sorry, I missed it since it's not executable by default.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Jason Wee wrote:
> It should be in the trunk, check it
> https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/trunk/bin/cassandra-shuffle
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:18 AM, Manu Zhang wrote:
>
>> Is cassandra-shu
It should be in the trunk, check it
https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/trunk/bin/cassandra-shuffle
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:18 AM, Manu Zhang wrote:
> Is cassandra-shuffle command in the trunk? Or it is only included in the
> Debian package? I don't find it in the trunk.
>
>
> On Sat, No
Is cassandra-shuffle command in the trunk? Or it is only included in the
Debian package? I don't find it in the trunk.
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 2:18 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 12:38 AM, Manu Zhang
> wrote:
> >> It splits into a contiguous range, because truly upgrading to vno
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 12:38 AM, Manu Zhang wrote:
>> It splits into a contiguous range, because truly upgrading to vnode
>> functionality is another step.
>
> That confuses me. As I understand it, there is no point in having 256 tokens
> on same node if I don't commit the shuffle
This isn't exac
>
> It splits into a contiguous range, because truly upgrading to vnode
> functionality
> is another step.
That confuses me. As I understand it, there is no point in having 256
tokens on same node if I don't commit the shuffle
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Brandon Williams wrote:
> On Thu,
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Manu Zhang wrote:
>
>> it will migrate you to virtual nodes by splitting the existing partition
>> 256 ways.
>
>
> Out of curiosity, is it for the purpose of avoiding streaming?
It splits into a contiguous range, because truly upgrading to vnode
functionality is a
> it will migrate you to virtual nodes by splitting the existing partition
> 256 ways.
Out of curiosity, is it for the purpose of avoiding streaming?
the former would require you to perform a shuffle to achieve that.
Is there a nodetool option or are there other ways "shuffle" could be done
a
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:38 AM, John Sanda wrote:
> Can/should i assume that i will get even range distribution or close to it
> with random
> token selection?
The short answer is: If you're using virtual nodes, random token
selection will give you even range distribution.
The somewhat longer
I am not entirely clear on what
http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/VirtualNodes/Balance#imbalance is saying
with respect to random vs. manual token selection. Can/should i assume that
i will get even range distribution or close to it with random token
selection? For the sake of discussion, what is a