Don't trust NoSQL Benchmark. It's not a lie. but. NoSQL has different performance in many different environment.
Do Benchmark with your real environment. and choose it. Thank you. 2011/12/28 Igor Lino <icampi...@gmx.de> > You are totally right. I'm far from being an expert on the subject, but > the comparison felt inconsistent and incomplete. (I could not express that > in my 1st email, not to bias the opinion) > > Do you know of any similar comparison, which is not biased towards some > particular technology or solution? (so not coming from > http://cassandra.apache.org/) > I want to understand how superior is Cassandra in its latest release > against closer competitors, ideally with the opinion from expert guys. > > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > This is not really a comparison of anything because each NoSQL has its > own bullet points like: > Boats > great for traveling on water > Cars > great for traveling on land > So the conclusion I should gather is? > Also as for the Cassandra bullet points, they are really thin (and > wrong). Such as: > Cassandra: > Best used: When you write more than you read (logging). If every > component of the system must be in Java. ("No one gets fired for choosing > Apache's stuff.") > I view that as: > Nonsensical, inaccurate, and anecdotal. > Also I notice on the other side (and not trying to pick on hbase, but) > hbase: > No single point of failure > Random access performance is like MySQL > Hbase has several SPOF's, its random access performance is definitely > NOT 'like mysql', > Cassandra ACTUALLY has no SPOF but as they author mentions, he/she does > not like Cassandra so that fact was left out. > From what I can see of the writeup, it is obviously inaccurate in > numerous places (without even reading the entire thing). > Also when comparing these technologies very subtle differences in > design have profound in effects in operation and performance. Thus someone > trying to paper over 6 technologies and compare them with a few bullet > points is really doing the world an injustice. > On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Igor Lino <icampi...@gmx.de> wrote: > > Hi! > > I was trying to get an understanding of the real strengths of > Cassandra against other competitors. Its actually not that simple and > depends a lot on details on the actual requirements. > > Reading the following comparison: > http://kkovacs.eu/cassandra-vs-mongodb-vs-couchdb-vs-redis > > It felt like the description of Cassandra painted a limiting > picture of its capabilities. Is there any Cassandra expert that could > improve that summary? is there any important thing missing? or is there a > more fitting common use case for Cassandra than what Mr. Kovacs has given? > (I believe/think that a Cassandra expert can improve that generic > description) > > Thanks, > Igor > > > >
