Thanks all, I really appreciate the input.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Jonathan Haddad wrote:
> Yes... I agree with Rob here. I don't see much benchmarking required for
> versions of Cassandra that aren't actively supported by the committers.
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:52 AM Robert Co
Yes... I agree with Rob here. I don't see much benchmarking required for
versions of Cassandra that aren't actively supported by the committers.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:52 AM Robert Coli wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Andy Kruth wrote:
>
>> We are trying to decide how to proceed
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Andy Kruth wrote:
> We are trying to decide how to proceed with development and support of
> YCSB bindings for older versions of Cassandra, namely Cassandra 7, 8, and
> 10.
>
> We would like to continue dev and support on these if the use of those
> versions of Ca
I assume you mean Cassandra 0.7, 0.8, and 1.0? I think most users are on
2.x now, but I don't have any stats.
--
Michael Mior
michael.m...@gmail.com
2015-12-15 9:28 GMT-05:00 Andy Kruth :
> We are trying to decide how to proceed with development and support of
> YCSB bindings for older versions
We are trying to decide how to proceed with development and support of YCSB
bindings for older versions of Cassandra, namely Cassandra 7, 8, and 10.
We would like to continue dev and support on these if the use of those
versions of Cassandra is still prevalent. If not, then a deprecation cycle
may
