as
htt
GC options are not set. You should see the followings.
-XX:+PrintGCDateStamps -XX:+PrintPromotionFailure
-Xloggc:/var/log/cassandra/gc-1371603607.log
> Is it normal to have two processes like this?
No. You are running two processes.
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Joel Samuelsson
wrote:
> M
Right, after getting the GC logging information I tested upgrading to 1.2.
Didn't help but I forgot to reenable the GC options.
> No. You are running two processes.
Ok, that's weird. I am using an unmodified version of a startup script in
/etc/init.d/cassandra from the Debian package. Here's some
The test tool I am using catches any exceptions on the original writes and
resubmits the write request until it's successful (bailing out after 5
failures). So for each key Cassandra has reported a successful write.
Nodetool says the following - I'm guessing the pending hinted handoff is the
2013/6/19 Takenori Sato :
> GC options are not set. You should see the followings.
>
> -XX:+PrintGCDateStamps -XX:+PrintPromotionFailure
> -Xloggc:/var/log/cassandra/gc-1371603607.log
>
>> Is it normal to have two processes like this?
>
> No. You are running two processes.
It's "normal" as this i
Hi,
Using Thrift, we are allowed to specify different TTL values for each columns
in a row.
But CQL3 doesn't provide a way for this.
For instance, this is allowed:
INSERT INTO users (user_name, password, gender, state) VALUES ('xamry2,
'aa', 'm', 'UP') using TTL 5;
But something like
Hi,
> But CQL3 doesn't provide a way for this.
That's not true. But the syntax is probably a bit more verbose than what you
were hoping for. Your example (where I assume user_name is you partition
key)
can be achieved with:
BEGIN BATCH
UPDATE users SET password = 'aa' WHERE user_name='x
Thanks Sylvian,
I am working on a high level client (Kundera) which, if users want, should be
able to achieve this, even if that's uncommon.
Writing Update Batch CQL is an approach that works, as you are saying
performance is not impacted.
In my opinion, an *optional* "USING TTL" with column v
Team,
Can anyone share real use cases in Cassandra?
Thanks & Regards,
Varada
Solution Architect/Business Information Management Services Practice
Polaris Financial Technology Limited
6th Floor, West Wing, Nxt lvl, Navalur
W:044-33418000*8613 M:9791700984 : VOIP:90-8613
E:varadaraja...@
Hi,
Have a look at DataStax's customers: http://www.datastax.com/customers
varadaraja...@polarisft.com a écrit sur 19/06/2013 12:48:50 :
> De : varadaraja...@polarisft.com
> A : user@cassandra.apache.org,
> Date : 19/06/2013 12:49
> Objet : Real Use Cases in Cassandra !!!
>
>
> Team,
>
>
Visit Planet cassandra website.. hosted by datastax..
On 19 Jun 2013, at 13:21, Romain HARDOUIN wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Have a look at DataStax's customers: http://www.datastax.com/customers
>
>
> varadaraja...@polarisft.com a écrit sur 19/06/2013 12:48:50 :
>
> > De : varadaraja...@polarisft.com
Thanks Eric. Is there a way to start manually compaction operations?
I'm thinking about doing after loading data and before start run phase of
the benchmark.
Thanks.
Att.
*Rodrigo Felix de Almeida*
LSBD - Universidade Federal do Ceará
Project Manager
MBA, CSM, CSPO, SCJP
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at
Hello Arthur,
What do you mean by "The queries need to be lightened"?
Thanks,
Shahb
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Arthur Zubarev wrote:
> Cem hi,
>
> as per http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/FAQ#dropped_messages
>
>
> Internode messages which are received by a node, but do not get not to b
Thanks Stephen for you reply and explanation. My bad that I mixed those up
and wasn't clear enough. Yes, I have different 2 requests/questions.
1) One is for the unit testing.
2) Second (in which I am more interested in) is for performance
(stress/load) testing. Let us keep integration aside for
Can anyone explain this to me? I have been looking through the source code but
can't seem to find the answer.
The documentation mentions using the token() function to change a value into
it's token for use in queries. It always mentions it as taking a single
parameter:
SELECT * FROM posts
You can start compaction via JMX if you need it and you know what you're
doing:
Find org.apache.cassandra.db:type=CompactionManager MBean and
forceUserDefinedCompaction operation in it.
