Honestly, I'm hoping it's code rather than a database bug (and normally I'd
agree with you).
I'm working on a reduction to see if I can get a basic unit test.
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Jonathan Haddad wrote:
> Can you provide the code that you use to create the table? This feels
> li
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Kevin Burton wrote:
> Looks like C* isn't creating the table with the lowest value integer
> suffix. I created more tables and even if I reverse their order, the one
> with the lowest integer suffix isn't being created.
>
> The CQL is being sent to the server, ex
Looks like C* isn't creating the table with the lowest value integer
suffix. I created more tables and even if I reverse their order, the one
with the lowest integer suffix isn't being created.
The CQL is being sent to the server, executed (confirmed via the trace),
but when I read the tables bac
Can you provide the code that you use to create the table? This feels like
code error rather than a database bug.
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Kevin Burton wrote:
> 2.0.5… I'm upgrading to 2.0.9 now just to rule this out….
>
> I can give you the full CQL for the table, but I can't seem to
It still failed. Tracing shows that the query is being executed. Just
that the table isn't created. I did a diff against the two table names and
the only difference is the table name.
I even reversed their creation to see if that fixes it… but it still fails.
Very very weird.
On Wed, Aug 13,
ah.. good idea. I'll try that now.
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:36 PM, DuyHai Doan wrote:
> Maybe tracing the requests ? (just the one creating the schema of course)
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Kevin Burton wrote:
>
>> yeah… problem still exists on 2.0.9
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014
Maybe tracing the requests ? (just the one creating the schema of course)
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Kevin Burton wrote:
> yeah… problem still exists on 2.0.9
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Kevin Burton wrote:
>
>> and I'm certain that the CQL is executing… because I get a Resul
yeah… problem still exists on 2.0.9
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Kevin Burton wrote:
> and I'm certain that the CQL is executing… because I get a ResultSet back
> and verified that the CQL is correct.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Kevin Burton wrote:
>
>> 2.0.5… I'm upgrading to 2
and I'm certain that the CQL is executing… because I get a ResultSet back
and verified that the CQL is correct.
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Kevin Burton wrote:
> 2.0.5… I'm upgrading to 2.0.9 now just to rule this out….
>
> I can give you the full CQL for the table, but I can't seem to rep
2.0.5… I'm upgrading to 2.0.9 now just to rule this out….
I can give you the full CQL for the table, but I can't seem to reproduce it
without my entire app being included.
If I execute the CQL manually, it works… which is what makes this so weird.
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:11 PM, DuyHai Doan w
I'm tracking down a weird bug and was wondering if you guys had any
feedback.
I'm trying to create ten tables programatically.. .
The first one I create, for some reason, isn't created.
The other 9 are created without a problem.
Im doing this with the datastax driver's session.execute().
No ex
Can you just give the C* version and the complete DDL script to reproduce
the issue ?
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Kevin Burton wrote:
> I'm tracking down a weird bug and was wondering if you guys had any
> feedback.
>
> I'm trying to create ten tables programatically.. .
>
> The first one
12 matches
Mail list logo
