There really is no generic way of comparing these systems, NoSQL
databases are highly heterogeneous.
The only credible and accurate way of doing a comparison is for a
specific, well defined, use case. Other than that you are always going
to be comparing apples to oranges thus having an crappy (and
Don't trust NoSQL Benchmark. It's not a lie. but. NoSQL has different
performance in many different environment.
Do Benchmark with your real environment. and choose it.
Thank you.
2011/12/28 Igor Lino
> You are totally right. I'm far from being an expert on the subject, but
> the comparison fe
You are totally right. I'm far from being an expert on the subject, but the
comparison felt inconsistent and incomplete. (I could not express that in my
1st email, not to bias the opinion)
Do you know of any similar comparison, which is not biased towards some
particular technology or solution
> Also when comparing these technologies very subtle differences in design
> have profound in effects in operation and performance. Thus someone trying
> to paper over 6 technologies and compare them with a few bullet points is
> really doing the world an injustice.
+1. Same goes for 99% of all be
This is not really a comparison of anything because each NoSQL has its own
bullet points like:
Boats
great for traveling on water
Cars
great for traveling on land
So the conclusion I should gather is?
Also as for the Cassandra bullet points, they are really thin (and wrong).
Such as:
Cassan
Hi!
I was trying to get an understanding of the real strengths of Cassandra against
other competitors. Its actually not that simple and depends a lot on details on
the actual requirements.
Reading the following comparison:
http://kkovacs.eu/cassandra-vs-mongodb-vs-couchdb-vs-redis
It felt like