First argument is keyspace name, second one is a comma-separated list of
SSTables to compact (filename)
You
For unit testing, we actually use PlayOrm which has an in-memory version of
nosql so we just write unit tests against our code which uses the in-memory
version but that is only if you are in java.
Later,
Dean
From: Shahab Yunus mailto:shahab.yu...@gmail.com>>
Reply-To: "user@cassandra.apache.org
Hi Shabab,
Cassandra-Unit has been helpful for us for running unit tests without requiring
a real cassandra instance to be running. We only use this to test our "DAO"
code which interacts with the Cassandra client. It basically starts up an
embedded instance of cassandra and fools your clien
I'm experimenting with a data model that will need to ingest a lot of data that
will need to be query able by time. In the example below, I want to be able to
run a query like "select * from count3 where counter = 'test' and ts >
minTimeuuid('2013-06-18 16:23:00') and ts < minTimeuuid('2013-06-
You really do not need much in java you can use the embedded server. Hector
wrap a simple class around thiscalled EmbeddedServerHelper
On Wednesday, June 19, 2013, Ben Boule wrote:
> Hi Shabab,
>
> Cassandra-Unit has been helpful for us for running unit tests without
requiring a real cassandra i
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:04 AM, aaron morton wrote:
>> Even more if we could automate some up-scale thanks to AWS alarms, It
>> would be awesome.
>
> I saw a demo for Priam (https://github.com/Netflix/Priam) doing that at
> netflix in March, not sure if it's public yet.
>
>> Are the vnodes featur
Hi,
Our Hadoop jobs will only do READs and we want to restrict reads in this
dedicated DC even if performances are bad.
What can we do to achieve this goal ?
- set dynamic_snitch_badness_threshold to 0.98 on these DC's nodes ? can we
have different dynamic_snitch_badness_threshold values on
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Ryan, Brent wrote:
>
> CREATE TABLE count3 (
> counter text,
> ts timeuuid,
> key1 text,
> value int,
> PRIMARY KEY ((counter, ts))
> )
>
Instead of doing a composite partition key, remove a set of parens and let
ts be your clustering key. That will c
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Ben Boule wrote:
> Can anyone explain this to me? I have been looking through the source
> code but can't seem to find the answer.
>
> The documentation mentions using the token() function to change a value
> into it's token for use in queries. It always menti
Hi Tyler,
I am interested in this scenario as well: could you please elaborate
further your answer?
Thanks a lot,
Davide
On 19 Jun 2013 16:01, "Tyler Hobbs" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Ryan, Brent wrote:
>
>>
>> CREATE TABLE count3 (
>> counter text,
>> ts timeuuid,
>> ke
You're using the ordered partitioner, right?
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Davide Anastasia <
davide.anasta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Tyler,
> I am interested in this scenario as well: could you please elaborate
> further your answer?
>
> Thanks a lot,
> Davide
> On 19 Jun 2013 16:01, "Tyler
I'm using the byte ordered partitioner.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 19, 2013, at 11:26 AM, "Sylvain Lebresne"
mailto:sylv...@datastax.com>> wrote:
You're using the ordered partitioner, right?
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Davide Anastasia
mailto:davide.anasta...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Tyle
How much data do you have per node?
How much RAM per node?
How much CPU per node?
What is the avg CPU and memory usage?
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Joel Samuelsson wrote:
> My Cassandra ps info:
>
> root 26791 1 0 07:14 ?00:00:00 /usr/bin/jsvc -user
> cassandra -home /opt
Tyler,
You're recommending this schema instead, correct?
CREATE TABLE count3 (
counter text,
ts timeuuid,
key1 text,
value int,
PRIMARY KEY (ts, counter)
)
I believe I tried this as well and ran into similar problems but I'll try it
again. I'm using the "ByteOrderedPartitioner" if th
Here's an example of that not working:
cqlsh:Test> desc table count4;
CREATE TABLE count4 (
ts timeuuid,
counter text,
key1 text,
value int,
PRIMARY KEY (ts, counter)
) WITH
bloom_filter_fp_chance=0.01 AND
caching='KEYS_ONLY' AND
comment='' AND
dclocal_read_repair_chance=0.0
Note that it seems to work when you structure your schema in this example
below, BUT this is a problem because all of my data will wind up hitting a
single node in my cassandra cluster because the partitioning key is "counter"
and that isn't unique enough. I was hoping that I wasn't going to ne
Hello,
We are considering using Cassandra and I want to make sure our use case
fits Cassandra's strengths. We have the table like:
answers
---
user_id | question_id | result | created_at
Where our most common query will be something like:
SELECT * FROM answers WHERE user_id = 123 AND creat
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 5:47 AM, Michal Michalski wrote:
> You can also perform a major compaction via nodetool compact (for
> SizeTieredCompaction), but - again - you really should not do it unless
> you're really sure what you do, as it compacts all the SSTables together,
> which is not somethin
I think you'd just be better served with just a little different primary
key.
