On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:42:13 -0400 Carlos Sanchez
wrote:
CS> We could have blob as large as 50mb compressed (XML compresses quite
CS> well). Typical documents we would deal with would be between 500K
CS> and 3MB
When just starting to use Cassandra I had serious issues with 0.5 and
blobs (comp
March 17, 2010 8:49 PM
> To: user@cassandra.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Storing large blobs
>
> My question would be how large is large? Perhaps you could compress the
> blobs and then store them. But it depends on the answer to the first
> question.
>
> Cheers
> Avinash
>
&g
@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Storing large blobs
My question would be how large is large? Perhaps you could compress the blobs
and then store them. But it depends on the answer to the first question.
Cheers
Avinash
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Carlos Sanchez
mailto:carlos.sanc
My question would be how large is large? Perhaps you could compress the
blobs and then store them. But it depends on the answer to the first
question.
Cheers
Avinash
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Carlos Sanchez <
carlos.sanc...@riskmetrics.com> wrote:
> Has anyone had experience storing large
It's not tailored for it, but it works "well enough" for some
applications. Better than having to deal with two different data
stores.
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Carlos Sanchez
wrote:
> Has anyone had experience storing large blobs in Cassandra? Is really
> Cassandra tailored for large co
