Yes... I agree with Rob here. I don't see much benchmarking required for versions of Cassandra that aren't actively supported by the committers.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:52 AM Robert Coli <rc...@eventbrite.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Andy Kruth <krut...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> We are trying to decide how to proceed with development and support of >> YCSB bindings for older versions of Cassandra, namely Cassandra 7, 8, and >> 10. >> >> We would like to continue dev and support on these if the use of those >> versions of Cassandra is still prevalent. If not, then a deprecation cycle >> may be the best idea, in favor of CQL based bindings for modern versions of >> Cassandra. >> >> Any input from the Cassandra community on how common the usage of >> Cassandra 7, 8, and 10 are would be very helpful, thanks a lot. >> > > Due to the adoption curve of Cassandra, very few people are left on these > versions. I very, very rarely encounter questions about the 0.x series here > or in #cassandra. > > Same is true to a slightly lesser extent for 1.0 series. Some shops rarely > upgrade, but those kinds of shops are unlikely to need rigorous performance > comparison courtesy of YCSB? > > =Rob > >