If your primary key was (user_id, created_at) or (user_id, created_at,
question_id), then you'd be able to run the above query without a problem.
This will mean that the entire pantheon of a specific user_id will be
st
My company is planning on deploying cassandra to three separate datacenters.
Each datacenter will have a cassandra cluster with a separate set of seeds
specific to that datacenter. However, the cluster name will be the same.
Question 1: is this enough to guarentee that the three datacenters will h
So part of it is a bug, namely
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5666. In summary CQL3
should not accept: ts > minTimeuuid('2013-06-17 22:36:16') and ts <
minTimeuuid('2013-06-20 22:44:02'), because it does no know how to handle
it properly. What it should support is token(ts) >
token
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Faraaz Sareshwala
wrote:
> Each datacenter will have a cassandra cluster with a separate set of seeds
> specific to that datacenter. However, the cluster name will be the same.
>
> Question 1: is this enough to guarentee that the three datacenters will have
> dist
If you want, you can try to force the GC through Jconsole. Memory->Perform GC.
It theoretically triggers a full GC and when it will happen depends on the JVM
-Wei
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Coli"
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 10:43:13 AM
Subje
>
> On its face my answer is "not... really"? What do you view yourself as
> getting with this technique versus using built in replication? As an
> example, you lose the ability to do LOCAL_QUORUM vs EACH_QUORUM
> consistency level operations?
Doing replication manually sounds like a recipe for t
You have a lot of Dropped Mutations which means those writes might not go
through. Since you have CL.ONE as write consistency, your client doesn't see
the exception if write fails only on one node.
I think hints are only stored when the other node is down, not on the dropped
mutations. (Correct
Hi,
I believe what he's recommending is:
CREATE TABLE count3 (
counter text,
ts timeuuid,
key1 text,
value int,
PRIMARY KEY (counter, ts)
)
That way counter will be your partitioning key, and all the rows that have the
same counter value will be clustered (stored as a single wide row
Interesting, thank you for the reply.
Two questions though...
Why should created_at come before question_id in the primary key? In other
words, why (user_id, created_at, question_id) instead of (user_id,
question_id, created_at)?
Given this setup, all a user's answers (all 10k) will be stored i
So, if you want to grab by the created_at and occasionally limit by
question id, that is why you'd use created_at.
The way the primary keys work is the first part of the primary key is the
Partioner key, that field is what essentially is the single cassandra row.
The second key is the order prese
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Wei Zhu wrote:
> I think hints are only stored when the other node is down, not on the
> dropped mutations. (Correct me if I am wrong, actually it's not a bad idea
> to store hints for dropped mutations and replay them later?)
This used to be the way it worked pr
Hi,
I couldn't find any information on the following error so I apologize if it has
already been discussed.
On some of my nodes, I'm getting the following exception when cassandra starts
up:
2013-06-19 22:17:39.480414500 Exception encountered during startup: unable to
find sufficient sources fo
I am trying to see whether there will be any performance difference between
Cassandra 1.0.8 vs Cassandra 1.2.2 for reading the data mainly?
Has anyone seen any major performance difference?
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Raihan Jamal wrote:
> I am trying to see whether there will be any performance difference
> between Cassandra 1.0.8 vs Cassandra 1.2.2 for reading the data mainly?
>
> Has anyone seen any major performance difference?
>
We are part way through a performance compa
Rob,
Thanks.
I was not aware of that. So we can avoid repair if there is no hardware
failure...I found a blog:
http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/modern-hinted-handoff
-Wei
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Coli"
To: user@cassandra.apache.org, "Wei Zhu"
Sent: Wednesday, June 19
Thanks Edward, Ben and Dean for the pointers. Yes, I am using Java and
these sounds promising for unit testing, at least.
Regards,
Shahab
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Edward Capriolo wrote:
> You really do not need much in java you can use the embedded server.
> Hector wrap a simple class a
51 matches
Mail list logo
