It is practically a seek and large streaming read. I do not believe this
would be an issue. I have never run such a workload but a simple experiment
should clear the air.

Cheers
Avinash

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Carlos Sanchez <
carlos.sanc...@riskmetrics.com> wrote:

> We could have blob as large as 50mb compressed (XML compresses quite well).
>  Typical documents we would deal with would be between 500K and 3MB
>
> Carlos
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Avinash Lakshman [avinash.laksh...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 8:49 PM
> To: user@cassandra.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Storing large blobs
>
> My question would be how large is large? Perhaps you could compress the
> blobs and then store them. But it depends on the answer to the first
> question.
>
> Cheers
> Avinash
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Carlos Sanchez <
> carlos.sanc...@riskmetrics.com<mailto:carlos.sanc...@riskmetrics.com>>
> wrote:
> Has anyone had experience storing large blobs in Cassandra? Is really
> Cassandra tailored for large content?
>
> Carlos
>
> This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended
> recipients and may contain proprietary and/or confidential information which
> may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Any unauthorized
> review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not an
> intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy the
> original message and any copies of the message as well as any attachments to
> the original message.
>
>
> This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended
> recipients and may contain proprietary and/or confidential information which
> may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Any unauthorized
> review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not an
> intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy the
> original message and any copies of the message as well as any attachments to
> the original message.
>

Reply via email to