In fact, phpcassa is doing his work quite well.
The error seems to be coming from cassandra, even if I still have to understand
why.
More precisely, the error is on the cql query prepare. I opened a bug for it,
as we discovered the same problem on 3 different clusters. Maybe is something
wron
Processes start differently on windows.
On windows it uses mklink to make a hard link
https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/trunk/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/utils/CLibrary.java#L170
Cheers
-
Aaron Morton
Freelance Developer
@aaronmorton
http://www.thelastpickle.com
On 6/0
Row keys are distinct.
Cheers
-
Aaron Morton
Freelance Developer
@aaronmorton
http://www.thelastpickle.com
On 6/07/2012, at 7:30 AM, Shahryar Sedghi wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am new to to Cassandra and we started with 1.1 and modeled everything with
> Composite columns and wide rows
I would do a test to see the latency difference under load between having 1 KS
with 5 CF's and 50 KS with 5 CF's.
Your test will need to read and write to all the CF's. Having many CF's may
result in more frequent memtables flushes.
(Personally it's not an approach I would take.)
Cheers
--
Something like:
This is how I did the write in CLI and this is what it printed.
and then
This is how I did the read in the CLI and this is what it printed.
It's hard to imagine what data is in cassandra based on code.
cheers
-
Aaron Morton
Freelance Developer
@aaronmorton
h
for background
http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/FAQ#range_rp
It maps the start key to a token, and then scans X rows from their on CL number
of nodes. Rows are stored in token order.
Cheers
-
Aaron Morton
Freelance Developer
@aaronmorton
http://www.thelastpickle.com
On 7/07/20
Did you try running ant clean first ?
Cheers
-
Aaron Morton
Freelance Developer
@aaronmorton
http://www.thelastpickle.com
On 8/07/2012, at 1:57 PM, Arya Goudarzi wrote:
> Hi Fellows,
>
> I used to be able to build cassandra 1.1 up to 1.1.1 with the same set
> of procedures by r
Thanks Aaron for your response. Some follow up
questions/assumptions/clarifications :
1. With RandomPartitioner, on a given node, are the keys sorted by
their hash_values or original/unhashed keys ?
2. With RandomPartitioner, on a given node, are the columns (for a
given key) always sorted by
inline resp.
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 10:18 AM, prasenjit mukherjee
wrote:
> Thanks Aaron for your response. Some follow up
> questions/assumptions/clarifications :
>
> 1. With RandomPartitioner, on a given node, are the keys sorted by
> their hash_values or original/unhashed keys ?
>
hash value