On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Ryan Hadley wrote:
> Hi Brandon,
>
> Thanks for the reply. Quick question though:
>
> 1. We write all data to this ring with a TTL of 30 days
> 2. This node hasn't been in the ring for at least 90 days, more like 120 days
> since it's been in the ring.
>
> So, if
On Sep 14, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Brandon Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Ryan Hadley wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> So, here's the backstory:
>>
>> We were running Cassandra 0.7.4 and at one point in time had a node in the
>> ring at 10.84.73.18. We removed this node from the ring success
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Ryan Hadley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So, here's the backstory:
>
> We were running Cassandra 0.7.4 and at one point in time had a node in the
> ring at 10.84.73.18. We removed this node from the ring successfully in
> 0.7.4. It stopped showing in the nodetool ring comman
Hi,
So, here's the backstory:
We were running Cassandra 0.7.4 and at one point in time had a node in the ring
at 10.84.73.18. We removed this node from the ring successfully in 0.7.4. It
stopped showing in the nodetool ring command. But occasionally we'd still get
weird log entries about faili
